Future time orientation and learning conceptions: effects on metacognitive strategies, self-efficacy beliefs, study effort and academic achievement

References

• Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. C. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boulton-Lewis, G. M., Marton, F., & Wilss, L. (2001). The lived space of learning: An inquiry into indigenous Australian university students’ experiences of studying. In R. J. Sternberg & L.-F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 137–164). Londres: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Boulton-Lewis, G., Wilss, L., & Lewis, D. (2003). Dissonance between conceptions of learning and ways of learning for indigenous Australian University Students. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 79–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1989). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavior Research, 24, 445–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cano, F. (2005). Consonance and dissonance in students’ learning experience. Learning and Instruction, 15, 201–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, W. T., Lee, J., Husman, J., Stump, G., Maez, C., & Done, A. (2009). Connecting to the future: How the perception of future impacts engineering undergraduate students’ learning and performance. FIE’09 Proceedings of the 39th IEEE International conference on Frontiers in education conference.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• De Bilde, J., Vansteenkiste, M., & Lens, W. (2011). Understanding the association between future time perspective and self-regulated learning through the lens of self-determination theory. Learning and Instruction, 21, 332–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epel, E. S., Bandura, A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1999). Escaping homelessness: The influences of self-efficacy and time perspective on coping with homelessness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 575–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferla, J., Valcke, M., & Schuyten, G. (2008). Relationships between student cognitions and their effects on study strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 271–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horstmanshof, L., & Zimitat, C. (2007). Future time orientation predicts academic engagement among first-year university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 703–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. (1982). Causal analysis: Models, assumptions and data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, D. F., & Husman, J. (2004). Effects of time perspective on student motivation: Introduction to a special issue. Educational Psychology Review, 16(1), 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lens, W., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2008). Promoting self-regulated learning a motivational analysis. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman(Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications(pp. 141–169). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Fernandez, J. R. (2004). Conceptions of learning, metacognitive strategies, and conceptual change in psychology undergraduates (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universitat de Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Fernandez, J. R., Tubaut, E., Guilera, L., Rabanaque, S., & Sanchez, E. (2008). Utilidad de distintas ayudas en la resolución de un problema de insight y su relación con las estrategias metacognitivas [Usefulness of different hints in solving an insight problem: Relationship with metacognitive strategies]. Anales de Psicologia, 24, 16–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography – describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McInerney, D. M. (2004). A discussion of future time perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 141–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mello, Z. R., & Worrell, F. C. (2006). The relationship of time perspective to age, gender, and academic achievement among academically talented adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 271–289.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F. (1999). Assessing outcomes in terms of the ‘hidden’ observables. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning-improving student learning outcomes (pp. 25–37). Oxford: OCSD/Oxford Brookes University.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F. (2000). The modelling of ‘dissonant’ study orchestration in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 5–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R. B., & Brickman, S. J. (2004). A model of future-oriented motivation and self-regulation. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 9–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil, H. F., & Abedi, J. (1996). Reliability and validity of a state metacognitive inventory: Potential for alternative assessment. The Journal of Educational Research, 89, 234–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (2008). Motivational role of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 111–141). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Peetsma, T. T. D., Hascher, T., van der Veen, I., & Roede, E. (2005). Relations between adolescents’ self-evaluations, time perspectives, motivation for school and their achievement in different countries and at different ages. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20, 209–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peetsma, T., & Van der Veen, I. (2011). Relations between the development of future time perspective in three life domains, investment in learning, and academic achievement. Learning and Instruction, 21, 481–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phan, H. P. (2009). Amalgamation of future time orientation, epistemological beliefs, achievement goals and study strategies: Empirical evidence established. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 155–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phan, H. P. (2010). Empirical model and analysis of mastery and performance-approach goals: A developmental approach. Educational Psychology, 30, 547–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdie, N., Hattie, J., & Douglas, G. (1996). Student conceptions of learning and their use of self-regulated learning strategies: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 87–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Säljö, R. (1979). Learning about learning. Higher Education, 8, 443–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shell, D. F., & Husman, J. (2001). The multivariate dimensionality of personal control and future time perspective in achievement and studying. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 481–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock, J., & Cervone, D. (1990). Proximal goal setting and self-regulatory processes. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 483–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, S. E., Miller, R. B., & Relyea, G. E. (2008). The relationships among students’ future-oriented goals and subgoals, perceived task instrumentality, and task-oriented self-regulation strategies in an academic environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 629–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C.-C., Ho, H. N., Liang, J.-C., & Lin, H.-M. (2011). Scientific epistemic beliefs, conceptions of learning science and self-efficacy of learning science among high school students. Learning and Instruction, 21, 757–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). The reliability coefficient for maxi-mum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 149–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. D.(2011). Pattern on student learning and teacher learning. In S. Rayner & E. Cools (Eds.), Style differences in cognition, learning, and management. Theory, research, and practice (pp. 172–187). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. D., & Minnaert, A. (2003). Dissonance in student learning patterns: When to revise theory. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 49–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. D., & Verloop, N. (2000). Dissonance in students’ regulation of learning processes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 75–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu-Fang, Y., & Chin-Chung, T. (2010). Conceptions of and approaches to learning through online peer assessment. Learning and Instruction, 20, 72–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zebardast, A., Besharat, M. A., & Hghighatgoo, M. (2011). The relationship between self-regulation and time perspective in students. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 838–943.
   Google Scholar
• Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-difference metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martínez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 663–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2008). Motivation: An essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk, & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated Learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 1–30). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar