Publication Cover
Educational Psychology
An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology
Volume 36, 2016 - Issue 2
973
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The relationship between research self-efficacy, research disposition and publication output

&
Pages 347-361 | Received 20 Oct 2013, Accepted 26 Feb 2015, Published online: 24 Mar 2015

References

  • Adams, K. (2004). Modelling success: Enhancing international postgraduate research students’ self-efficacy for research seminar presentations. Higher Education Research & Development, 23, 115–129. doi:10.1080/0729436042000206618
  • Åkerlind, G. S. (2008). An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: An integration of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 17–31. doi:10.1080/03075070701794775
  • Åkerlind, G. S. (2010). Academic work: A developmental perspective. In R. H. Cantwell & J. J. Scevak (Eds.), An academic life (pp. 182–191). Camberwell, Vic.: ACER Press.
  • Al-Issa, A. S., & Al-Bulushi, A. (2011). Mere indolence or genuine hindrance: Paucity of publishing in ELT at Sultan Qaboos University. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 6, 2–12. Retrieved from http://www.world-education-center.org/index.php/cjes/article/view/206/pdf_33
  • Allison, P. D., & Stewart, J. A. (1974). Productivity differences among scientists: Evidence for accumulative advantage. American Sociological Review, 39, 596–606.10.2307/2094424
  • Austin, A. E., & Gamson, Z. F. (1983). Academic workplace: New demands, heightened tensions. ( ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Research Report No. 10). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 243 397).
  • Australian Academy of Sciences. (2008). Review of Australian higher education discussion paper. Canberra: Australian Academy of Sciences.
  • Australian Government. (2012). The excellence in research for Australia (ERA). Retrieved from http://www.arc.gov.au/era/
  • Bailey, J. G. (1999). Academics’ motivation and self-efficacy for teaching and research. Higher Education Research & Development, 18, 343–359. doi:10.1080/0729436990180305
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentive perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. Retrieved from http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.110.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
  • Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining early career in research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023%2FA%3A1022698529612.pdf10.1023/A:1022698529612
  • Behymer, C. A. (1974). Institutional and personal correlates of faculty productivity ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
  • Bentley, P. J., & Kyvik, S. (2012). Academic work from a comparative perspective: A survey of faculty working time across 13 countries. Higher Education, 63, 529–547. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9457-4
  • Billot, J. (2011). The changing research context: Implications for leadership. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33, 37–46. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2011.537010
  • Blackburn, R. T., & Lawrence, J. H. (1995). Faculty at work: Motivation, expectation, satisfaction. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Bland, C. J., Center, B. A., Finstad, D. A., Risbey, K. R., & Staples, J. G. (2005). A theoretical, practical, predictive model of faculty and department research productivity. Academic Medicine, 80, 225–237. Retrieved from http://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/Fulltext/2005/03000/The_Research_Productivity_of_Faculty_in_Family.8.aspx10.1097/00001888-200503000-00006
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London: Routledge.
  • Ernst, & Young, Australia. (2012). University of the future: A thousand year old industry on the cusp of profound change. Retrieved from http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/University_of_the_future/$FILE/University_of_the_future_2012.pdf
  • Evans, L. (2012). Leadership for researcher development: What research leaders need to know and understand. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 40, 423–435. doi:10.1177/1741143212438218
  • Fairweather, J. S. (2006). The mythologies of faculty productivity: Implications for institutional policy and decision making. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 26–48. doi:10.1353/jhe.2002.0006
  • Fan, A. (1997). The relationship of self-efficacy and perceptions of work environment to the research productivity of faculty in selected universities across Taiwan ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Mississippi State University, Starkville.
  • Finnegan, D. E., & Hyle, A. E. (2009). Assistant to ‘full’ rank: Rank and development of expertise. Teachers College Record, 111, 443–479.
  • Forester, M., Kahn, J. H., & Hesson-McInnis, M. S. (2004). Factor structures of three measures of research self-efficacy. Journal of Career Assessment, 12, 3–16. doi:10.1177/1069072703257719
  • Gelso, C. J., Raphael, R., Black, S. M., Rardin, D., & Skalkos, O. (1983). Research training in counselling psychology: Some preliminary data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30, 611–614.10.1037/0022-0167.30.4.611
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Walker, B. (2010). Academic life: An interpersonal dimension. In R. H. Cantwell & J. J. Scevak (Eds.), An academic life (pp. 160–172). Camberwell, Vic.: ACER Press.
  • Hardy, I., Heimans, S., & Lingard, B. (2011). Journal rankings: Positioning the field of educational research and educational academics. Power and Education, 3, 5–17.10.2304/power
  • Hartley, J., & Branthwaite, A. (1989). The psychologist as wordsmith: A questionnaire study of the writing strategies of productive British psychologists. Higher Education, 18, 423–452. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2FBF00140748.pdf10.1007/BF00140748
  • Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 507–542. doi:10.3102/00346543066004507
  • Hemmings, B., & Hill, D. (2013, June). A study of two higher education institutions seeking university status: A cultural shift. Paper delivered at the Clute Institute International Academic Conference, Paris. Retrieved from http://www.cluteinstitute.com/proceedings/2013PFPapers/Article%20382.pdf
  • Hemmings, B., & Kay, R. (2009). Lecturer self-efficacy: Its related dimensions and the influence of gender and qualifications. Issues in Educational Research, 19, 243–254. Retrieved from http://www.iier.org.au/iier19/hemmings3.pdf
  • Hemmings, B., & Kay, R. (2010a). Research self-efficacy, publication output, and early career development. International Journal of Educational Management, 24, 562–574. doi:10.1108/09513541011079978
  • Hemmings, B., & Kay, R. (2010b). University lecturer publication output: Qualifications, time and confidence count. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32, 185–197. doi:10.1080/13600800903575520
  • Hemmings, B., Kay, R., Sharp, J., & Taylor, C. (2012). A trans-national comparison of lecturer self-efficacy. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 36, 291–307. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2011.614932
  • Hemmings, B. C., Rushbrook, P., & Smith, E. (2007). Academics’ views on publishing refereed works: A content analysis. Higher Education, 54, 307–332. doi:10.1007/s10734-005-8608-x
  • Hughes, M., & Bennett, D. (2013). Survival skills: The impact of change and the ERA on Australian researchers. Higher Education Research & Development, 32, 340–354. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.684211
  • Im, J., & Hartman, S. (1997). The role of research in MIS Faculty performance evaluation: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 37, 37–40.
  • Ito, J. K., & Brotheridge, C. M. (2007). Predicting individual research productivity: More than a question of time. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 37(1), 1–25. Retrieved from http://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/cjhe/article/view/183544/183489
  • Jang, D., & Shin, I. (2011). The relationship between research self-efficacy and other research constructs: Synthesizing evidence and developing policy implications through meta-analysis. KJEP, 8, 279–301. Retrieved from http://eng.kedi.re.kr/khome/eng/kjep/pubView.do
  • Kyvik, S. (2013). The academic researcher role: Enhancing expectations and improved performance. Higher Education, 65, 525–538. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9561-0
  • Lambie, G. W., Hayes, B. G., Griffith, C., Limberg, D., & Mullen, P. R. (2014). An exploratory investigation of the research self-efficacy, interest in research, and research knowledge of Ph.D in education students. Innovative Higher Education, 39, 139–153. doi:10.1007/s10755-013-9264-1
  • Laudel, G., & Gläser, J. (2008). From apprentice to colleague: The metamorphosis of early career researchers. Higher Education, 55, 387–406. doi:10.1007/s10734-007-9063-7
  • Leisyte, L., Enders, J., & de Boer, H. (2009). The balance between teaching and research in Dutch and English universities in the context of university governance reforms. Higher Education, 58, 619–635. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9213-1
  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2006). Social cognitive career theory. In D. Brown & Associates (Eds.), Career choice and development (4th ed., pp. 255–311). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Lertputtarak, S. (2008). An investigation of factors related to research productivity in a public university in Thailand: A case study ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Victoria University, Melbourne.
  • McGrail, M. R., Rickard, C. M., & Jones, R. (2006). Publish or perish: A systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. Higher Education Research & Development, 25, 19–35. doi:10.1080/07294360500453053
  • Oshagbemi, T. (2000). How satisfied are academics with their primary tasks of teaching, research and administration and management? International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 1, 124–136. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=1467-6370&volume=1&issue=210.1108/1467630010371876
  • Quimbo, T. M., & Sulabo, E. C. (2014). Research productivity and its implications in higher education institutions. Studies in Higher Education, 39, 1955–1971. doi.10.1080/03075079.2013.818639
  • Seyyed, F. J., Al-Haji Umar, Y., & Al-Hajji, M. (2004). Determinants of business faculty research productivity in the Middle East. In G. Ogunmokun, R. Gabbay, & J. McPhail (Eds.), The challenges of inter-disciplinary perspectives and globalization in the 21st century. Proceedings of the Inaugural Academy of World Business, Marketing and Management Development Conference (pp. 1108–1123), Gold Coast, Australia.
  • Sharp, J. G., Hemmings, B., Kay, R., & Callinan, C. (2012). An application of the revised ‘Lecturer Self-efficacy Questionnaire’: An evidence-based route for transformational change. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 37, 643–674. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2011.645596
  • Sikes, P. (2006). Working in a ‘new’ university: In the shadow of the research assessment exercise. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 555–568. doi:10.1080/03075070600922758
  • Stack, S. (2004). Gender, children and research productivity. Research in Higher Education, 45, 891–920. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11162-004-5953-z.pdf10.1007/s11162-004-5953-z
  • Startup, R., & Gruneberg, M. M. (1976). The rewards of research. Higher Education Quarterly, 30, 227–238. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2273.1976.tb01934.x/pdf10.1111/hequ.1976.30.issue-2
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Talib, A. A. (2002). The research assessment exercise and motivation: A note on the difference in the impact on the active researchers and the non-active. Higher Education Review, 34, 51–59.
  • Tien, F. F. (2000). To what degree does the desire for promotion motivate faculty to perform research? Testing the expectancy theory. Research in Higher Education, 41, 723–752. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023%2FA%3A1007020721531.pdf10.1023/A:1007020721531
  • Van der Rijst, R. M., Van Driel, J. H., Kijne, J. W., & Verloop, N. (2007, August). Scientific research dispositions in research, teaching and learning. In J. H. Van Driel (chair), University teachers’ conceptions of relations between teaching and disciplinary research. Symposium conducted at the biennial meeting of the European Association of Research in Learning and Instruction, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Webber, K. L. (2012). Research productivity of foreign- and US-born faculty: Differences by time on task. Higher Education, 64, 709–729. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9523-6
  • Zhao, J., McCormick, J., & Hoekman, K. (2008). Ideocentrism-allocentrism and academics’ self-efficacy for research in Beijing universities. International Journal of Educational Management, 22, 168–183. doi:10.1108/09513540810853567
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82–91.10.1006/ceps.1999.1016

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.