Publication Cover
Educational Psychology
An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology
Volume 36, 2016 - Issue 9
1,514
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The appraisal of fear appeals as threatening or challenging: frequency of use, academic self-efficacy and subjective value

, &
Pages 1670-1690 | Received 19 Mar 2014, Accepted 02 Sep 2014, Published online: 26 Sep 2014

References

  • Assor, A., & Kaplan, H. (2001). Mapping the domain of autonomy support: Five important ways to enhance or undermine student’s experience of autonomy in learning. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 101–120). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Roth, G. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15, 397–413. doi:10.1016/jlearninstruc.2005.07.00810.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.008
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
  • Bélanger, J. J., Lafrenière, M. K., Vallerand, R. J., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2012). Driven by fear: The effect of success and failure information on passionate individuals’ performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 180–195. doi:10.1037/a0029585
  • Ben-Chaim, D., & Zoller, U. (2001). Self-perception versus students’ perception of teachers’ personal style in college science and mathematics courses. Research in Science Education, 31, 437–454. doi:10.1023/A:101317232917010.1023/A:1013172329170
  • Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Bong, M. (2001). Between- and within-domain relations of academic motivation among middle and high school students: Self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 23–34. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.2310.1037/0022-0663.93.1.23
  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1989). Effect of message repetition on argument processing, recall and persuasion. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 3–12. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1001_210.1207/s15324834basp1001_2
  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174794
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Covington, M. (1992). Making the grade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO978113917358210.1017/CBO9781139173582
  • Covington, M., & Müeller, K. J. (2001). Intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation: An approach/avoidance reformulation. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 157–176. doi:10.1023/A:100900921914410.1023/A:1009009219144
  • den Brok, P., Bergen, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2006). Convergence and divergence between students’ and teachers’ perceptions of instructional behaviour in Dutch secondary education. In D. L. Fisher & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to research on learning environments (pp. 125–160). Singapore: World Scientific.10.1142/5946
  • Department for Education (DfE). (2013). Schools, pupils and their characteristics (press release SFR 21/2013). London: HMSO.
  • Duriez, B., Meeus, J., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2012). Why are some people more susceptible to ingroup threat than others? The importance of a relative extrinsic to intrinsic value orientation. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 164–172. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.00310.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.003
  • Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). London: Guildford Press.
  • Eccles, J. S. (2007). Families, schools, and developing achievement related motivations and engagement. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization (pp. 665–691). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Eccles, J. S., O’Neill, S. A., & Wigfield, A. (2005). Ability self-perceptions and subjective task-values in adolescents and children. In K. A. Moore & L. H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 239–247). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Elliot, A. J., & Covington, M. (2001). Approach and avoidance motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 73–92. doi:10.1023/A:100900901823510.1023/A:1009009018235
  • Folkman, S. (2008). The case for positive emotions in the stress process. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 21, 3–14. doi:10.1080/10615800701740457
  • Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007). Girls and mathematics – A “hopeless” issue? A control-value approach to gender differences in emotions towards mathematics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22, 497–514. doi:10.1007/BF0317346810.1007/BF03173468
  • Gallagher, K. M., & Updegraff, J. A. (2012). Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43, 101–116. doi:10.1007/s12160-012-9446-610.1007/s12160-011-9308-7
  • Garcia-Marques, T., & Mackie, D. M. (2001). The feeling of familiarity as a regulator of persuasive processing. Social Cognition, 19, 9–34. doi:10.1521/soco.19.1.9.1895910.1521/soco.19.1.9.18959
  • Gentry, M., Gable, R. K., & Rizza, M. G. (2002). Students’ perceptions of classroom activities: Are there grade-level and gender differences? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 539–544. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.53910.1037/0022-0663.94.3.539
  • Heck, R. H., & Thomas, S. L. (2009). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques. Hove: Routledge.
  • De Jong, R., & Westerhof, K. (2001). The quality of student ratings of teacher behaviour. Learning Environments Research, 4, 51–85. doi:10.1023/A:101140260857510.1023/A:1011402608575
  • Karabenick, S. A., Woolley, M. E., Friedel, J. M., Bridget, V., Blazevski, J., Bonney, C. R., … Kelly, K. L. (2007). Cognitive processing of self-report items in educational research: Do they think what we mean? Educational Psychologist, 42, 37–41. doi:10.1080/00461520701416231
  • Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (1985). Power in the classroom III: Teacher communication techniques and messages. Communication Education, 34, 19–28. doi:10.1080/0363452850937857910.1080/03634528509378579
  • Kerssen-Griep, J., Gayle, B. M., & Preiss, R. W. (2006). Classroom interaction and educational outcome. In B. M. Gayle, R. W. Preiss, N. Burrell, & M. Allen (Eds.), Classroom interaction and instructional processes: A meta-analytic review (pp. 129–148). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2006). Who is the expert? Construct and criteria validity of student and teacher ratings of instruction. Learning Environments Research, 9, 231–251. doi:10.1007/s10984-006-9015-7
  • Lazarus, R. S. (2006). Stress and emotion. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Linnenbrink, E. A. (2008). The role of affect in student learning: A multidimensional approach to considering the interaction of affect, motivation and engagement. In P. A. Shutz. & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 107–124). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
  • Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., & Kunter, M. (2009). Assessing the impact of learning environments: How to use student ratings of classroom or school characteristics in multilevel modeling. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 120–131. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.12.00110.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.12.001
  • Mainhard, M. T., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2011). Coercive and supportive teacher behaviour: Within- and across-lesson associations with the classroom social climate. Learning and Instruction, 21, 345–354. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.03.00310.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.03.003
  • Maloney, E. K., Lapinski, M. K., & Witte, K. (2011). Fear appeals and persuasion: A review and update of the extended parallel process model. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 206–219. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00341.x10.1111/spco.2011.5.issue-4
  • Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., Morin, A. J. S., Abduljabbar, A. S., & Köller, O. (2012). Classroom climate and contextual effects: Conceptual and methodological issues in the evaluation of group-level effects. Educational Psychologist, 47, 106–124. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.67048810.1080/00461520.2012.670488
  • Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., & Nagengast, B. (2009). Doubly-latent models of school contextual effects: Integrating multilevel and structural equation approaches to control measurement and sampling error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 764–802. doi:10.1080/0027317090333366510.1080/00273170903333665
  • Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. J., & Cheng, J. H. S. (2008). A multilevel perspective on gender in classroom motivation and climate: Potential benefits of male teachers for boys? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 78–95. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.7810.1037/0022-0663.100.1.78
  • Martin, A. M. (2005). Motivating boys and motivating girls: Does teacher gender really make a difference? Australian Journal of Education, 49, 320–334. doi:10.1177/00049441050490030810.1177/000494410504900308
  • Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 351–373. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.00410.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.004
  • Moons, W. G., Mackie, D. M., & Garcia-Marques, T. (2009). The impact of repetition-induced familiarity on agreement with weak and strong arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 32–44. doi:10.1037/a001346110.1037/a0013461
  • Morton, T. A., Rabinovich, A., Marshall, D., & Bretschneider, P. (2011). The future that may (or may not) come: How framing changes responses to uncertainty in climate change communications. Global Environmental Change, 21, 103–109. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.01310.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.013
  • Morin, A. J. S., Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., & Scalas, L. F. (2014). Doubly latent multilevel analyses of classroom climate: An illustration. The Journal of Experimental Education, 82, 143–167. doi:10.1080/00220973.2013.76941210.1080/00220973.2013.769412
  • Nagengast, B., Marsh, H. W., Scalas, L. F., Xu, M. K., & Hau, K.-T. (2011). Who took the “×” out of expectancy-value theory? A psychological mystery, a substantive-methodological synergy, and a cross-national generalisation. Psychological Science, 22, 1058–1066. doi:10.1177/095679761141554010.1177/0956797611415540
  • Onion, A. J. (2004). What use is maths to me? A report on the outcomes from student focus groups. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 23, 189–194. doi:10.1093/teamat/23.4.18910.1093/teamat/23.4.189
  • Paulus, D. L., & Vazire, S. (2010). The self-report method. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224–239). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9029-910.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
  • Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2007). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: An integrative approach to emotions in education. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in Education (pp. 13–36). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-012372545-5/50003-4
  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Perry, R. P., Kramer, K., Hochstadt, M., & Molfenter, S. (2004). Beyond test anxiety: Development and validation of the test emotions questionnaire (TEQ). Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 17, 287–316. doi:10.1080/1061580041233130384710.1080/10615800412331303847
  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91–105. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3702_410.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
  • Pelletier, L. G., Séguin-Lévesque, C., & Legault, L. (2002). Pressure from above and pressure from below as determinants of teachers' motivation and teaching behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 186–196. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.94.1.18610.1037/0022-0663.94.1.186
  • Peters, G.-J. Y., Ruiter, R. A. C., & Kok, G. (2013). Threatening communication: A critical re-analysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory. Health Psychology Review, 7(sup1), S8–S31. doi:10.1080/17437199.2012.70352710.1080/17437199.2012.703527
  • Peugh, J. L. (2009). A practical guide to multilevel modelling. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 85–112. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.09.002
  • Pintrich, P. R., & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.3310.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
  • Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (1992). Teacher power in the classroom: Defining and advancing a program of research. In V. P. Richmond & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern (pp. 67–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Putwain, D. W. (2009). Assessment and examination stress in Key Stage 4. British Educational Research Journal, 35, 391–411. doi:10.1080/0141192080204440410.1080/01411920802044404
  • Putwain, D. W., & Best, N. (2011). Fear appeals in the primary classroom: Effects on test anxiety and test grade. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 580–584. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.07.00710.1016/j.lindif.2011.07.007
  • Putwain, D. W., & Best, N. (2012). Do highly test anxious students respond differentially to fear appeals made prior to a test? Research in Education, 88(2), 1–10. doi:10.7227/RIE.88.1.110.7227/RIE.88.1.1
  • Putwain, D. W., Sander, P., & Larkin, D.k (2013). Using the 2×2 framework of achievement goals to predict achievement emotions and academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 80–84. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.00610.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.006
  • Putwain, D. W., & Remedios, R. (2014). The scare tactic: Messages which contain fear appeals prior to a high-stakes test predict lower self-determined motivation and exam scores. School Psychology Quarterly, doi:10.1037/spq0000048
  • Putwain, D. W., & Roberts, C. M. (2009). The development of an instrument to measure teachers' use of fear appeals in the GCSE classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 643–661. doi:10.1348/000709909X42613010.1348/000709909X426130
  • Putwain, D. W., & Roberts, C. M. (2012). Fear and efficacy appeals in the classroom: The secondary teachers’ perspective. Educational Psychology, 32, 355–372. doi:10.1080/01443410.2012.65984510.1080/01443410.2012.659845
  • Putwain, D. W., & Symes, W. (2011a). Teachers’ use of fear appeals in the Mathematics classroom: Worrying or motivating students? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 456–474. doi:10.1348/2044-8279.00200510.1348/2044-8279.002005
  • Putwain, D. W., & Symes, W. (2011b). Perceived fear appeals and examination performance: Facilitating or debilitating outcomes? Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 227–232. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.02210.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.022
  • Putwain, D. W., & Symes, W. (2014). The perceived value of maths and academic self-efficacy in the appraisal of fear appeals used prior to a high-stakes test as threatening or challenging. Social Psychology of Education, 17, 229–248. doi:10.1007/s11218-014-9249-710.1007/s11218-014-9249-7
  • Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44, 159–175. doi:10.1080/0046152090302899010.1080/00461520903028990
  • Remedios, R., & Putwain, D. W. (2013). Under pressure: The relation between teacher fear appeals and student motivation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Abstract Retrieved from http://convention2.allacademic.com/one/aera/aera13/index.php?click_key=1&cmd=Multi+Search+Search+Load+Publication&publication_id=606385&PHPSESSID=8uv45ugpttkgneuu3jhi2mteq5
  • Roberts, K. (2004). School-to-work transitions: Why the United Kingdom’s educational ladders always fail to connect. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 14, 203–216. doi:10.1080/0962021040020012610.1080/09620210400200126
  • Ruiter, R. A. D., Abraham, C., & Kok, G. (2001). Scary warnings and rational precautions: A review of the psychology of fear appeals. Psychology and Health, 16, 613–630. doi:10.1080/08870440108405863
  • Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (2008). Psychological threat and extrinsic goal striving. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 37–45. doi:10.1007/s11031-008-9081-510.1007/s11031-008-9081-5
  • Schutz, P. A., Benson, J., & Decuir-Gunby, J. T. (2008). Approach/avoidance motives, test emotions, and emotional regulation related to testing. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 21, 263–281. doi:10.1080/1061580070178767210.1080/10615800701787672
  • Smerecnik, C. M. R., & Ruiter, R. A. C. (2010). Fear appeals in HIV prevention: The role of anticipated regret. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 15, 550–559. doi:10.1080/13548506.2010.49
  • Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis. London: Sage.
  • Sprinkle, R., Hunt, S., Simonds, C., & Comadena, M. (2006). Fear in the classroom: An examination of teachers' use of fear appeals and students learning outcomes. Communication Education, 55, 389–402. doi:10.1080/03634520600879170
  • Upadyaya, K., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2013). Development of school engagement in association with academic success and well-being in varying social contexts. European Psychologist, 18, 136–147. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a00014310.1027/1016-9040/a000143
  • Wentzel, K. (2012). Socio-cultural contexts, social competence and engagement at school. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 479–488). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2310.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
  • Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Expectancy-value theory: Retrospective and prospective. In T. C. Urdan & S. A. Karabenick (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement, Volume 16: The decade ahead: Theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement (pp. 35–70). Bingley: Emerald Group. doi:10.1108/S0749-7423(2010)000016A00510.1108/S0749-7423(2010)000016A005
  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.101510.1006/ceps.1999.1015
  • Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior, 27, 591–615. doi:10.1177/109019810002700506
  • Woolfolk Hoy, A., Hoy, W. K., & Davis, H. A. (2009). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation in school (pp. 627–653). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., & Hooymayers, H. P. (1992). Do teacher ideals distort the self-reports of their interpersonal behavior? Teaching and Teacher Education, 8, 47–58. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(92)90039-610.1016/0742-051X(92)90039-6

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.