The effect of manipulatives on mathematics achievement across different learning styles

References

• Abiodullah, M., & Akbar, R. A. (2010). A study of achievement in different mathematics concepts in grade III students of public schools in Punjab, Pakistan. Journal of Elementary Education, 20, 47–55.
   Google Scholar
• Arslan, B., & Babadoğan, C. (2005). Relationships between learning style preferences and gender, age and success level at 7th and 8th grade. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 21, 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Barmeyer, C. I. (2004). Learning styles and their impact on cross-cultural training: An international comparison in France, Germany and Quebec. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 28, 577–594.10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatti, R., & Bart, W. M. (2013). On the effect of learning style on scholastic achievement. Current Issues in Education, 16. Retrieved from http://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/1121
   Google Scholar
• Biçer, M. (2010). The relationship between learning styles and grade levels, gender, academic achievement of students from 6th, 7th, and 8th grades ( Unpublished master’s thesis), Yıldız Technical University, Istanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Boggan, M., Harper, S., & Whitmire, A. (2010). Using manipulatives to teach elementary mathematics. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 3, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom, R. P, Olfman, L., & Sein, M. K. (1988, April 7–8). The Importance of individual differences in end-user training: The case for learning style. Proceedings of the 1988 ACM SIGCPR Conference on the Management of Information Systems Personnel, College Park, MD, pp. 133–141.
   Google Scholar
• Bouck, E. C., & Flanagan, S. M. (2010). Virtual manipulatives: What they are and how teachers can use them? Intervention in School Clinic, 45, 186–191.10.1177/1053451209349530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C. (2011). Assessing the distribution of learning and adaptive styles in an MBA program. In S. Rayner & E. Cools (Eds.), Style differences in cognition, learning, and management: Theory, research and practice (pp. 99–114). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, B. A., & Hamm, E. M. (2011). A comparison of concrete and virtual manipulative use in third and fourth-grade mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 111, 256–261.10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00086.x
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y. H., Cheng, J. T., & Chen, D. J. (2012). The effect of multimedia computer assisted instruction and learning style on learning achievement. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science & Applications, 1, 24–35.
   Google Scholar
• Claxton, C. S., & Murrell, P. M. (1987). Learning styles: Implications for improving educational practices (ASHE-ERIC/Higher Education Report No. 4). Washington, DC: George Washington University.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H. (1999). Concrete manipulatives, concrete ideas. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1, 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., & McMillen, S. (1996). Rethinking concrete manipulatives. Teaching Children Mathematics, 2, 270–279.
   Google Scholar
• Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. Retrieved from http://nwresearch.wikispaces.com/file/view/Coffield+learning+styles.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coker, C. A. (2000). Consistency of learning styles of undergraduate athletic training students in the traditional classroom versus the clinical setting. Journal of Athletic Training, 35, 441–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, T. D. (2013). Learning styles and admission criteria as predictors of academic performance of college freshmen. Institute for Learning Styles Research Journal, 1, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Dana-Picard, T., Kidron, I., Komar, M., & Steiner, J. (2006). ICT-aided engineering courses: A multi-campus course management. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31, 373–381.10.1080/03043790600676083
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S. M., Rutledge, C. M., & Davies, T. C. (1997). The impact of student learning styles on interviewing skills and academic performance. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 9, 131–135.10.1080/10401339709539827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, W., & Rutherford, B. (1984). Classroom research on matching learning and teaching styles. Theory into Practice, 23, 20–25.10.1080/00405848409543085
   Google Scholar
• Durmuş, S., & Karakirik, E. (2006). Virtual manipulatives in mathematics education: A theoretical framework. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5, 117–123.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, B. S., & Korth, S. J. (1998). A framework for learning to work in teams. Journal of Education for Business, 74, 28–33.10.1080/08832329809601657
   Google Scholar
• Gencel, İ. E. (2006). Learning styles, instruction based on Kolb’s experiential learning theory, attitude and social studies achievement ( Unpublished doctoral thesis). Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir.
   Google Scholar
• Gilakjani, A. P. (2012). A match or mismatch between learning styles of the learners and teaching styles of the teachers. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 4, 51–60.10.5815/ijmecs
   Google Scholar
• Gurpinar, E., Bati, H., & Tetik, C. (2011). Learning styles of medical students change in relation to time. AJP: Advances in Physiology Education, 35, 307–311.10.1152/advan.00047.2011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. W. (1997). Cognitive styles and technology-based education. Journal Of Technology Studies, 23, 14–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J., & Allinson, C. W. (1996). The implications of learning styles for training and development: A discussion of the matching hypothesis. British Journal of Management, 7, 63–73.10.1111/bjom.1996.7.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M., Kneale, P., & Bradbeer, J. (2005). Learning styles among geography undergraduates: An international comparison. Area, 37, 30–42.10.1111/area.2005.37.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holley, J. H., & Jenkins, E. K. (1993). The relationship between student learning style and performance on various test question formats. Journal of Education for Business, 68, 301–308.10.1080/08832323.1993.10117632
   Google Scholar
• Isemonger, I., & Sheppard, C. (2003). Learning styles. RELC Journal, 34, 195–222.10.1177/003368820303400205
   Google Scholar
• JilardiDamavandi, A., Mahyuddin, R., Elias, H., Daud, S. M., & Shabani, J. (2011). Academic achievement of students with different learning styles. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 3, 186–192.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C., Reichard, C., & Mokhtari, K. (2003). Are students’ learning styles discipline specific? Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 27, 363–375.10.1080/713838162
   Google Scholar
• Kablan, Z., & Kaya, S. (2013). Science achievement in TIMSS cognitive domains based on learning styles. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 53, 97–114.10.14689/ejer
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experiencies as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1999). The Kolb Learning Style Inventory. Version 3. Boston, MA: Hay Group.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C. (2001). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles, 1, 227–247.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4, 193–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2009). The learning way: Meta-cognitive aspects of experiential learning. Simulation & Gaming, 40, 297–327.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A., & Wolfe, D. (1981). Professional education and career development: A cross-sectional study of adaptive competencies in experiential learning ( Final report NIE G-77-0053, ERIC No. ED209493 CE030519). Cleveland: Case western Reserve University.
   Google Scholar
• Kurbal, S. S. (2011). An investigation of mathematics achievement of eighth grade students with respect to their learning styles (Unpublished master’s thesis). The Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Kvan, T., & Jia, Y. (2005). Students’ learning styles and their correlation with performance in architectural design studio. Design Studies, 26, 19–34.10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letele, M. J., Alexander, G., & Swanepoel, Z. I. (2013). Matching/mismatching of teaching and learning styles in rural learning ecologies of lesotho: Does it enhance academic achievement. The Journal of Human Ecology, 41, 263–273.
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, E., Tirosh, D., & Tsamir, P. (2006). Mathematically and practically-based explanations: Individual preferences and sociomathematical norms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4, 319–344.10.1007/s10763-005-9011-x
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, E., Tsamir, P., & Tirosh, D. (2010). Mathematically based and practically based explanations in the elementary school: Teachers’ preferences. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 345–369.10.1007/s10857-010-9142-z
   Google Scholar
• Liu, M., & Reed, W. M. (1994). The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 10, 419–434.10.1016/0747-5632(94)90038-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loo, R. (1997). Using Kolb’s learning style ınventory (LSI 1985) in the classroom. Proceedings of the Association of Management, 15, 47–51.
   Google Scholar
• Lovelace, M. K. (2005). Meta-analysis of experimental research based on the Dunn and Dunn model. The Journal of Educational Research, 98, 176–183.10.3200/JOER.98.3.176-183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, T., Woelfl, N., Steele, D. J., & Hanssen, C. (1998). Learning style influences student examination performance. The American Journal of Surgery, 176, 62–66.10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00107-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainemelis, C., Boyatzis. R.E., & Kolb, D.A. (1999). Learning styles and adaptive flexibility: Testing experiential learning theory (Working Paper 99-7). Department of Organizational Behavior, Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland.
   Google Scholar
• Mainemelis, C., Boyatzis, R., & Kolb, D. A. (2002). Learning styles and adaptive flexibility: Testing experiential learning theory. Management Learning, 33, 5–33.10.1177/1350507602331001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moallem, M. (2007). Accommodating ındividual differences in the design of online learning environments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40, 217–245.10.1080/15391523.2007.10782506
   Google Scholar
• Newland, J. R., & Woelfl, N. N. (1992). Learning style inventory and academic performance of students in general pathology. Bulletin of Pathology Education, 17, 77–81.
   Google Scholar
• Olkun, S. (2003). Comparing computer versus concrete manipulatives in learning 2d geometry. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 22, 43–56.10.1501/0000984
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Daley, C. E. (1998). Similarity of learning styles of students and a teacher in achievement in a research methods course. Psychological Reports, 82, 163–168.10.2466/pr0.1998.82.1.163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orhun, N. (2007). An investigation into the mathematics achievement and attitude towards mathematics with respect to learning style according to gender. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38, 321–333.10.1080/00207390601116060
   Google Scholar
• Özkan, Ş., Sungur, S., & Tekkaya, C. (2004). The effect of tenth graders’ learning style preferences their biology achievement. Education and Science, 29, 75–79.
   Google Scholar
• Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9, 105–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rush, G. M., & Moore, D. M. (1991). Effects of restructuring training and cognitive style. Educational Psychology, 11, 309–321.10.1080/0144341910110307
   Google Scholar
• Shandomo, H., & Zelkowski, J. (2008). The effects of mismatching teacher candidates with mentoring teachers. Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education, 1, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, J. E., Harb, J. N., & Terry, R. E. (1997). Combining Kolb learning styles and writing to learn in engineering classes. Journal of Engineering Education, 86, 93–101.10.1002/jee.1997.86.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Sowell, E. J. (1989). Effects of manipulative materials in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 498–505.10.2307/749423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutliff, R. I., & Baldwin, V. (2001). Learning styles: Teaching technology subjects can be more effective. The Journal of Technology Studies, 27, 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Suydam, M. N., & Higgins, J. L. (1977). Activity-based learning in elementary school. Mathematics: Recommendations from research. Columbus: ERIC Center for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education, College of Education, Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Svinicki, M. D., & Dixon, N. M. (1987). The Kolb model modified for classroom activities. College Teaching, 35, 141–146.10.1080/87567555.1987.9925469
   Google Scholar
• Tulbure, C. (2011). Do different learning styles require differentiated teaching strategies? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 11, 155–159.10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.01.052
   Google Scholar
• White, K. M. (2012). The effect of an instructional model utilizing hands-on learning and manipulatives on math achievement of middle school students in Georgia (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Liberty University.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H. (1999). Basic skills versus conceptual understanding: A bogus dichotomy in mathematics education. Retrieved from www.aft.org/publications/american_educator/fall99/wu.pdf
   Google Scholar