Key skills for science learning: the importance of text cohesion and reading ability

References

• Ackerman, P. L. (2003). Cognitive ability and non-ability trait determinants of expertise. Educational Researcher, 32, 15–20. doi:10.3102/0013189X03200801510.3102/0013189X032008015
   Google Scholar
• Akhondi, M., Malayeri, F. A., & Samad, A. A. (2011). How to teach expository text structure to facilitate reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 64, 368–372. doi:10.1598/RT.64.5.910.1598/RT.64.5.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory into Practice, 48, 12–19.10.1080/00405840802577544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Sinatra, G. M., & Loxterman, J. A. (1991). Revising social studies text from a text-processing perspective: Evidence of improved comprehensibility. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 251–276.10.2307/747763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, R., Ozuru, Y., Floyd, R., & McNamara, D. S. (2006). Children’s text comprehension. Effects of genre, knowledge, and text cohesion. In S. A. Barab, K. E. Hay, & D. T. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventh international conference of the learning sciences (pp. 37–42). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Best, R. M., Rowe, M. P., Ozuru, Y., & McNamara, D. S. (2005). Deep-level comprehension of science texts: The role of the reader and the text. Topics in Language Disorders, 25, 65–83.10.1097/00011363-200501000-00007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1993). Measures of self-esteem. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (3rd ed., pp. 115–160). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Bouquet, P., & Warglien, M. (1999). Mental models and local models semantics: The problem of information integration. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Science (pp. 169–178). Sienna, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. A., Fishco, V. V., & Hanna, G. (1993). Nelson–Denny reading test: Manual for scoring and interpretation, forms G&H. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (1984). The general/academic self-concept nomological network: A review of construct validation research. Review of Educational Research, 54, 427–456.10.3102/00346543054003427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K. (2003). Text comprehension and its relation to coherence and cohesion in children’s fictional narratives. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 335–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K., & Nash, H. M. (2011). The influence of connectives on young readers’ processing and comprehension of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 429–441. doi:10.1037/a002282410.1037/a0022824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2004). Reading comprehension difficulties. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of children’s literacy (pp. 313–338). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Catts, H., Adlof, S. M., & Weismer, S. E. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 278–293.10.1044/1092-4388(2006/023)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, K. M. T., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2002). Reading ability and the performance of African American graduate students in research methodology courses. The Journal of College Literacy and Learning, 31, 39–52. doi:10.1.1.150.6897
   Google Scholar
• Council of Chief State School Officers & National Governors Association. (2010). Common standard for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/the-standards
   Google Scholar
• Crothers, L. M., Hughes, T. L., & Morine, K. A. (2008). Theory and cases in school-based consultation: A resource for school psychologists, school counselors, special educators, and other mental health professionals. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., & Hannon, B. (2001). Using working memory theory to investigate the construct validity of multiple-choice reading comprehension tests such as the SAT. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 208–223.10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degand, L., Lefèvre, N., & Bestgen, Y. (1999). The impact of connectives and anaphoric expressions on expository discourse comprehension. Document Design, 1, 39–51. doi:10.1075/dd.1.1.06deg10.1075/dd
   Google Scholar
• Degand, L., & Sanders, T. (2002). The impact of relational markers on expository text comprehension in L1 and L2. Reading and Writing, 15, 757–739. doi:10.1023/A:1020932715838
   Google Scholar
• Ferstl, E. C., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2001). The role of coherence and cohesion in text comprehension: An event-related fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 325–340. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00007-610.1016/S0926-6410(01)00007-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gadd, K. (Ed.). (2005). AQA GCSE science: For AQA GCSE science A & B. London: Collins Education, Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., Hoover, W. A., & Peterson, C. L. (1996). Some observations on a simple view of reading. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties (pp. 1–13). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2010). Coh-Metrix: Providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics. Educational Researcher, 40, 223–224. doi:10.3102/0013189X11413260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guay, F., Marsh, H. W., & Boivin, M. (2003). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Developmental perspectives on their causal ordering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 124–136. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.12410.1037/0022-0663.95.1.124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S. S., Basran, J., Paterson, K. B., Kowalski, R., Filik, R., & Maltby, J. (2014). Individual differences in the effectiveness of text cohesion for science text comprehension. Learning and Individual differences, 29, 74–80.10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S. S., Kowalski, R., Paterson, K. B., Basran, J., Filik, R., & Maltby, J. (in press). Local text cohesion, reading ability and individual science aspirations: Key factors influencing comprehension in science classes. British Educational Research Journal. doi:10.1002/berj.3134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawes, K., Heerman, C. E., Lamb, B., Lowenstein, C. K., & Seltzer, K. N. (1982). Correlations of scores on the Nelson–Denny reading test, form E, and measures of academic aptitude, academic achievement, readers’ attitude, and students’ self-concept. Psychological Reports, 51, 229–230.10.2466/pr0.1982.51.1.229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306–340.10.1037/0096-3445.110.3.306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. J. (1980). Mental models in cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 4, 71–115.10.1207/s15516709cog0401_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzir, T., Lesaux, N. K., & Kim, Y. (2009). The role of reading self-concept and home literacy practices in fourth grade reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22, 261–276. doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9112-810.1007/s11145-007-9112-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., White, M. J., & Lynch, J. S. (2007). Preschool and early elementary comprehension: Skill development and strategy interventions. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 27–45). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., Neter, J., & Li, W. (2004). Applied linear statistical models (5th ed.). Chicago, IL: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Mak, W. M., & Sanders, T. J. (2013). The role of causality in discourse processing: Effects of expectation and coherence relations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 1414–1437. doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.70842310.1080/01690965.2012.708423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maki, R. H., & Berry, S. L. (1984). Metacomprehension of text material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 663–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1990a). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and academic achievement: A multiwave, longitudinal panel analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 646–656. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.64610.1037/0022-0663.82.4.646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1990b). A multidimensional, hierarchical model of self-concept: Theoretical and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 77–172. doi:10.1007/BF0132217710.1007/BF01322177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1992). Self-description questionnaire II: Manual. New South Wales: University of Western Sydney, Macarthur, Faculty of Education, Publication Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1993). Academic self-concept. Theory measurement and research. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 4, pp. 59–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (2007). Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice: The role of self-concept in educational psychology. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Byrne, B. M., & Yeung, A. S. (1999). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement: Reanalysis of a pioneering study and revised recommendations. Educational Psychologist, 34, 155–167.10.1207/s15326985ep3403_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. (1997). Academic self-concept: Beyond the dustbowl. In G. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of classroom assessment: Learning, achievement, and adjustment (pp. 131–198). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective. Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 133–163. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00010.x10.1111/ppsc.2006.1.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & Martin, A. J. (2011). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Relations and causal ordering. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 59–77. doi:10.1348/000709910X50350110.1348/000709910X503501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & Yeung, A. S. (1998). Top–down, bottom–up, and horizontal models: The direction of causality in multidimensional, hierarchical self-concept models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 509–527.10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maury, P., & Teisserenc, A. (2005). The role of connectives in science text comprehension and memory. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 489–512. doi:10.1080/0169096044400015110.1080/01690960444000151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S. (2009). The importance of teaching reading strategies. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, The International Dyslexia Association, 35, 34–40.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Kendeou, P. (2011). Translating advances in reading comprehension towards secondary school science in England. Research in Science and Technological Education, 23, 41–57.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247–288. doi:10.1080/0163853960954497510.1080/01638539609544975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., McCarthy, P. M., & Graesser, A. C. (2010). Coh-Metrix: Capturing linguistic features of cohesion. Discourse Processes, 47, 292–330.10.1080/01638530902959943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Ozuru, Y., & Floyd, R. G. (2011). Comprehension challenges in the fourth grade: The roles of text cohesion, text genre, and readers’ prior knowledge. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4, 229–257.
   Google Scholar
• Millis, K. K., Golding, J. M., & Barker, G. (1995). Causal connectives increase inference generation. Discourse Processes, 20, 29–49. doi:10.1080/0163853950954493010.1080/01638539509544930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millis, K. K., & Just, M. A. (1994). The influence of connectives on sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 128–147. doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.100710.1006/jmla.1994.1007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, G. L. (1984). Establishing and accessing referents in discourse. Memory and Cognition, 12, 489–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordman, L. G., Vonk, W., & Kempff, H. J. (1992). Causal inferences during the reading of expository texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 573–590.10.1016/0749-596X(92)90029-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E. J., Rizzella, M. L., Albrecht, J. E., & Halleran, J. G. (1998). Situation models in language and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). Reversing the reverse cohesion effect: Good texts can be better for strategic, high-knowledge readers. Discourse Processes, 43, 121–152. doi:10.1080/0163853070933689510.1080/01638530709336895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofsted. (2012). Moving English forward: Action to raise standards in English. Retrieved from http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/moving-english-forward
   Google Scholar
• Ozuru, Y., Briner, S., Best, R., & McNamara, D. S. (2010). Contributions of self-explanation to comprehension of high- and low-cohesion texts. Discourse Processes, 47, 641–667. doi:10.1080/0163853100362880910.1080/01638531003628809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 19, 228–242. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parliamentary Office of Science & Technology. (2009). Teaching children to read. Postnote, number 345. Retrieved from www.parliament.uk/parlimentary_offices/post/pubs2009.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, A. C. (1994). Psycholinguistics and reading ability. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 849–894). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459–470. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-410.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4
   Google Scholar
• Pullmann, H., & Allik, J. (2000). The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Its dimensionality, stability and personality correlates in Estonian. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 701–715.10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00132-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, R. W., Fraley, R. C., Roberts, B. W., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). A longitudinal study of personality change in young adulthood. Journal of Personality, 69, 617–640. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.69415710.1111/1467-6494.694157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. (1986). Conceiving the self. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
   Google Scholar
• Rugg, M. D. (1985). The effects of semantic priming and word repetition on event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 22, 642–647.10.1111/psyp.1985.22.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, T., & Noordman, L. (2002). The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing. Discourse Processes, 29, 37–60. doi:10.1207/S15326950dp2901_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatscheider, C., Harrell, E., & Buck, J. (2007). An individual differences approach to the study of reading comprehension. In R. K. Wagner, A. E. Muse, & K. R. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 249–275). New York, NY: The Gilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.10.3102/00346543046003407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M., Harkness, D., & Stewart, S. T. (1997). Constructing inferences in expository text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 24, 199–228.10.1080/01638539709545013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinakon, W., & Nahathai, W. (2012). A comparison of reliability and construct validity between the original and revised versions of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Psychiatry Investigation, 9, 54–58. doi:10.4306/pi.2012.9.1.5410.4306/pi.2012.9.1.54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, J. C., Dubois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39, 111–133. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3902_310.1207/s15326985ep3902_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P. (1994). Comprehension and memory of narrative texts. In M. A. Gernsbacker (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 539–588). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, C. R., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2004). Co-reference and reasoning. Memory and Cognition, 32, 96–106. doi:10.3758/BF03195823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Oliver, J. S., & Staver, J. (2008). Self-concept and science achievement: Investigating a reciprocal relation model across the gender classification in a crosscultural context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 711–725.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 49–78. doi:10.1007/BF0220902410.1007/BF02209024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, P. (1982). The Nelson–Denny reading test as a predictor of college freshman grades. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 575–583.10.1177/001316448204200222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yara, P. O. (2010). Students’ self-concept and mathematics achievement in some secondary schools in southwestern Nigeria. European Journal of Social Sciences, 13, 127–132.
   Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.16210.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Singer, M. (2003). Text comprehension. In A. C. Graesser, M. A. Gernsbacher, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 83–121). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar