Predictors for Chinese students’ management of study environment in online groupwork

References

• Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 12, 1–6.10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard-Brak, L., Lan, W. Y., & Paton, V. O. (2010). Profiles in self-regulated learning in the online learning environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11, 61–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard-Brak, L., Paton, V. O., & Lan, W. Y. (2010). Self-regulation across time of first-generation online learners. Research in Learning Technology, 18, 61–70.10.1080/09687761003657572
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, E., & Lally, V. (1999). Gender differences in an on-line learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15, 48–60.10.1046/j.1365-2729.1999.151075.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigenho, C. W. (2011). Student reflections as artifacts of self-regulatory behaviors for learning: A tale of two courses ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of North Texas, Denton, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M., & Cascallar, E. (2006). How far have we moved toward the integration of theory and practice in self-regulation? Educational Psychology Review, 18, 199–210.10.1007/s10648-006-9013-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broos, A. (2005). Gender and information and communication technologies (ICT) anxiety: Male self-assurance and female hesitation. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8, 21–31. doi:10.1089/cpb.2005.8.21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, L., Chen, H., & Wang, N. (2009). Distance education in china: The current state of e-learning. Campus – Wide Information Systems, 26, 82–89. doi:10.1108/10650740910946792
   Google Scholar
• Chiong, R., & Jovanovic, J. (2012). Collaborative learning in online study group: An evolutionary game theory perspective. Journal of Information Technology Education, 11, 81–101.
   Google Scholar
• Corno, L. (2001). Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 191–225). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (2004). What we have learned about student engagement in the past twenty years. In D. M. McInerney & S. V. Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited: Vol 4. Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (pp. 299–328). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz, D. P., & Cartnal, R. B. (1999). Students’ learning styles in two classes: Online distance learning and equivalent on-campus. College Teaching, 47, 130–135.10.1080/87567559909595802
   Google Scholar
• Dirkx, J. M., & Smith, R. O. (2004). Thinking out of a bowl of spaghetti: Learning to learn in online collaborative groups. In T. Roberts (Ed.), Online collaborative learning: Theory and practice (pp. 132–159). Hershey, PA: IDEA Group Publishing.10.4018/978-1-59140-174-2
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40, 117–128.10.1207/s15326985ep4002_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L., & Wallace, M. (2004). Australian academics teaching in Singapore: Striving for cultural empathy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41, 291–304.10.1080/14703290410001733285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, X., & Thompson, B. (2001). Confidence intervals about score reliability coefficients, please: An EPM guidelines editorial. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 517–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, J., & Freeman, L. A. (2010). Are men more technology-oriented than women? The role of gender on the development of general computer self-efficacy of college students. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21, 203–212.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, M. H., & Hill, J. R. (2009). Student perceptions of group work in an online course: Benefits and challenges. Journal of Distance Education, 23, 69–91.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhl, J. (1985). Volitional mediators of cognition-behavior consistency: Self-regulatory processes and action versus state orientation. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 101–128). New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3
   Google Scholar
• Kuhl, J. (1987). Action control: The maintenance of motivational states. In F.K. Halisch & J. Kuhl (Eds.), Motivation, intention, and volition (pp. 279–291). Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-70967-8
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlen, R., & Michels, D. (2006). Collaborative e-learning – An opportunity to identify and to overcome gender barriers. In T. Reeves & S. Yamashita (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2006 (pp. 2593–2601). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, I. (2002). Gender differences in self-regulated on-line learning strategies within Korea’s university context. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 50, 101–111.10.1007/BF02504967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. Y., & Brand, J. L. (2005). Effects of control over office workspace on perceptions of the work environment and work outcomes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 323–333.10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q. (2006). Computer-mediated communication: A meta-analysis of male and female attitudes and behaviors. International Journal on E-Learning, 5, 525–570.
   Google Scholar
• Li, B. (2009). The use of e-learning in pre-service teacher education. Campus – Wide Information Systems, 26, 132–136. doi:10.1108/10650740910946855
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Lin, F., & Wang, X. (2003). Education practice and analysing behaviour of students in a web-based learning environment: An exploratory study from China. Online Information Review, 27, 110–119.10.1108/14684520310471725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaslin, M., & Hickey, D. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A Vygotskian view. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 227–252). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Piezon, S. L., & Ferree, W. D. (2008). Perceptions of social loafing in online learning groups: A study of public university and U.S. naval war college students. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic.10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407.10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MLSQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813.10.1177/0013164493053003024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of Achievement Motivation (pp. 249–284). San Diego, CA: Academic.10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50012-7
   Google Scholar
• Pokay, P., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (1990). Predicting achievement early and late in the semester: The role of motivation and use of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 41–50.10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, L. L. (2006). Gender differences and similarities in online courses: Challenging stereotypical views of women. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 349–359.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00181.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rogat, T. K., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2011). Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: An analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group processes. Cognition and Instruction, 29, 375–415.10.1080/07370008.2011.607930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (2005). Self-regulated learning: The educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40, 85–94.10.1207/s15326985ep4002_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., Dick, G., Chin, W. W., & Land, L. (2007). Self-regulation and e-learning. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth European Conference on Information System (pp. 383–394). St. Gallen: University of St. Gallen. Retrieved December 28, 2012 from http://is2.lse.ac.uk/asp/aspecis/20070157.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. G., Sorensen, C., Gump, A., Heindel, A. J., Caris, M., & Martinez, C. D. (2011). Overcoming student resistance to group work: Online versus face-to-face. The Internet and Higher Education, 14, 121–128.10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trautwein, U., Köller, O., Schmitz, B., & Baumert, J. (2002). Do homework assignments enhance achievement? A multilevel analysis in 7th-grade mathematics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 26–50.10.1006/ceps.2001.1084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutty, J. L., & Klein, J. D. (2008). Computer-mediated instruction: A comparison of online and face-to-face collaboration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 101–124.10.1007/s11423-007-9050-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whipp, J. L., & Chiarelli, S. (2004). Self-regulation in a web-based course: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52, 5–21.10.1007/BF02504714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, J., Cotton, D., Gavin, J., & Yorke, J. D. (2010). Effective e-learning? Multi-tasking, distractions and boundary management by graduate students in an online environment. Research in Learning Technology, 18, 71–83.10.1080/09687761003657598
   Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 189–205.10.1207/S15326985EP3804_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. (2011). Regulation of motivation: Contextual and social aspects. Teachers College Record, 113, 265–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J. (2007). Middle school homework management: More than just gender and family involvement. Educational Psychology, 27, 173–189.10.1080/01443410601066669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J. (2008). Models of secondary school students' interest in homework: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 1180–1205.10.3102/0002831208323276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J. (2010). Homework purpose scale for high school students: A validation study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 459–476.10.1177/0013164409344517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J. (2011). Homework purpose scale for middle school students: A validation study. Middle Grades Research Journal, 6(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, J. (2012). Predicting students’ homework environment management at the secondary school level. Educational Psychology, 32, 183–200.10.1080/01443410.2011.635639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2007). Predictors for student success in an outline course. Educational Technology and Society, 10, 71–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2009). Gender differences in self-regulated online learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12, 12–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, J., McConnell, D., & Jiang, Y. (2009). Teachers’ conceptions of e-learning in Chinese higher education: A phenomenographic analysis. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 26, 90–97.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, C., Valcke, M., & Schellens, T. (2009). A cross-cultural study of online collaborative learning. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 3, 33–46. doi:10.1108/17504970910951138
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 307–313.10.1016/0361-476X(86)90027-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166–183.10.3102/0002831207312909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51–59.10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614–628.10.3102/00028312023004614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar