A review scrutinising the consequential validity of dynamic assessment

References

• Antón, M. (2009). Dynamic assessment of advanced second language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 42, 576–598.10.1111/flan.2009.42.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckmann, J. F. (2006). Superiority: Always and everywhere? On some misconceptions in the validation of dynamic testing. Educational and Child Psychology, 23, 35–49.
   Google Scholar
• Borkowski, J. G., Carothers, S. S., Howard, K., Schatz, J., & Farris, J. R. (2007). Intellectual assessment and intellectual disability. In J. W. Jacobson, J. A. Mulick, J. Rojahn, J. W. Jacobson, J. A. Mulick, & J. Rojahn (Eds.), Handbook of intellectual and developmental disabilities (pp. 261–277). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/0-387-32931-5_14
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1992). Principles of dynamic assessment: The application of a specific model. Learning and Individual Differences, 4, 153–166. doi:10.1016/1041-6080(92)90011-310.1016/1041-6080(92)90011-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Bouton, B., Gilbert, J. K., Barquero, L. A., … Crouch, R. C. (2010). Selecting at-risk first-grade readers for early intervention: Eliminating false positives and exploring the promise of a two-stage gated screening process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 327–340. doi:10.1037/a001844810.1037/a0018448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Beer, M. (2010a). Longitudinal predictive validity of a learning potential test. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 20, 225–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Beer, M. (2010b). A modern assessment psychometric approach to dynamic assessment. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 20, 241–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dina, F., & Efklides, A. (2009). Metacognitive experiences as the link between situational characteristics, motivation, and affect in self-regulated learning. In M. Wosnitza, S. Karabenick, A. Efklides, & P. Nenniger (Eds.), Contemporary motivation research: From global to local perspectives (pp. 117–146). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Dolores Calero, M., Belen, G. M., & Auxiliadora Robles, M. (2011). Learning potential in high IQ children: The contribution of dynamic assessment to the identification of gifted children RID C-7284-2011. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 176–181. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.02510.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elleman, A. M., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Bouton, B. (2011). Exploring dynamic assessment as a means of identifying children at risk of developing comprehension difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 348–357. doi:10.1177/002221941140786510.1177/0022219411407865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabio, R. A. (2005). Dynamic assessment of intelligence is a better reply to adaptive behavior and cognitive plasticity. The Journal of General Psychology, 132, 41–64.10.3200/GENP.132.1.41-66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. B. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers. The learning potential assessment device: Theory, instruments, and techniques. Jerusalem: ICELP Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, L. S., Bouton, B., & Caffrey, E. (2011). The construct and predictive validity of a dynamic assessment of young children learning to read: Implications for RTI frameworks. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 339–347. doi:10.1177/002221941140786410.1177/0022219411407864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Hollenbeck, K. N., Craddock, C. F., & Hamlett, C. L. (2008). Dynamic assessment of algebraic learning in predicting third graders’ development of mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 829–850.10.1037/a0012657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Hollenbeck, K. N., Hamlett, C. L., & Seethaler, P. M. (2011). Two-stage screening for math problem-solving difficulty using dynamic assessment of algebraic learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 372–380. doi:10.1177/002221941140786710.1177/0022219411407867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gielen, S., Dochy, F., & Dierick, S. (2003). Evaluating the consequential validity of new modes of assessment: The influence of assessment on learning, including pre-, post-, and true assessment effects. In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E. Cascallar (Eds.), Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (pp. 37–54). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/0-306-48125-1
   Google Scholar
• Gillam, S. L., Fargo, J., Foley, B., & Olszewski, A. (2011). A nonverbal phoneme deletion task administered in a dynamic assessment format. Journal of Communication Disorders, 44, 236–245. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.11.00310.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gummersall, D. M., & Strong, C. J. (1999). Assessment of complex sentence production in a narrative context. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 152–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamers, J. H. M., Hessels, M. G. P., & Pennings, A. H. (1996). Learning potential in ethnic minority children. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12, 183–192.10.1027/1015-5759.12.3.183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haywood, H. C. (2012). Dynamic assessment: A history of fundamental ideas. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 11, 217–229. doi:10.1891/1945-8959.11.3.217
   Google Scholar
• Hessels, M. G. P. (1993). Leertest voor ethische minderheden: Theoretische en empirische verantwoording [Learning potential test for ethnic minorities: Theoretical and empirical foundation]. Rotterdam: RISBO.
   Google Scholar
• Hessels, M. G. P. (2000). The learning potential test for ethnic minorities (LEM): A tool for standardized assessment of children in kindergarten and the first years of primary school. In C. S. Lidz & J. Elliott (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 109–131). New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hessels-Schlatter, C., & Hessels, M. G. P. (2009). Clarifying some issues in dynamic assessment: Comments on Karpov and Tzuriel. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 8, 246–251.10.1891/1945-8959.8.3.246
   Google Scholar
• Jeltova, I., Birney, D., Fredine, N., Jarvin, L., Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2011). Making instruction and assessment responsive to diverse students’ progress: Group-administered dynamic assessment in teaching mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 381–395. doi:10.1177/002221941140786810.1177/0022219411407868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jitendra, A. K., & Kameenui, E. J. (1996). Experts’ and novices error patterns in solving part-whole mathematical word problems. Journal of Educational Research, 90, 42–51.10.1080/00220671.1996.9944442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanevsky, L., & Geake, J. (2004). Inside the zone of proximal development: Validating a multifactor model of learning potential with gifted students and their peers. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 182–217.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, N., Golstand, S., Bar-Ilan, R. T., & Parush, S. (2007). The dynamic occupational therapy cognitive assessment for children (DOTCA-ch): A new instrument for assessing learning potential. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 41–52.10.5014/ajot.61.1.41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, M. W., Weiler, M. D., Bernstein, J. H., Forbes, P. W., & Waber, D. P. (2001). Sources of poor performance on the rey-osterrieth complex figure test among children with learning difficulties: A dynamic assessment approach. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 15, 345–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, J. A., & Nippold, M. A. (2007). Morphological analysis in school-age children: Dynamic assessment of a word learning strategy. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 38, 201–212.10.1044/0161-1461(2007/021)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauchlan, F., & Elliott, J. (2001). The psychological assessment of learning potential. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 647–665.10.1348/000709901158712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidz, C. S. (1995). Dynamic assessment and the legacy of L.S. Vygotsky. School Psychology International, 16, 143–153.10.1177/0143034395162005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidz, C. S., & Macrine, S. L. (2001). An alternative approach to the identification of gifted culturally and linguistically diverse learners: The contribution of dynamic assessment. School Psychology International, 22, 74–96.10.1177/01430343010221006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, J. (2001). Learning potential and anxious tendency: Test anxiety as a bias factor in educational testing. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 14, 337–362.10.1080/10615800108248361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, J., & Elshout, J. J. (2001). The predictive and discriminant validity of the zone of proximal development. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 93–113.10.1348/000709901158415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational Researcher, 18, 5–11.10.3102/0013189X018002005
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1995). Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 14, 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Minnaert, A., & Vermunt, J. D. (2006). 25 jaar Onderwijspsychologie in Nederland en Vlaanderen in de periode 1980 tot 2005: Trends, pendels en grensverleggers [25 years of Educational psychology in The Netherlands and Flanders during 1980 till 2005]. Pedagogische Studiën, 83, 260–277.
   Google Scholar
• Nirmalakhandan, N. (2009). Use of computerized dynamic assessment to improve student achievement: Case study. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 135, 75–80.10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2009)135:2(75)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peltenburg, M., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Doig, B. (2009). Mathematical power of special-needs pupils: An ICT-based dynamic assessment format to reveal weak pupils’ learning potential. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 273–284.10.1111/bjet.2009.40.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peltenburg, M., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Robitzsch, A. (2010). ICT-based dynamic assessment to reveal special education students’ potential in mathematics. Research Papers in Education, 25, 319–334. doi:10.1080/02671522.2010.49814810.1080/02671522.2010.498148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, N., Turner, J. C., & Meyer, D. K. (2006). Classrooms as contexts for motivated learning. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 327–348). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, A., Minnaert, A., & Opdenakker, M.-C. (2014) Motivation in educational interventions: A systematic review exploring the concept in relation to intervention outcomes. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Resing, W. C. M. (1990). Intelligentie en leerpotentieel. Een onderzoek naar het leerpotentieel van jonge leerlingen uit het basis- en speciaal onderwijs [Intelligence and learning potential. A study on the learning potential of young children from primary schools and special education]. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Resing, W. C. M. (2006). Using children’s ‘ability to learn’ in diagnosis and assessment. Educational & Child Psychology, 23, 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Resing, W. C. M., Tunteler, E., de Jong, F. M., & Bosma, T. (2009). Dynamic testing in indigenous and ethnic minority children. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 445–450. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.03.00610.1016/j.lindif.2009.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruijssenaars, A. J. J. M. (2001). Leerproblemen en leerstoornissen. Remedial teaching en behandeling. Hulpschema’s voor opleiding en praktijk [Learning difficulties and learning disabilities. Remedial teaching and treatment. Frameworks for education and practice]. Rotterdam: Lemniscaat.
   Google Scholar
• Ryba, K. (1998). Dynamic assessment and programme planning for students with intellectual disabilities. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 27, 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlatter, C., & Büchel, F. P. (2000). Detecting reasoning abilities of persons with moderate mental retardation: The analogical reasoning learning test (ARLT). In C. S. Lidz & J. Elliott (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 155–186). New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Shamir, A., & Tzuriel, D. (2004). Children’s mediational teaching style as a function of intervention for cross-age peer-mediation. School Psychology International, 25, 59–78.10.1177/0143034304024782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E. S. (1987). Behavioral assessment in school psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E. S., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2000). Behavioral assessment in schools. Theory, research, and clinical foundations. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., Ngorosho, D., Tantufuye, E., Mbise, A., Nokes, C., Jukes, M., & Bundy, D. A. (2002). Assessing intellectual potential in rural Tanzanian school children. Intelligence, 30, 141–162.10.1016/S0160-2896(01)00091-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L. (1995a). Effects of dynamic testing on the classification of learning-disabilities – The predictive and discriminant validity of the Swanson cognitive processing test (S-cpt). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 13, 204–229.10.1177/073428299501300301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L. (1995b). Using the cognitive processing test to assess ability: Development of a dynamic assessment measure. School Psychology Review, 24, 672–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L. (2011). Dynamic testing, working memory, and reading comprehension growth in children with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 358–371. doi:10.1177/002221941140786610.1177/0022219411407866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L., & Howard, C. B. (2005). Children with reading disabilities: Does dynamic assessment help in the classification? Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 17–34.10.2307/4126971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, P., & Roodenburg, J. (2013). Extensions of cognitive ability assessment with dynamic testing using self-regulated learning. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12, 230–250. doi:10.1891/1945-8959.12.2.230
   Google Scholar
• Tiekstra, M., Hessels, M. G. P., & Minnaert, A. E. M. G. (2009). Learning capacity in adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities. Psychological Reports, 105, 804–814. doi:10.2466/PR0.105.3.804-81410.2466/PR0.105.3.804-814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzuriel, D. (2000). The seria-think instrument: Development of a dynamic test for young children. School Psychology International, 21, 177–194.10.1177/0143034300212005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzuriel, D., & Kaufman, R. (1999). Mediated learning and cognitive modifiability: Dynamic assessment of young Ethiopian immigrant children to Israel. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 359–380.10.1177/0022022199030003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. D. (1996). Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis. Higher Education, 31, 25–50.10.1007/BF00129106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., Odgers, C., Grisso, T., & Tillbrook, C. (2007). Teaching adolescents and adults about adjudicative proceedings: A comparison of pre- and post-teaching scores on the MacCAT-CA. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 419–432.10.1007/s10979-006-9069-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., Byrnes, J. P., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Development during early and middle adolescence. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. (1998). Matching student needs to instruction. In S. A. Vogel & S. Reder (Eds.), Learning disabilities, literacy and adult education (pp. 191–212). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Woide, N., Beckmann, J. F., Elliott, J. G., & Guthke, J. (2005). Effects of feedback: Individual differences in the ability to benefit from feedback. Paper for the 10th Conference of the International Association on Cognitive Education and Psychology, University of Durham, England.
   Google Scholar