The influence of student learning characteristics on purchase of paper book and eBook for university study and personal interest

References

• Ackerman, R., & Goldsmith, M. (2011). Metacognitive regulation of text learning: On screen versus on paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 18–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artino, A., & Stephens, J. (2009). Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online. The Internet and Higher Education, 12, 146–151.10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avidov-Ungar, O., & Eshet-Alkakay, Y. (2011). Teachers in a world of change: Teachers’ knowledge and attitudes towards the implementation of innovative technologies in schools. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 7, 291–303.
   Google Scholar
• Behler, A., & Lush, B. (2010). Are you ready for e-readers? The Reference Librarian, 52, 75–87.10.1080/02763877.2011.523261
   Google Scholar
• Berg, S. A., Hoffmann, K., & Dawson, D. (2010). Not on the same page: Undergraduates’ information retrieval in electronic and print books. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36, 518–525.10.1016/j.acalib.2010.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417–444.10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brahme, M., & Gabriel, L. (2012). Are students keeping up with the E-book evolution? Are E-books keeping up with students’ evolving needs?: Distance students and E-book usage, a survey. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 6, 180–198.10.1080/1533290X.2012.705109
   Google Scholar
• Brunet, D. P., Bates, M. L., Gallo, J. R., & Strother, E. A. (2011). Incoming dental students’ expectations and acceptance of an electronic textbook program. Journal of Dental Education, 75, 646–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy, E. D., Martinez, M., & Shen, L. (2012). Not in love, or not in the know? Graduate student and faculty use (and non-use) of e-books. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38, 326–332.10.1016/j.acalib.2012.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., & Whitesel, J. (2012). The validity and reliability study of a revised Motivated Strategy for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) for assessing computer software learning strategies. International Journal of E-Adoption, 4, 28–51.10.4018/IJEA
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, K.-H., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). University students’ online academic help seeking: The role of self-regulation and information commitments. The Internet and Higher Education, 16, 70–77.10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, M.-H., & Summers, J. (2012). Factor validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) in asynchronous online learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 23, 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, M. (2013). Strategy use for reading English for general and specific academic purposes in testing and nontesting contexts. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 175–197.10.1002/rrq.2013.48.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, K. M. T., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Jiao, Q. G. (2011). The relationship between reading ability and self-perception among African-American postgraduate students. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 11, 43–53.
   Google Scholar
• Credé, M., & Phillips, L. A. (2011). A meta-analytic review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 337–346.10.1016/j.lindif.2011.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croft, R., & Davis, C. (2010). E-books revisited: Surveying student e-book usage in a distributed learning academic library 6 years later. Journal of Library Administration, 50, 543–569.10.1080/01930826.2010.488600
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, D. B., & Woody, W. D. (2013). E-textbooks at what cost? Performance and use of electronic v. print texts. Computers & Education, 62, 18–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denrell, J. (2007). Adaptive learning and risk taking. Psychological Review, 114, 177–187.10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, J., & Johnson, G. M. (2011). Internet use and psychological wellness during late adulthood. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, 30, 197–209.10.1017/S0714980811000109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. A., Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2011). Self-regulation of learning with computer-based learning environments. In H. Bembenutty (Ed.), Self-regulated learning (pp. 107–116). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffelder, N. (2013). Infographics: Who reads eBooks? The Digital Reader. Retrieved from http://www.the-digital-reader.com/2013/01/24/infographic-who-reads-ebooks/#.UfSON1c9V8E
   Google Scholar
• Jabr, F. (2013). The reading brain in the digital age: The science of paper versus screens. Scientific American. Retrieved from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=reading-paper-screens
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. (2007). Restricted versus unrestricted learning: Synthesis of recent meta-analyses. AACE Journal, 15, 267–278.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. M. (2006). Online study groups: Reciprocal peer questioning vs. mnemonic devices. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 83–96.10.2190/1G67-HLL5-4172-083U
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. M. (2007). College student internet use: Convenience and amusement. Canadian Journal of Learning & Technology, 33, 141–157.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. M. (2008a). Cognitive processing differences between frequent and infrequent internet users. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2094–2106.10.1016/j.chb.2007.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. M. (2008b). The effectiveness of distance education vs. classroom instruction: A summary of Bernard’s meta-analysis with implications for practice. International Journal of Instructional Media, 35, 137–144.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. M. (2011). Internet activities and developmental predictors: Gender differences among digital natives. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 10, 64–76.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. M. (2013a). Technology use and reading comprehension among Australian Indigenous adolescents. International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sciences, 2, 558–564.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. M. (2013). Traditional literacy skills and internet use among 8- to 12-year-old children. Reading Psychology, 34, 486–506.10.1080/02702711.2012.658144
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G., & Broadley, T. (2011). Learning style and digital activity: An ecological study. In G. Williams, P. Statham, N. Brown, & B. Cleland (Eds.), Proceedings Ascilite, changing demands, changing directions (pp. 643–656). University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/hobart11/procs/Johnson-full.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. M., & Howell, A. J. (2005). Attitude toward instructional technology following required vs. optional WebCT usage. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education, 13, 643–654.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P. (2011). Digital to overtake print by 2014. Bookseller. Retrieved from http://www.thebookseller.com/news/digital-may-overtake-print-sales-2014.html
   Google Scholar
• Joo, S., Durband, D., & Grable, J. (2008). The academic impact of financial stress on college students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 10, 287–305.10.2190/CS.10.3.c
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. (2010). A year of demand driven acquisition of e-books at the open polytechnic library. The New Zealand Library & Information Management Journal, 52, 41–54.
   Google Scholar
• Kretzschmar, F., Pleimling, D., Hosemann, J., Füssel, S., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2013). Subjective impressions do not mirror online reading effort: Concurrent EEG-eyetracking evidence from the reading of books and digital media. PLoS ONE 8, e56178. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuter, F., Presser, S., & Tourangeau, R. (2008). Social desirability bias in CATI, IVR, and web surveys: The effects of mode and question sensitivity. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 847–865.10.1093/poq/nfn063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamothe, A. (2010). Electronic book usage patterns as observed at an academic library: Searches and viewings. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 5(1), 1–22. Retrieved from https://journal.lib.uoguelph.ca/index.php/perj/article/view/1071#.VK9E4RYul8E
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. C., Fretwell, C. E., Ryan, J., & Parham, J. B. (2013). Faculty use of established and emerging technologies in higher education: A unified theory of acceptance and use of technology perspective. International Journal of Higher Education, 2, 22–34.
   Google Scholar
• MacFadyen, H. (2011). The reader’s devices: The affordances of eBook readers. Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management, 7, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Magliano, J. P., Millis, K. K., Levinstein, I., & Boonthum, C. (2011). Assessing comprehension during reading with the Reading Strategy Assessment Tool (RSAT). Metacognition and Learning, 6, 131–154.10.1007/s11409-010-9064-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Estrada, P. D., & Conaway, R. N. (2012). EBooks: The next step in educational innovation. Business Communication Quarterly, 75, 125–135.10.1177/1080569911432628
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J., Nutting, A., & Baker-Eveleth, L. (2013). The determinants of electronic textbook use among college students. American Economist, 58, 41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, N. (2012). The best of both worlds: Indiana university pioneers e-textbook model. EDTECH. Retrieved from http://www.edtechmagazine.com/higher/article/2012/10/best-both-worlds-indiana-university-pioneers-e-textbook-model
   Google Scholar
• Park, M. (2013). Who is the eBook consumer? Random House Random Notes. Retrieved from http://randomnotes.randomhouse.com/who-reads-ebooks/
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, A. G., & Naug, H. (2013). Identification of at-risk students and strategies to improve academic success in first year health programs. A practice report. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 4, 135–144.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407.10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813.10.1177/0013164493053003024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulfrey, C., Darnon, C., & Butera, F. (2013). Autonomy and task performance: Explaining the impact of grades on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 39–57.10.1037/a0029376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raisman, N. A. (2013). The cost of college attrition at four-year colleges and universities: An analysis of 1669 US institutions. Educational Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.educationalpolicy.org/pdf/1302_PolicyPerspectives.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rivero, V. (2013). Tools for learning: Digital textbooks – Show me the future! Internet@schools. Retrieved from http://www.internetatschools.com/Articles/Editorial/Features/TOOLS-FOR-LEARNING-Digital-Textbooks–Show-Me-the-Future!-89289.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Siminoff, D. (2013). The etext revolution: Rewriting the textbook model. Internet@schools. Retrieved from http://www.internetatschools.com/Articles/Editorial/Features/The-Etext-Revolution-Rewriting-the-Textbook-Model-89288.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, S., & Carlin, A. P. (2012). Use and perception of eBooks in the University of Ulster: A case study. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 18, 176–205.10.1080/13614533.2012.719851
   Google Scholar
• Talbott, N. R., Bhattacharya, A., Davis, K. G., Shukla, R., & Levin, L. (2009). School backpacks: It’s more than just a weight problem. Work, 34, 481–494.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turan, S., Valcke, M., De Maeseneer, J., Aper, L., Koole, S., De Wispelaere, C., … Derese, A. (2013). A novel Medical Achievement Self-efficacy Scale (MASS): A valid and reliable tool. Medical Teacher, 35, 575–580.10.3109/0142159X.2013.798401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. S., Ari, O., & Santamaria, C. N. (2011). Measuring college students’ reading comprehension ability using cloze tests. Journal of Research in Reading, 34, 215–231.10.1111/jrir.2011.34.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woody, W. D., Daniel, D. B., & Baker, C. A. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers & Education, 55, 945–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zenotz, V. (2012). Awareness development for online reading. Language Awareness, 21, 85–100.10.1080/09658416.2011.639893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar