Which feedback is more effective for pursuing multiple goals of differing importance? The interaction effects of goal importance and performance feedback type on self-regulation and task achievement

References

• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586–598.10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann, N., & Kuhl, J. (2002). Intuition, affect, and personality: Unconscious coherence judgments and self-regulation of negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1213–1223.10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 155–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M., de Koning, E., & Vedder, P. (2006). Goal-directed behavior and contextual factors in the classroom: An innovative approach to the study of multiple goals. Educational Psychologist, 41, 33–51.10.1207/s15326985ep4101_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodscholl, J. C., Kober, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2007). Strategies of self-regulation in goal attainment versus goal maintenance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 628–648.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19–35.10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascallar, E., Boekaerts, M., & Costigan, T. (2006). Assessment in the evaluation of self-regulation as a process. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 297–306.10.1007/s10648-006-9023-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, W., & Tesser, A. (1996). The ‘what the hell’ effect: Some effects of goal proximity and goal framing on performance. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect, and self-regulation (pp. 99–120). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dunegan, K. J. (1993). Framing, cognitive modes, and image theory: Toward an understanding of a glass half full. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 491–503.10.1037/0021-9010.78.3.491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189.10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232.10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmons, R. A., & Diener, E. (1986). A goal-affect analysis of everyday situational choices. Journal of Research in Personality, 20, 309–326.10.1016/0092-6566(86)90137-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eshel, Y., & Kohavi, R. (2003). Perceived classroom control, self-regulated learning strategies, and academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 23, 249–260.10.1080/0144341032000060093
   Google Scholar
• Fishbach, A., Zhang, Y., & Koo, M. (2009). The dynamics of self-regulation. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 315–344.10.1080/10463280903275375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzsimons, G. M., & Fishbach, A. (2010). Shifting closeness: Interpersonal effects of personal goal progress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 535–549. doi:10.1037/a001858110.1037/a0018581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Förster, J., Higgins, E. T., & Idson, L. C. (1998). Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment: Regulatory focus and the ‘goal looms larger’ effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1115–1131. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.75.5.111510.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Förster, J., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). Accessibility from active and fulfilled goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 220–239.10.1016/j.jesp.2004.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas, A. L., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2002). Regulatory fit and resisting temptation during goal pursuit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 291–298.10.1006/jesp.2001.1504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer, P. M. (1993). Goal achievement: The role of intentions. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 141–185). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, L. R., Markman, A. B., Todd Maddox, W., & Baldwin, G. C. (2008). Differential effects of regulatory fit on category learning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 920–927.10.1016/j.jesp.2007.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340.10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T., Roney, C. J., Crowe, E., & Hymes, C. (1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance distinct self-regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 276–286.10.1037/0022-3514.66.2.276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T., Van Hook, E., & Dorfman, D. (1988). Do self attributes form a cognitive structure? Social Cognition, 6, 177–206.10.1521/soco.1988.6.3.177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck, J. R., & Williams, C. R. (1987). Goal importance, self-focus, and the goal-setting process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 204–211.10.1037/0021-9010.72.2.204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgen, D., & Davis, C. (2000). Bearing bad news: Reactions to negative performance feedback. Applied Psychology, 49, 550–565.10.1111/apps.2000.49.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, S. J. (2008). The effect of framing on motivation ( Unpublished Master’s thesis). Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Koo, M., & Fishbach, A. (2008). Dynamics of self-regulation: How (un)accomplished goal actions affect motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 183–195.10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, M., & Fishbach, A. (2010). Climbing the goal ladder: How upcoming actions increase level of aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 1–13.10.1037/a0019443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, M., & Fishbach, A. (2012). The small-area hypothesis: Effects of progress monitoring on goal adherence. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 493–509.10.1086/663827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. W., Thompson, E. P., Higgins, E. T., Atash, M., Pierro, A., Shah, J. Y., & Spiegel, S. (2000). To ‘do the right thing’ or to ‘just do it’: Locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 793–815.10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhl, J. (1984). Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action-control. In B. A. Maher & W. B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 13, pp. 99–171). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, G. P., Erez, M., & Locke, E. A. (1988). Resolving scientific disputes by the joint design of crucial experiments by the antagonists: Application to the Erez-Latham dispute regarding participation in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 753–772.10.1037/0021-9010.73.4.753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. (2012). Effects of goal relations on self-regulated learning in multiple goal pursuits: Performance, the self-regulatory process, and task enjoyment. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13, 369–386.10.1007/s12564-012-9216-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. (2013). The interaction effects between goal importance, performance feedback, achievement goal orientations on self-regulation: Colleges students’ studying time. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 27, 783–807.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1936). The psychology of success and failure. Occupations, 14, 926–930.
   Google Scholar
• Louro, M. J., Pieters, R., & Zeelenberg, M. (2007). Dynamics of multiple-goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 174–193.10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. L., & Tesser, A. (1989). Toward a motivational and structural theory of ruminative thought. In J. S. Uleman & J. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 306–326). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFarland, C., & Miller, D. T. (1994). The framing of relative performance feedback: Seeing the glass as half empty or half full. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1061–1073.10.1037/0022-3514.66.6.1061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlin, D. B., & Blascovich, J. (1981). Effects of self-esteem and performance feedback on future affective preferences and cognitive expectations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 521–531.10.1037/0022-3514.40.3.521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, N. E. (1944). Experimental studies of conflict. Personality and the Behavior Disorders, 1, 431–465.
   Google Scholar
• Muraven, M., Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Self-control as a limited resource: Regulatory depletion patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 774–789.10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407.10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salovey, P., & Williams-Piehota, P. (2004). Field experiments in social psychology message framing and the promotion of health protective behaviors. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 488–505.10.1177/0002764203259293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutz, P. A., & Davis, H. A. (2000). Emotions and self-regulation during test taking. Educational Psychologist, 35, 243–256.10.1207/S15326985EP3504_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seijts, G. H., & Latham, G. P. (2001). The effect of distal learning, outcome, and proximal goals on a moderately complex task. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 291–307.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, J., Higgins, E. T., & Friedman, R. S. (1998). Performance incentives and means: How regulatory focus influences goal attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 285–293.10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, J. Y. (2005). The automatic pursuit and management of goals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 10–13.10.1111/cdir.2005.14.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, J. Y., Friedman, R., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2002). Forgetting all else: On the antecedents and consequences of goal shielding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1261–1280.10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, J. Y., Kruglanski, A. W., & Friedman, R. (2003). Goal systems theory: Integrating the cognitive and motivational aspects of self-regulation. Motivated Social Perception: Ontarion Symposium, 9, 247–275.
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189.10.3102/0034654307313795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sideridis, G. D. (2001). The causal role of goal importance for the explanation of student study behaviour: Cross-validation with multiple samples. Educational Psychology, 21, 277–298.10.1080/01443410120065487
   Google Scholar
• Stipek, D. J. (2002). Motivation to learn: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, R. A. (1991). Emotional regulation and emotional development. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 269–307.10.1007/BF01319934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.10.1126/science.7455683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039–1061.10.2307/2937956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vancouver, J. B., & Schmitt, N. W. (1991). An exploratory examination of person-organization fit: Organizational goal congruence. Personnel Psychology, 44, 333–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H., Jamieson-Noel, D., & Muis, K. (2002). Methodological issues and advances in researching tactics, strategies, and self-regulated learning. In P. Pintrich & M. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: New directions in measures and methods (Vol. 12, pp. 121–156). Amsterdam: JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H., Nesbit, J., Kumar, V. K., Hadwin, A. F., Lajoie, S. P., Azevedo, R., & Perry, N. (2006). Supporting self-regulated learning with gStudy software: The learning kit project. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and learning, 3, 105–113.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Fishbach, A., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2007). The dilution model: How additional goals undermine the perceived instrumentality of a shared path. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 389–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeigarnik, B. (1927). Über das Behalten von erledigten und unerledigten Handlungen [On the memory for finished and unfinished tasks]. Psychologische Forschung, 9, 1–85.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51–59.10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar