Policy narrative, policy understanding and policy support intention: a survey experiment on energy conservation

References

• Baron, R. M., and D. A. Kenny. 1986. “The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 1173–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bischof, D., and R. Senninger. 2018. “Simple Politics for the People? Complexity in Campaign Messages and Political Knowledge.” European Journal of Political Research 57: 473–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, D., and M. Jones. 2018. “Narratives as Tools for Influencing Policy Change.” Policy & Politics 46 (2): 217–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, R. E. 1980. “The Rhetorical Functions of Slogans: Classifications and Characteristics.” Communication Quarterly 28 (2): 10–18.
   Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, A., and J. A. Siguaw. 2000. Introducing LISREL: A Guide for the Uninitiated. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fernbach, P. M., N. Light, S. E. Scott, Y. Inbar, and P. Rozin. 2019. “Extreme Opponents of Genetically Modified Foods Know the Least But Think They Know the Most.” Nature Human Behavior 3: 251–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. 1998. “Beyond Empiricism: Policy Inquiry in Post Positivist Perspective.” Policy Studies Journal 26 (1): 129–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. 2003. Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., and J. Forrester. 1993. The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilovich, T. 1991. How We Know What Isn’t So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graber, D. 1976. Verbal Behavior and Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S. 2012. “Linking Transparency, Knowledge, and Citizen Trust in Government: an Experiment.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 78 (1): 50–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S., G. Porumbescu, B. Hong, and Tobin Im. 2013. “The Effect of Transparency on Trust in Government: A Cross-National Comparative Experiment.” Public Administration Review 73 (4): 575–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther, S. K., and E. A. Shanahan. 2020. “Communicating Risk in Human-Wildlife Interactions: How Stories and Images Move Minds.” PloS One 15 (12): e0244440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. 2013. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Head, B. W., and J. Alford. 2015. “Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management.” Administration & Society 47 (6): 711–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. D. 2014. “Communicating Climate Change: Are Stories Better Than ‘Just the Facts’?” Policy Studies Journal 42 (4): 644–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. D., and M. K. McBeth. 2010. “A Narrative Policy Framework: Clear Enough to Be Wrong?” Policy Studies Journal 38 (2): 329–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. D., and G. Song. 2014. “Making Sense of Climate Change: How Story Frames Shape Cognition.” Political Psychology 35 (4): 447–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, T. J. 1986. “The Narrative Structure of Policy Analysis.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 5 (4): 761–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrink, K. J., and J. W. Stoutenborough. 2018. “Strategy, Narratives and Reading the Public: Developing a Micro-Level Theory of Political Strategies Within the Narrative Policy Framework.” Policy Studies Journal 46 (4): 949–977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, K., B. Cashore, and S. Bernstein. 2012. “Overcoming the Tragedy of Super Wicked Problems: Containing our Future Selves to Ameliorate Global Climate Change.” Policy Sciences 45 (2): 123–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liaoning Provincial Bureau of Statistics. 2019. Liaoning Statistical Yearbook 2019. Shenyang: Liaoning Provincial Bureau of Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Linde, S. 2018. “Political Communication and Public Support for Climate Mitigation Policies: A Country-Comparative Perspective.” Climate Policy 18 (5): 543–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, V., R. Wei, H. Lu, and H. Hou. 2015. “Perceived Issue Importance, Information Processing, and Third-Person Effect of News About the Imported US Beef Controversy.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 27 (3): 342–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupia, A. 2015. Uninformed: Why People Seem to Know So Little About Politics and What We Can Do About It. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lybecker, D. L., M. K. McBeth, and E. Kusko. 2013. “Trash or Treasure: Recycling Narratives and Reducing Political Polarisation.” Environmental Politics 22 (2): 312–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lybecker, D. L., M. K. McBeth, and J. W. Stoutenborough. 2016. “Do we Understand What the Public Hears? Stakeholders’ Preferred Communication Choices for Discussing River Issues with the Public.” Review of Policy Research 33 (4): 376–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G., and A. Wildavsky. 1979. “Implementation as Evolution.” In Implementation. 3rd ed., edited by J. L. Pressman, and A. Wildavsky, 163–180. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• McBeth, M. K., D. L. Lybecker, and J. W. Stoutenborough. 2016. “Do Stakeholders Analyze Their Audience? The Communication Switch and Stakeholder Personal Versus Public Communication Choices.” Policy Sciences 49: 421–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBeth, M. K., D. L. Lybecker, J. W. Stoutenborough, S. N. Davis, and K. Running. 2017. “Content Matters: Stakeholder Assessment of River Stories or River Science.” Public Policy and Administration 32 (3): 175–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBeth, M. K., E. A. Shanahan, R. J. Arnell, and P. J. Hathaway. 2007. “The Intersection of Narrative Policy Analysis and Policy Change Theory.” Policy Studies Journal 35 (1): 87–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merry, M. K. 2018. “Narrative Strategies in the gun Policy Debate: Exploring Proximity and Social Construction.” Policy Studies Journal 46 (4): 747–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mettler, S. 2011. The Submerged State: How Invisible Government Policies Undermine American Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2010. “polycentric Systems for Coping with Collective Action and Global Environmental Change.” Global Environmental Change 20: 550–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F., A. Penkl, and J. Sweller. 2003. “Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments.” Educational Psychologist 38: 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. 2017. “What is so Wicked About Wicked Problems? A Conceptual Analysis and a Research Program.” Policy and Society 36 (3): 385–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porumbescu, G. A., N. Belle, M. Cucciniello, and G. Nasi. 2017a. “Translating Policy Transparency Into Policy Understanding and Policy Support: Evidence from a Survey Experiment.” Public Administration 95: 990–1008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porumbescu, G. A., M. I. H. Lindeman, E. Ceka, and M. Cucciniello. 2017b. “Can Transparency Foster More Understanding and Compliant Citizens?” Public Administration Review 77: 840–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennekamp, K. 2012. “Processing Fluency and Investors’ Reactions to Disclosure Readability.” Journal of Accounting Research 50 (5): 1319–1354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, E. 1994. Narrative Policy Analysis: Theory and Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A., and H. Ingram. 1993. “Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy.” American Political Science Review 87 (2): 334–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, E. A., M. D. Jones, and M. K. McBeth. 2011a. “Policy Narratives and Policy Processes.” Policy Studies Journal 39 (3): 535–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, E. A., M. D. Jones, and M. K. McBeth. 2018a. “How to Conduct a Narrative Policy Framework Study.” The Social Science Journal 55: 332–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, E. A., M. D. Jones, M. K. McBeth, and R. R. Lane. 2013. “An Angel on the Wind: How Heroic Policy Narratives Shape Policy Realities.” Policy Studies Journal 41 (3): 453–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, E. A., M. D. Jones, M. K. McBeth, and C. Radaelli. 2018b. “The Narrative Policy Framework.” Chapter 5. In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by C. M. Weible, and P. A. Sabatier, 173–214. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, E. A., M. K. McBeth, and P. L. Hathaway. 2011b. “Narrative Policy Framework: The Influence of Media Policy Narratives on Public Opinion.” Politics and Policy 39 (3): 373–400.
   Google Scholar
• Sides, J. 2016. “Stories or Science? Facts, Frames, and Policy Attitudes.” American Politics Research 44 (3): 387–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. 2002. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. revised 3rd ed. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. 1993. “Some Cognitive Processes and Their Consequences for the Organization and Presentation of Information.” Australian Journal of Psychology 45 (1): 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. 1994. “Cognitive Load Theory, Learning Difficulty and Instructional Design.” Learning and Instruction 4: 295–312.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gerven, M. 2019. “Narrative Stories in Chinese Characters: Political Framing of Ageing and Welfare Reform in China.” Policy and Society 38 (3): 502–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, J., and M. R. Chertow. 2017. “Business Strategy Under Institutional Constraints: Evidence from China’s Energy Efficient Regulations.” Ecological Economics 135: 10–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar