Innovative learning and developments in motivation and achievement in upper primary school

References

• Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25, 5–11. doi:10.3102/0013189X02500400510.3102/0013189X025004005
   Google Scholar
• Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5, 243–260. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.00110.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.19110.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bast, J., & Reitsma, P. (1997). Mathew effects in reading: A comparison of latent growth curve models and simplex models with structured means. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 135–167. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_310.1207/s15327906mbr3202_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blok, H., Oostdam, R., & Peetsma, T. (2006). Het nieuwe leren in het basisonderwijs; een begripsanalyse en een verkenning van de schoolpraktijk [New learning in primary education: A concept analysis and an exploration of school practice]. Amsterdam: SCO-Kohnstamminstituut.
   Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld, P. C. (1992). Classroom learning and motivation: Clarifying and expanding goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 272–281. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.27210.1037/0022-0663.84.3.272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M. (1996). Self-regulated learning at the junction of cognition and motivation. European Psychologist, 1, 100–112. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.1.2.10010.1027/1016-9040.1.2.100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7, 161–186. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00015-110.1016/S0959-4752(96)00015-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M., & Niemivirta, M. (2000). Self-regulated learning: Finding a balance between learning goals and ego-protective goals. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 417–450). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50042-1
   Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M., de Koning, E., & Vedder, P. (2006). Goal-directed behavior and contextual factors in the classroom: An innovative approach to the study of multiple goals. Educational Psychologist, 41, 33–51. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4101_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolhuis, S. (2003). Towards process-oriented teaching for self-directed lifelong learning: A multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 13, 327–347. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00008-710.1016/S0959-4752(02)00008-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolhuis, S., & Voeten, M. J. M. (2001). Toward self-directed learning in secondary schools: What do teachers do? Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 837–855. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00034-810.1016/S0742-051X(01)00034-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, T. J., & Chen, P. P. (2009). Self-regulation, motivation, and math achievement in middle school: Variations across grade level and math context. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 291–314. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.04.00210.1016/j.jsp.2009.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & Masui, C. (2004). The CLIA-model: A framework for designing powerful learning environments for thinking and problem solving. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19, 365–384. doi:10.1007/BF0317321610.1007/BF03173216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P., & Kyriakides, L. (2007). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, J. F. (1993). Four misconceptions about authentic learning. Educational Leadership, 50, 78–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Kock, A., Sleegers, P., & Voeten, M. J. M. (2004). New learning and the classification of learning environments in secondary education. Review of Educational Research, 74, 141–170. doi:10.3102/0034654307400214110.3102/00346543074002141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lisi, R., & Golbeck, S. L. (1999). Implications of Piagetian theory for peer learning. In A. M. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 3–37). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Demirbas, O. O., & Demirkan, H. (2007). Learning styles of design students and the relationship of academic performance and gender in design education. Learning and Instruction, 17, 345–359. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.00710.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H. P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? Educational Research Review, 3, 101–129. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2008.02.00310.1016/j.edurev.2008.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driessen, G., Mulder, L., Ledoux, G., Roeleveld, J., & Van der Veen, I. (2009). Cohortonderzoek COOL 5-18 Technisch rapport basisonderwijs, eerste meting 2007/08 [Cohort study COOL 5-18: Technical report primary education, first wave 2007/08]. Nijmegen: ITS, Amsterdam: Kohnstamm Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, Th. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 170–198). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, O. D., Featherman, D. L., & Duncan, B. (1972). Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York, NY: Seminar Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, D., Elwood, J., Hey, V., & Maw, J. (Eds.). (1998). Failing boys? Issues in gender and achievement. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evers, A. (2002). COTAN tekstboek voor het onderwijs [COTAN test book for education]. Amsterdam: Boom Test Uitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• Feenstra, H., Kamphuis, F., Kleintjes, F., & Krom, R. (2010). Begrijpend lezen voor groep 3 tot en met 6. wetenschappelijke verantwoording [Reading comprehension for year 3 to 6: Scientific report]. Arnhem: CITO.
   Google Scholar
• Fosnot, C. T. (1996). Constructivism theory, perspectives, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J. (1982). Differences between student and teacher perceptions of actual and preferred classroom learning environment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4, 511–519. doi:10.2307/116366110.3102/01623737004004511
   Google Scholar
• Gijbels, D., Watering, G., Dochy, F., & Bossche, P. (2006). New learning environments and constructivism: The students’ perspective. Instructional Science, 34, 213–226. doi:10.1007/s11251-005-3347-z10.1007/s11251-005-3347-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 3–13. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.93.1.310.1037/0022-0663.93.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfried, A. E., Marcoulides, G. A., Gottfried, A. W., & Oliver, P. H. (2009). A latent curve model of parental motivational practices and developmental decline in math and science academic intrinsic motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 729–739. doi:10.1037/a001508410.1037/a0015084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gow, L., & Kember, D. (1993). Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to student learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 20–23. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01039.x10.1111/bjep.1993.63.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T. (1989). Principles of successful chapter 1 programs: A guidebook for rural educators. San Francisco, CA: Far West Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & VonSecker, C. (2000). Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 331–341. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hänze, M., & Berger, R. (2007). Cooperative learning, motivational effects, and student characteristics: An experimental study comparing cooperative learning and direct instruction in 12th grade physics classes. Learning and Instruction, 17, 29–41. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.00410.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99–136. doi:10.3102/0034654306600209910.3102/00346543066002099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedeker, D., Gibbons, R. D., & Waternaux, C. (1999). Sample size estimation for longitudinal designs with attrition: Comparing time-related contrasts between two groups. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 70–93.10.3102/10769986024001070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermans, P. (1995). Moroccan immigrants and school success. International Journal of Educational Research, 23, 33–43. doi:10.1016/0883-0355(95)93533-210.1016/0883-0355(95)93533-2
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, D. T. (1997). Motivation and contemporary socio-constructivist instructional perspectives. Educational Psychologist, 32, 175–193. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3203_310.1207/s15326985ep3203_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey, D. T., Moore, A. L., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2001). The motivational and academic consequences of elementary mathematics environments: Do constructivist innovations and reforms make a difference? American Educational Research Journal, 38, 611–652. doi:10.3102/0002831203800361110.3102/00028312038003611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D., & Reynolds, D. (2001). The past, present and future of school improvement: Towards the third age. British Educational Research Journal, 27, 459–475. doi:10.1080/0141192012007146110.1080/01411920120071461
   Google Scholar
• Hornstra, L., van der Veen, I., Peetsma, T., & Volman, M. (2013). Developments in motivation and achievement during primary school: A longitudinal study on group-specific differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 195–204. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.09.00410.1016/j.lindif.2012.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houtte, M. (2004). Why boys achieve less at school than girls: The difference between boys’ and girls’ academic culture. Educational Studies, 30, 159–173. doi:10.1080/030556903200015980410.1080/0305569032000159804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/1070551990954011810.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, G. (2003). Processes of decision-making in small learning groups. Learning and Instruction, 13, 255–269. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00039-110.1016/S0959-4752(01)00039-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73, 509–527. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.0042110.1111/cdev.2002.73.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 588–600. doi:10.1037/a0019682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jobe, J. B. (2000). Cognitive processes in self-report. In A. A. Stone, J. S. Turkkan, C. A. Bachrach, J. B. Jobe, H. S. Kurtzman, & V. S. Cain (Eds.), The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice (pp. 25–29). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C., & Engelhard, G. (1992). Gender, academic achievement, and preferences for cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning among African-American adolescents. The Journal of Psychology, 126, 385–392. doi:10.1080/00223980.1992.1054337110.1080/00223980.1992.10543371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Learning together and alone: Overview and meta‐analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22, 95–105. doi:10.1080/021887902022011010.1080/0218879020220110
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38, 365–379. doi:10.3102/0013189X09339057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Retrieved October 10, 2005, from http://www.cooplearn.org/pages/cl-methods.html
   Google Scholar
• Jungbluth, P., Peetsma, T., & Roeleveld, J. (1996). Leerlingprestaties en leerlinggedrag in het primair onderwijs [Student achievement and student behaviour in primary education]. Ubbergen: Tandem Felix.
   Google Scholar
• Koomen, K., Hornstra, L., Peetsma, T. T. D., & Van der Veen, I. (2011). Het nieuwe leren en taal: Een gelukkig paar? [Innovative learning and language: A happy couple?]. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2006). Who is the expert? Construct and criteria validity of student and teacher ratings of instruction. Learning Environments Research, 9, 231–251. doi:10.1007/s10984-006-9015-7
   Google Scholar
• Lamberigts, R., & Bergen, T. C. M. (2000). Teaching for active learning using a constructivist approach. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, K. L. (2012). Instructional practices and self-regulated learning in Chinese language classes. Educational Psychology, 32, 427–450. doi:10.1080/01443410.2012.67463410.1080/01443410.2012.674634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loyens, S. M. M., & Gijbels, D. (2008). Understanding the effects of constructivist learning environments: Introducing a multi-directional approach. Instructional Science, 36, 351–357. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9059-410.1007/s11251-008-9059-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maehr, M. L., & Braskamp, L. A. (1986). The motivation factor: A theory of personal investment. Lexington: Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J. (2009). Motivation and engagement across the academic life span: A developmental construct validity study of elementary school, high School, and university/college students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 794–824. doi:10.1177/001316440933221410.1177/0013164409332214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (2011). On qualitative differences in learning: I-outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., … Urdan, T. (2000). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scales. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (1998). Mplus (version 5.21) [Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M., Marks, H. M., & Gamoran, A. (1996). Authentic pedagogy and student performance. American Journal of Education, 104, 280–312.10.1086/444136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie, Y., & Lau, S. (2010). Differential relations of constructivist and didactic instruction to students’ cognition, motivation, and achievement. Learning and Instruction, 20, 411–423. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.04.00210.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolen, S. B. (2003). Learning environment, motivation, and achievement in high school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 347–368. doi:10.1002/tea.10080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, A. M. (2012). Constructivism. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, C. B. McCormick, G. M. Sinatra, & J. Sweller (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, Vol 1: Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 61–84). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/13273-00310.1037/13273-000
   Google Scholar
• Overmaat, M., & Ledoux, G. (2002). De kleur van de school: Een zoektocht naar succesfactoren op zwarte basisscholen [The color of the school: A search for success factors at “black” primary schools]. Pedagogiek, 21, 359–371.
   Google Scholar
• Pappas, S., Ginsburg, H. P., & Jiang, M. (2003). SES differences in young children’s metacognition in the context of mathematical problem solving. Cognitive Development, 18, 431–450. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(03)00043-110.1016/S0885-2014(03)00043-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philbin, M., Meier, E., Huffman, S., & Boverie, P. (1995). A survey of gender and learning styles. Sex Roles, 32, 485–494. doi:10.1007/BF0154418410.1007/BF01544184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24, 5–12. doi:10.3102/0013189X02400700510.3102/0013189X024007005
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92–104. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pol, J. V. D., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2011). Patterns of contingent teaching in teacher–student interaction. Learning and Instruction, 21, 46–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation: Controversies and new directions (pp. 373–404). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roeleveld, J., Mulder, L., & Paas, T. (2011). De gevolgen van een latere afname van de Cito Eindtoets Basisonderwijs [Consequences of later administration of the CITO final test in primary education]. Nijmegen: ITS, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen/Kohnstamm Instituut.
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, E., & Terwel, J. (1999). Constructivism and authentic pedagogy: State of the art and recent developments in the Dutch national curriculum in secondary education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31, 201–227. doi:10.1080/00220279918323210.1080/002202799183232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, E., Visser, J., & Terwel, J. (2003). Preferences for various learning environments: Teachers’ and parents’ perceptions. Learning Environments Research, 6, 77–110. doi:10.1023/A:102291591019810.1023/A:1022915910198
   Google Scholar
• Roeser, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. J. (2000). School as a context of early adolescents’ academic and social-emotional development: A summary of research findings. The Elementary School Journal, 100, 443–471. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086%2F49965010.1086/esj.2000.100.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, K. (2006). Effective teaching practices for students with and without learning difficulties: Issues and implications surrounding key findings and recommendations from the national inquiry into the teaching of literacy 1. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 99–115. doi:10.1080/19404150609546813
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salinas, M. F., & Garr, J. (2009). Effect of learner-centered education on the academic outcomes of minority groups. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 36, 226–237.
   Google Scholar
• Schuitema, J., Peetsma, T., & Van der Veen, I. (2011). Self-regulated learning and students’ perceptions of innovative and traditional learning environments: A longitudinal study in secondary education. Educational Studies, 38, 397–413. doi:10.1080/03055698.2011.643105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Seegers, G., Van Putten, C. M., & De Brabander, C. J. (2002). Goal orientation, perceived task outcome and task demands in mathematics tasks: Effects on students attitude in actual task settings. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 365–384. doi:10.1348/000709902320634366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severiens, S., & Dam, G. (1997). Gender and gender identity differences in learning styles. Educational Psychology, 17, 79–93. doi:10.1080/014434197017010510.1080/0144341970170105
   Google Scholar
• Shucksmith, J., Hendry, L. B., & Glendinning, A. (1995). Models of parenting: Implications for adolescent well-being within different types of family contexts. Journal of Adolescence, 18, 253–270. doi:10.1006/jado.1995.101810.1006/jado.1995.1018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, R. J., Van der Linden, J., & Duffy, T. (Eds.). (2000). New learning. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417–453. doi:10.3102/0034654307500341710.3102/00346543075003417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50, 315–342. doi:10.3102/0034654305000231510.3102/00346543050002315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H. W., & Newman, R. S. (1986). Long-term prediction of achievement and attitudes in mathematics and reading. Child Development, 57, 646–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, S. M., & Bond, M. H. (2002). A critical look at parenting research from the mainstream: Problems uncovered while adapting western research to non-western cultures. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 379–392. doi:10.1348/02615100232062038910.1348/026151002320620389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tharp, R. G. (1989). Psychocultural variables and constants: Effects on teaching and learning in schools. American Psychologist, 44, 349359. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.44.2.349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoonen, E. E., Sleegers, P. J., Oort, F. J., Peetsma, T. T., & Geijsel, F. P. (2011). How to improve teaching practices the role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 496–536. doi:10.1177/0013161X11400185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoonen, E. E. J., Sleegers, P. J. C., Peetsma, T. T. D., & Oort, F. J. (2010). Can teachers motivate students to learn? Educational Studies, 37, 1–16. doi:10.1080/03055698.2010.507008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, R. E., Van Lieshout, E. C. D. M., & Verhoeven, L. (2007). Gender-related effects of contemporary math instruction for low performers on problem-solving behavior. Learning and Instruction, 17, 42–54. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.00510.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolmie, A. K., Topping, K. J., Christie, D., Donaldson, C., Howe, C., Jessiman, E., Livingston, K., & Thurston, A. (2009). Social effects of collaborative learning in primary schools. Learning and Instruction, 20, 177–191. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomcho, T. J., & Foels, R. (2012). Meta-analysis of group learning activities: Empirically based teaching recommendations. Teaching of Psychology, 39, 159–169. doi:10.1177/009862831245041410.1177/0098628312450414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 57–70. doi:10.1023/A:100354831319410.1023/A:1003548313194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyre, P. (2006). The trouble with boys. New York, NY: Crown Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Urdan, T., & Schoenfelder, E. (2006). Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 331–349. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Veen, I., & Peetsma, T. T. D. (2009). The development in self-regulated learning behaviour of first-year students in the lowest level of secondary school in the Netherlands. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 34–46. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.03.00110.1016/j.lindif.2008.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veendrick, L., Tavecchio, L., & Doornenbal, J. (2004). Jongens als probleem. inleiding bij het themadeel [Boys as a problem. Introduction to the special issue]. Pedagogiek, 24, 12–24.
   Google Scholar
• Volet, S., & Järvelä, S. (Eds.). (2001). Motivation in learning contexts: Theoretical and methodological implications. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (1990). History of motivational research in Education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 616–622. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30(1), 1–35. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.00110.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.101510.1006/ceps.1999.1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R., & Davis-Kean, P. (2008). Development of achievement motivation. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Child and adolescent development: An advanced course (pp. 406–434). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2010). The impact of concept-oriented instruction reading instruction. In J. L. Meece & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Handbook of research on schools, schooling and human development (pp. 463–477). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. G. (2011). Constructivism in practical and historical context. In B. Reiser & J. Dempsey (Eds.), Current trends in instructional design and technology (3rd ed., pp. 45–54). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., & Hooymayers, H. P. (1992). Do teacher ideals distort the self-reports of their interpersonal behavior? Teaching and Teacher Education, 8, 47–58. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(92)90039-610.1016/0742-051X(92)90039-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., & Wang, L. (2009). Statistical power analysis for growth curve models using SAS. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1083–1094.10.3758/BRM.41.4.1083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar