Relationships among individual task self-efficacy, self-regulated learning strategy use and academic performance in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment

References

• Aguayo, D., Herman, K., Ojeda, L., & Flores, L. Y. (2011). Culture predicts Mexican Americans’ college self-efficacy and college performance. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 4, 79–89. doi:10.1037/a002250410.1037/a0022504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248–287.10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 154–196). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586–598. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.58610.1037/0022-3514.41.3.586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., & Wood, R. (1989). Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 805–814. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.80510.1037/0022-3514.56.5.805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunstein, J. C., & Glaser, C. (2011). Testing a path-analytic mediation model of how self-regulated writing strategies improve fourth graders’ composition skills: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 922–938. doi:10.1037/a002462210.1037/a0024622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. K. (1991). Goal levels, complex tasks, and strategy development: A review and analysis. Human Performance, 4, 1–31.10.1207/s15327043hup0401_1
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G., Gully, S. M., Whiteman, J. K., & Kilcullen, R. (2000). Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 834–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 205–249. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9191-610.1007/s10648-011-9191-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, T. J., & Chen, P. P. (2009). Self-regulation, motivation, and math achievement in middle school: Variations across grade level and math context. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 291–314. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.04.00210.1016/j.jsp.2009.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A., & Simmering, M. J. (1998). Conscientiousness, goal orientation, and motivation to learn during the learning process: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 654–665. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.65410.1037/0021-9010.83.4.654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Credé, M., & Phillips, L. (2011). A meta-analytic review of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 337–346. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.03.00210.1016/j.lindif.2011.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delfino, M., Dettori, G., & Persico, D. (2008). Self-regulated learning in virtual communities. Technology, Pedagogy & Education, 17, 195–205. doi:10.1080/14759390802383785
   Google Scholar
• DiBenedetto, M. K., & Bembenutty, H. (2013). Within the pipeline: Self-regulated learning, self-efficacy, and socialization among college students in science courses. Learning & Individual Differences, 23, 218–224. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diseth, Å. (2011). Self-efficacy, goal orientations and learning strategies as mediators between preceding and subsequent academic achievement. Learning & Individual Differences, 21, 191–195. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40, 117–128. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4002_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. New York, NY: Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, S. M., & MacDonald, S. (2007). Using past performance, proxy efficacy, and academic self-efficacy to predict college performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 2518–2531. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.0026810.1111/jasp.2007.37.issue-11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fast, L. A., Lewis, J. L., Bryant, M. J., Bocian, K. A., Cardullo, R. A., Rettig, M., & Hammond, K. A. (2010). Does math self-efficacy mediate the effect of the perceived classroom environment on standardized math test performance? Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 729–740. doi:10.1037/a001886310.1037/a0018863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, F. Q., Richards, K. A., & Jones, E. (2009). The motivation hub: Effects of goal setting and self-efficacy on effort and new product sales. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 29, 277–292. doi:10.2753/PSS0885-313490305
   Google Scholar
• Gamble, R., Sen, S., Brummel, B., Grove, F., Jorgenson, N., Guernsey, D., … Hughes, J. (2009). The SEREBRO project: Fostering creativity through collaboration and rewards. Paper presented at the EDUMas Workshop, part of 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), Budapest, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, I. L., & Ford, J. (2002). Training in organizations: Needs assessment, development, and evaluation (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, S. C., & Park, Y. S. (2012). An analysis of the relationship between self-study, private tutoring, and self-efficacy on self-regulated learning. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 9, 113–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, P. (2003, August). Autonomous learning zones. Paper presented at the meeting of the European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Padova, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48, 25–39.10.1080/00461520.2012.748006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgenson, N., Hale, M., & Gamble, R. (2011). SEREBRO: Facilitating student project team collaboration. Paper presented at the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering, Honolulu, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, A. J. (2004). Ethical issues in social psychology research. In C. Sansone, C. C. Morf, & A. T. Panter (Eds.), The Sage handbook of methods in social psychology (pp. 45–70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Brown, K. G., Salas, E., Smith, E. M., & Nason, E. H. (2001). Effects of training goals and goal orientation traits on multidimensional training outcomes and performance adaptability. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 85, 1–31. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhl, J. (1985). Volitional mediators of cognition-behavior consistency: Self-regulatory processes and action versus state orientation. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 100–128). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. W.-Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Students’ perceptions of collaboration, self-regulated learning, and information seeking in the context of internet-based learning and traditional learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 905–914.10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, E., & Wincent, J. (2011). Goal commitment and performance: An empirical study incorporating role-stress literature to reveal functional and dysfunctional influences. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 2634–2655. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00837.x10.1111/jasp.2011.41.issue-11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., Frederick, E., Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1984). Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 241–251. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.24110.1037/0021-9010.69.2.241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218.10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurittamont, W. (2012). The relationship among organizational commitment, self-efficacy and businesses performance: An empirical study of hotel businesses in Thailand. Journal of the Academy of Business & Economics, 12, 99–108.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. M., & Gully, S. M. (1997). Role of goal orientation, ability, need for achievement, and locus of control in the self-efficacy and goal-setting process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 792–802.10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic.10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students’ motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. In D. Schunk & J. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom: Causes and consequences (pp. 149–183). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731.10.3758/BF03206553
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 209–218. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.20910.1037/0022-0663.98.1.209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 353–387. doi:10.1037/a002683810.1037/a0026838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggs, M. L., Warka, J., Babasa, B., Betancourt, R., & Hooker, S. (1994). Development and validation of self-efficacy and outcome expectancy scales for job-related applications. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 793–802.10.1177/0013164494054003026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saab, N. (2012). Team regulation, regulation of social activities or co-regulation: Different labels for effective regulation of learning in CSCL. Metacognition and Learning, 7, 1–6. doi:10.1007/s11409-011-9085-510.1007/s11409-011-9085-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saab, N., van Joolingen, W., & van Hout-Wolters, B. (2012). Support of the collaborative inquiry learning process: Influence of support on task and team regulation. Metacognition and Learning, 7, 7–23. doi:10.1007/s11409-011-9068-610.1007/s11409-011-9068-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471–499. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.47110.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seijts, G. H., & Latham, G. P. (2011). The effect of commitment to a learning goal, self-efficacy, and the interaction between learning goal difficulty and commitment on performance in a business simulation. Human Performance, 24, 189–204. doi:10.1080/08959285.2011.58080710.1080/08959285.2011.580807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sins, P. H. M., van Joolingen, W. R., Savelsbergh, E. R., & van Hout-Wolters, B. (2008). Motivation and performance within a collaborative computer-based modeling task: Relations between students’ achievement goal orientation, self-efficacy, cognitive processing, and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3, 58–77. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.12.00410.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S., Kass, S. J., Rotunda, R. J., & Schneider, S. K. (2006). If at first you don’t succeed: Effects of failure on general and task-specific self-efficacy and performance. North American Journal of Psychology, 8, 171–182.
   Google Scholar
• Sookhai, F., & Budworth, M. (2010). The trainee in context: Examining the relationship between self-efficacy and transfer climate for transfer of training. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21, 257–272. doi:10.1002/hrdq.2004410.1002/hrdq.v21:3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, R. J., Payne, S. C., Horner, M. T., & Morey, L. C. (2012). Why borderline personality features adversely affect job performance: The role of task strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 32–36. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.08.02610.1016/j.paid.2011.08.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolli, A. P., & Schmidt, A. M. (2008). The role of feedback, casual attributions, and self-efficacy in goal revision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 692–701. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.69210.1037/0021-9010.93.3.692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H., Hadwin, A. F., & Perry, N. E. (2012). Metacognition and computer-supported collaborative learning. In C. Hmelo-Silver, C. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan, & A. O’Donnell (Eds.), The International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 462–479). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). San Diego, CA: Academic.10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50045-7
   Google Scholar
• Wu, X., Lowyck, J., Sercu, L., & Elen, J. (2012). Self-efficacy, task complexity and task performance: Exploring interactions in two versions of vocabulary learning tasks. Learning Environments Research, 15, 17–35. doi:10.1007/s10984-012-9098-210.1007/s10984-012-9098-2
   Google Scholar
• Ziedner, M., Boekaerts, M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Self-regulation: Directions and challenges for future research. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 749–768). San Diego, CA: Academic.10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50052-4
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329–339.10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–35). San Diego, CA: Academic.10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 845–862. doi:10.2307/116339710.3102/00028312031004845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 663–676. doi:10.2307/116326110.3102/00028312029003663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51–59.10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar