Publication Cover
Educational Psychology
An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology
Volume 35, 2015 - Issue 2
1,451
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The effect of peer group performance on the self-concept of reading in a foreign language

, , , &
Pages 158-175 | Received 06 Nov 2012, Accepted 26 Aug 2013, Published online: 11 Nov 2013

References

  • Altermatt, E. R., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2005). The implications of having high-achieving versus low-achieving friends: A longitudinal analysis. Social Development, 14, 61–81.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
  • Bissell-Havran, J. M., & Loken, E. (2009). The role of friends in early adolescents’ academic self-competence and intrinsic value for math and English. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 38, 41–50.
  • Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15, 1–40.
  • Buckingham, J. T., & Alicke, M. D. (2002). The influence of individual versus aggregate social comparison and the presence of others on self-evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1117–1130.
  • Burleson, K., Leach, C. W., & Harrington, D. M. (2005). Upward social comparison and self-concept: Inspiration and inferiority among art students in an advanced programme. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 109–123.
  • Burstein, L. (1980). The analysis of multilevel data in educational research and evaluation. Review of Research in Education, 8, 158–233.
  • Butler, R. (1992). What young people want to know when: Effects of mastery and ability goals on interest in different kinds of social comparisons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 934–943.
  • Chanal, J. P., Marsh, H. W., Sarrazin, P. G., & Bois, J. E. (2005). Big-fish-little-pond effects on gymnastics self-concept: Social comparison processes in a psychical setting. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 27, 53–70.
  • Clément, R. (1980). Ethnicity, contact and communicative competence in a second language. In H. Giles, W. P. Robinson, & P. M. Smith (Eds.), Language: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 147–154). Oxford: Pergamon.
  • Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Davis, J. A. (1966). The campus as a frog pond: An application of theory of relative deprivation to career decisions for college men. American Journal of Sociology, 72, 17–31.
  • Dickhäuser, O., Reuter, M., & Hilling, C. (2005). Coursework selection: A frame of reference approach using structural equation modelling. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 673–688.
  • Dickhäuser, O., & Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (2003). Perceived teachers’ ability evaluations and boys’ and girls’ concepts of their mathematical ability in elementary school. Psychologie in Erzeihung und Unterricht, 50, 182–190.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2006). Individual differences in second language acquisition. AILA Review, 19, 42–68.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2009). Individual differences: Interplay of learner characteristics and learning environment. Language Learning, 59, 230–248.
  • Ehrman, M. E., Leaver, B. L., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning. System, 31, 313–330.
  • Enders, C. G., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A now look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138.
  • Ferla, J., Valcke, M., & Cai, Y. (2009). Academic self-efficacy and academic self-concept: Reconsidering structural relationships. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 499–505.
  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
  • Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S., & Hochschild, L. (2002). When you and I are “we”, you are not threatening: The role of self-expansion in social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 239–251.
  • Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models. London: Arnold.
  • Hendriks, A. A. J., Kuyper, H., Lubbers, M. J., & Van der Werf, M. P. C. (2011). Personality as a moderator of context effects on academic achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 217–248.
  • Hofmann, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24, 623–641.
  • Huang, Ch. (2011). Self-concept and academic achievement: A meta-analysis of longitudinal relations. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 505–528.
  • Hughes, A., Galbraith, D., & White, D. (2011). Perceived competence: A common core for self-efficacy and self-concept? Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 278–289.
  • Huguet, P., Dumas, F., Marsh, H. W., Régner, I., Wheeler, L., Suls, J., … Nezlek, J. (2009). Clarifying the role of social comparison in the big-fish-little-pond effect: An integrative study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 156–170.
  • Jonkmann, K., Becker, M., Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., & Trautwein, U. (2012). Personality traits moderate the Bif-Fish-Little-Pond Effect of academic self-concept. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 736–746.
  • Kreft, I. G. G., de Leeuw, J., & Aiken, L. S. (1995). The effect of different forms of centering in hierarchical linear models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 1–21.
  • Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., Marsh, H. W., & Trautwein, U. (2005). Teacher frame of reference and the big-fish-little-pond effect. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 263–285.
  • MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 545–562.
  • Margas, N., Fontayne, P., & Brunel, P. C. (2006). Influences of classmates’ ability level on physical self-evaluations. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7, 235–247.
  • Marsh, H. W. (1984). Relations among dimensions of self-attribution, dimensions of self-concept, and academic achievements. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1291–1308.
  • Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 280–295.
  • Marsh, H. W. (1989). Age and sex effects in multiple dimensions of self-concept: Preadolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 417–430.
  • Marsh, H. W. (1990a). A multidimensional, hierarchical self-concept: Theoretical and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 77–171.
  • Marsh, H. W. (1990b). The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 623–636.
  • Marsh, H. W. (1993). Academic self-concept: Theory, measurement, and research. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 45, pp. 59–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Marsh, H. W. (1994). Using the national longitudinal study of 1988 to evaluate theoretical models of self-concept – The self-description questionnaire. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 439–456.
  • Marsh, H. W., Chessor, D., Craven, R., & Roche, L. (1995). The effects of gifted and talented programs on academic self-concept: The big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 285–319.
  • Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American psychologists, 58, 364–376.
  • Marsh, H. W., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2001). Reunification of East and West German school systems: Longitudinal multilevel modelling study of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 321–350.
  • Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., & Nagengast, B. (2009). Doubly-latent models of school contextual effects: Integrating multilevel and structural equation approaches to control measurement and sampling error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 764–802.
  • Marsh, H. W., & Parker, J. W. (1984). Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don’t learn to swim as well? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 213–231.
  • Marsh, H. W., & Rowe, K. J. (1996). The negative effects of school-average ability on academic self-concept: An application of multilevel modelling. Australian Journal of Education, 40, 65–87.
  • Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Baumert, J., & Köller, O. (2007). The big-fish-little-pond effect: Persistent negative effects of selective high schools on self-concept after graduation. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 631–669.
  • Marsh, H. W., & Yeung, A. S. (1997). Coursework selection: Relations to academic selfconcept and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 691–720.
  • Mills, N., Pajares, F., & Herron, C. (2007). Self-efficacy of college intermediate French students: Relation to achievement and motivation. Language Learning, 57, 417–442.
  • Peugh, J. L. (2010). A practical guide to multilevel modeling. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 85–112.
  • Plucker, J. A., Robinson, N. M., Greenspon, T. S., Feldhusen, J. F., McCoach, D. B., & Subotnik, R. F. (2004). It’s not how the pond makes you feel, but rather how high you can jump. American Psychologist, 59, 268–269.
  • Pomerantz, E. M., Ruble, D. N., Frey, K. S., & Greulich, F. (1995). Meeting goals and confronting conflict: Children’s changing perceptions of social comparison. Child Development, 66, 723–738.
  • Preckel, F., & Brüll, M. (2010). The benefit of being a big fish in a big pond: Contrast and assimilation effects on academic self-concept. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 522–531.
  • Rasbash, J., Charlton, C., Browne, W. J., Healy, M., & Cameron, B. (2005). MLwiN (Version 2.02). Centre for Multilevel Modelling. Bristol: University of Bristol.
  • Saville-Troike, M. (2006). Introducing second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Seaton, M., Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2009). Earning its place as a pan-human theory: Universality of the big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE) across 41 culturally and economically diverse countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 403–441.
  • Seaton, M., Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2010). Big-fish-little-pond effect: Generalizability and moderation – Two sides of the same coin. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 390–433.
  • Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretation. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.
  • Stevick, E. W. (1980). Teaching languages: A way and ways. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
  • Thijs, J., Verkuyten, M., & Helmond, P. (2010). A further examination of the big-fish-little-pond effect: Perceived position in class, class size, and gender comparisons. Sociology of Education, 83, 333–345.
  • Thissen, D., & Wainer, H. (Eds.). (2001). Test scoring. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2006). Tracking, grading, and student motivation: Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 788–806.
  • Tremblay, P. F., & Gardner, R. C. (1995). Expanding the motivation construct in language learning. Modern Language Journal, 79, 505–518.
  • Tymms, P. (2001). A test of the big fish in a little pond hypothesis: An investigation into the feelings of seven-year-old pupils in school. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12, 161–181.
  • White, C. (2008). Beliefs and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 121–130). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wouters, S., Colpin, H., Germeijs, V., & Verschueren, K. (2009). Understanding the effects of being a big fish in a little pond on academic self-concept. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65, 89–101.
  • Wouters, S., Germeijs, V., Colpin, H., & Verschueren, K. (2011). Academic self-concept in high school: Predictors and effects on adjustment in higher education. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 586–594.
  • Zell, E., & Alicke, M. D. (2009). Contextual neglect, self-evaluation, and the frog-pond effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 467–482.
  • Zell, E., & Alicke, M. D. (2010). The local dominance effect in self-evaluation: Evidence and explanations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 368–384.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.