Publication Cover
Educational Psychology
An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology
Volume 36, 2016 - Issue 1
162
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Students’ conscious unknowns about artefacts and natural objects

, , , &
Pages 176-190 | Received 13 Sep 2013, Accepted 15 Apr 2014, Published online: 12 May 2014

References

  • Ahn, W., Kim, N. S., Lassaline, M. E., & Dennis, M. J. (2000). Causal status as a determinant of feature centrality. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 361–416.10.1006/cogp.2000.0741
  • Bammer, G., & Smithson, M. (Eds.). (2008). Uncertainty and risk: Multidisciplinary perspectives. London: Earthscan.
  • Barr, R., & Caplan, L. (1987). Category representations and their implications for category structure. Memory & Cognition, 15, 397–418.10.3758/BF03197730
  • Barton, M. E., & Komatsu, L. K. (1989). Defining features of natural kinds and artifacts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 433–447.10.1007/BF01067309
  • Béjoint, H. (1997). Regards sur la définition en terminologie [Perspectives on definition in terminology]. Cahiers de Lexicologie, 70, 19–26.
  • Berlyne, D. E., & Frommer, F. D. (1966). Some determinants of the incidence and content of children’s questions. Child Development, 37, 177–189.10.2307/1126438
  • Chaffin, R., Herrmann, D. J., & Winston, M. (1988). An empirical taxonomy of part-whole relations: Effects of part-whole relation type on relation identification. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3, 17–48.10.1080/01690968808402080
  • Dillon, J. T. (1990). The practice of questioning. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Fellbaum, C. (1998). Wordnet: An electronic lexical database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gelman, S. A. (1988). The development of induction within natural kind and artifact categories. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 65–95.10.1016/0010-0285(88)90025-4
  • Gentner, D. (1981). Some interesting differences between verbs and nouns. Cognition and Brain Theory, 4, 161–178.
  • Getzels, J. W. (1975). Problem finding and the inventiveness of solutions. Journal of Creative Behavior, 9, 13–18.
  • Glenberg, A. M., & Epstein, W. (1985). Calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 702–718.
  • Graesser, A. C., Lu, S., Olde, B., Cooper-Pye, E., & Whitten, S. N. (2005). Question asking and eye tracking during cognitive disequilibrium: Comprehending illustrated texts on devices when the devices break down. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1235–1247.10.3758/BF03193225
  • Graesser, A. C., & Olde, B. A. (2003). How does one know whether a person understands a device? The quality of the questions the person asks when the device breaks down. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 524–536.10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.524
  • Gross, M. (2007). The unknown in process: Dynamic connections of ignorance, non-knowledge and related concepts. Current Sociology, 55, 742–759.10.1177/0011392107079928
  • Hacker, D., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. (1998). Metacognition in educational theory and practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Ishiwa, K., Sanjosé, V., & Otero, J. (2013). Questioning and reading goals: Information-seeking questions asked on scientific texts read under different task conditions. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 502–520.
  • Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kemler-Nelson, D. G., Egan, L. C., & Holt, M. B. (2004). When children ask, ‘What is it?’ What do they want to know about artifacts? Psychological Science, 15, 384–389.10.1111/psci.2004.15.issue-6
  • Keys, C. W. (1998). A study of grade six students generating questions and plans for open-ended science investigations. Research in Science Education, 28, 301–316.10.1007/BF02461565
  • Kirch, S. A. (2009). Identifying and resolving uncertainty as a mediated action in science: A comparative analysis of the cultural tools used by scientists and elementary science students at work. Science Education, 94, 308–335.
  • Landau, S. I. (2001). Dictionaries. The art and craft of lexicography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.10.2307/2529310
  • Lee, H., & Cho, Y. (2007). Factors affecting problem finding depending on degree of structure of problem situation. The Journal of Educational Research, 101, 113–123.10.3200/JOER.101.2.113-125
  • Lin, L., & Zabrucky, K. (1998). Calibration of comprehension: Research and implications for education and instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 345–391.10.1006/ceps.1998.0972
  • Maki, R. H., & Berry, S. L. (1984). Metacomprehension of text material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 663–679.
  • Maki, R. H., Jonas, D., & Kallod, M. (1994). The relationship between comprehension and metacomprehension ability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 126–129.10.3758/BF03200769
  • Malt, B. C., & Johnson, E. C. (1992). Do artifact concepts have cores? Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 195–217.10.1016/0749-596X(92)90011-L
  • Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32, 1–19.10.1207/s15326985ep3201_1
  • McArthur, T. (1986). Worlds of reference: Lexicography, Learning and language from the clay tablet to the computer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Medin, D. L., Lynch, E. B., & Solomon, K. O. (2000). Are there kinds of concepts? Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 121–147.10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.121
  • Melčuk, I. (1988). Semantic description of lexical units in an exploratory combinatorial dictionary: Basic principles and heuristic criteria. International Journal of Lexicography, 1, 165–188.
  • Metz, K. (2004). Children’s understanding of scientific inquiry: Their conceptualization of uncertainty in investigations of their own design. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 219–290.10.1207/s1532690xci2202_3
  • Miller, G. A. (1990). Nouns in Wordnet: A lexical inheritance system. International Journal of Lexicography, 3, 245–264.10.1093/ijl/3.4.245
  • Miller, G. A. (1991). The science of words. New York, NY: Scientific American Library.
  • Miyake, N., & Norman, D. A. (1979). To ask a question, one must know enough to know what is not known. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 357–364.10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90200-7
  • Otero, J. (2009). Question generation and anomaly detection in texts. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 47–59). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Otero, J., & Ishiwa, K. (in press). Cognitive processing of conscious ignorance. In D. N. Rapp & J. L. G. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Pieschl, S. (2009). Metacognitive calibration – An extended conceptualization and potential applications. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 3–31.10.1007/s11409-008-9030-4
  • Powell, M., Dunwoody, S., Griffin, R., & Neuwirth, K. (2007). Exploring lay uncertainty about an environmental health risk. Public Understanding of Science, 16, 323–343.10.1177/0963662507074491
  • Prager, J. M., Chu-Carroll, J., & Czuba, K. (2001, November). Use of wordnet hypernyms for answering what-is questions. In Proceedings of the 10th Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-10), Gaithersburg, MD.
  • Proctor, R., & Schiebinger, L. (Eds.). (2008). Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Runco, M. A. (1994). Problem finding, problem solving and creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
  • Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1, 9–20. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002
  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1999). Test based and knowldege based questioning by children. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 177–199.
  • Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and instruction, 13, 141–156.10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00017-8
  • Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2003). Self-regulation and learning. In W. M. Reynolds & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, Vol. 7: Educational psychology (pp. 59–78). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Simons, K. D., & Klein, J. D. (2007). The impact of scaffolding and student achievement levels in a problem-based learning environment. Instructional Science, 35, 41–72.10.1007/s11251-006-9002-5
  • Stocking, S. H., & Holstein, L. S. (1993). Constructing and reconstructing scientific ignorance. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 15, 186–210.
  • Swanson, H. L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 306–314.10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.306
  • Tobias, S., & Everson, H. T. (2009). The importance of knowing what you know. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 107–128). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Van der Meij, H. (1990). Question asking: To know that you do not know is not enough. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 505–512.10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.505
  • Wiley, J., Griffin, T. D., & Thiede, K. W. (2005). Putting the comprehension in metacomprehension. The Journal of General Psychology, 132, 408–428.10.3200/GENP.132.4.408-428
  • Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 227–304). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Winston, M. E., Chaffin, R., & Herrmann, D. J. (1987). A taxonomy of part-whole relations. Cognitive Science, 11, 417–444.10.1207/s15516709cog1104_2

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.