Neighbourhood collaboration in co-production: state-resourced responsiveness or state-retrenched responsibilisation?

References

• Alford, J., and S. Yates. 2016. “Co-Production of Public Services in Australia: The Roles of Government Organisations and Co-Producers.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 75 (2): 159–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, L. 2015. Beyond Williams: Public Service Leadership in Wales. Aberystwyth: Speech at the Institute of Welsh Affairs. http://www.iwa.wales/click/2015/01/beyond-williams-public-service-leadership-in-wales/.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, N., and M. C. Pill. 2015. “Can the State Empower Communities Through Localism? A Review of Recent Approaches to Neighbourhood Governance in England.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33 (2): 289–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, H. P., and E. Sørensen. 1999. “The Everyday Maker: A New Challenge to Democratic Governance.” Administrative Theory & Praxis 21 (3): 325–341.
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, C., M. Foden, P. Lawless, and I. Wilson. 2010. “Area-based Regeneration Partnerships and the Role of Central Government: the New Deal for Communities Programme in England.” Policy & Politics 38 (2): 235–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., and M. Honingh. 2016. “Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction: A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical Definitions.” Public Administration Review 76 (3): 427–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. 2007. “Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services.” Public Administration Review 67 (5): 846–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, D., and M. Harris. 2009. Discussion Paper. The Challenge of Co-Production: How Equal Partnerships Between Professionals and the Public are Crucial to Improving Public Services. London: NESTA.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. 2011. Giving, White Paper. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Cahn, E. 2000. No More Throw-Away People: The Co-Production Imperative. Washington, DC: Essential Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cardiff Council. 2010. What Matters Strategy. Cardiff: Cardiff City Council.
   Google Scholar
• Cardiff Council. 2013a. Choices for Cardiff: Cardiff Council Budget Consultation 2014/2015. Cardiff: Cardiff City Council.
   Google Scholar
• Cardiff Council. 2013b. Building Communities: A New Approach to Neighbourhood Working White Paper. Cardiff: Cardiff City Council.
   Google Scholar
• Cardiff Council. 2016. An Overview of the Budget Challenge 2017/18. Cardiff: Cardiff Council.
   Google Scholar
• Cardiff Partnership. 2016. Stepping Up: A Toolkit for Developing and Managing Services and Assets. https://www.cardiffpartnership.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/Stepping-Up-Toolkit-Amended-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chaskin, R. J., and D. M. Greenberg. 2015. “Between Public and Private Action: Neighborhood Organizations and Local Governance.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 44 (2): 248–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, J., and J. Newman. 2012. “The Alchemy of Austerity.” Critical Social Policy 32 (3): 299–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J. S. 2007. “The Limits of Partnership: an Exit-Action Strategy for Local Democratic Inclusion.” Political Studies 55: 779–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J. S., and I. Blanco. 2017. “Austerity Urbanism: Patterns of Neoliberalisation and Resistance in Six Cities of Spain and the UK.” Environment and Planning A 49 (7): 1517–1536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J. S., and M. C. Pill. 2012. “Empowerment or Abandonment? Prospects for Neighbourhood Revitalization Under the Big Society.” Public Money & Management 32 (3): 193–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durose, C. 2011. “Revisiting Lipsky: Front-Line Work in UK Local Governance.” Political Studies 59 (4): 978–995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Featherstone, A., D. Mackinnon, K. Strauss, and A. Cumbers. 2012. “Progressive Localism and the Construction of Political Alternatives.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 37: 177–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferlie, E., L. Fitzgerald, G. Mcgivern, S. Dopson, and C. Bennett. 2011. “Public Policy Networks and “Wicked Problems”: A Nascent Solution.” Public Administration 89 (2): 307–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, P., and S. Martin. 2000. “A new Deal for the Community? Public Participation in Regeneration and Local Service Delivery.” Policy & Politics 28 (4): 479–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getha-Taylor, H. 2008. “Identifying Collaborative Competencies.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 28 (2): 103–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, L. 2014. “Resilience or Resistance? Time Banking in the age of Austerity.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 22 (2): 171–183.
   Google Scholar
• Guarneros-Meza, V., and S. Martin. 2016. “. ‘Boundary Spanning in Local Public Service Partnerships: Coaches, Advocates or Enforcers?” ’ Public Management Review 18 (2): 238–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, F., and P. Tops. 2005. “Everyday Fixers as Local Heroes: A Case Study of Vital Interaction in Urban Governance.” Local Government Studies 31 (4): 475–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keast, R. 2011. “Joined-Up Governance in Australia: How the Past Can Inform the Future.” International Journal of Public Administration 34 (4): 221–231.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J., and E.-H. Klijn. 2004. Managing Uncertainties in Networks. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., and L. Pratchett. 2012. “Local Governance Under the Coalition Government: Austerity, Localism and the “Big Society”.” Local Government Studies 38 (1): 21–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J. 2014. “Landscapes of Antagonism: Local Governance, Neoliberalism and Austerity.” Urban Studies 51 (15): 3290–3305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J., and J. Clarke. 2009. Publics, Politics and Power: Remaking the Public in Public Services. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2011. Together for Better Public Services: Partnering with Citizens and Civil Society. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pill, M. C. 2011. Neighbourhood Management: Development of an Assessment Framework. Final Report to Welsh Government (New Ideas Social Research Fund). Cardiff: School of City and Regional Planning, Cardiff University.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. 2004. Transforming Local Governance: From Thatcherism to New Labour. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. 2011. “Was Local Governance Such a Good Idea? A Global Comparative Perspective.” Public Administration 89 (1): 15–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, H., P. Williams, M. Marchington, and L. Knight. 2013. “Collaborative Futures: Discursive Realignments in Austere Times.” Public Money & Management 33 (2): 123–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh Government. 2006. Interim Evaluation of Communities First: Final Report. Cardiff: Welsh Government.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh Government. 2007. Making the Connections - Local Service Boards in Wales: A Prospectus for the First Phase 2007-2008. Cardiff: Welsh Government.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, M. 2003. “In the Shadow of Hierarchy: Meta-Governance, Policy Reform and Urban Regeneration in the West Midlands.” Area 35 (1): 1475–4762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P. 2002. “The Competent Boundary Spanner.” Public Administration 80 (1): 103–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P. 2011. “The Life and Times of the Boundary Spanner.” Journal of Integrated Care 19 (3): 26–33.
   Google Scholar