Personality and problem behaviours as predictors of adolescents’ social status: academic track and gender as moderators

References

• Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Integrative guide to the 1991 CBCL/4-18, YSR, and TRF profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1998). Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, P. A., Kless, S. J., & Adler, P. (1992). Socialization to gender roles: Popularity among elementary school boys and girls. Sociology of Education, 65, 169–187. doi:10.2307/2112807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balsa, A. I., Homer, J. F., French, M. T., & Norton, E. C. (2011). Alcohol use and popularity: Social payoffs from conforming to peers' behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 559–568. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00704.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, B. E., & Luthar, S. S. (2007). Peer-perceived admiration and social preference: Contextual correlates of positive peer regard among suburban and urban adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 117–144. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2007.00514.x10.1111/jora.2007.17.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellmore, A. D., Villarreal, V. M., & Ho, A. Y. (2011). Staying cool across the first year of middle school. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 776–785. doi:10.1007/s10964-010-9590-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt, T. J. (1982). The features and effects of friendship in early adolescence. Child Development, 53, 1447–1460. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1982.tb03466.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronneman-Helmers, H. M., Herweijer, L. J., & Vogels, H. M. G. (2002). Voortgezet Onderwijs in de Jaren Negentig [Secondary education in the nineties]. The Hague: The Netherlands Institute for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Bukowski, W. M., Motzoi, C., & Meyer, F. (2009). Friendship as process, function and outcome. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 240–242). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, L. (2004). The role of classroom norms in contextualizing the relations of children's social behaviors to peer acceptance. Developmental Psychology, 40, 691–702. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciarrochi, J., & Heaven, P. C. L. (2009). A longitudinal study into the link between adolescent personality and peer-rated likeability and adjustment: Evidence of gender differences. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 978–986. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cillessen, A. H. N., & Marks, P. E. L. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring popularity. In A. H. N. Cillessen, D. Schwartz, & L. Mayeux (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 27–28). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147–163. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cillessen, A. H. N., & Rose, A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 102–105. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cillessen, A. H. N., Schwartz, D., & Mayeux, L. (2011). Popularity in the peer system. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Closson, L. M. (2009). Status and gender differences in early adolescents' descriptions of popularity. Social Development, 18, 412–426. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00459.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–570. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.18.4.557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrod, P. J., Stewart, S. H., Comeau, N., & Maclean, A. M. (2006). Efficacy of cognitive-behavioral interventions targeting personality risk factors for youth alcohol misuse. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 35, 550–563. doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp3504_6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Amico, E. J., Tucker, J. S., Miles, J. N. V., Zhou, A. J., Shih, R. A., & Green, H. D. (2012). Preventing alcohol use with a voluntary after-school program for middle school students: Results from a cluster randomized controlled trial of CHOICE. Prevention Science, 13, 415–425. doi:10.1007/s11121-011-0269-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dronkers, J. (1997). Loopbanen door het Voorgezet Onderwijs in de jaren negentig [Careers in secondary education in the nineties]. Beleid en Maatschappij, 24, 85–95.
   Google Scholar
• Dutch Ministry of Education. (2014). Description of the Educational System. Retrieved July, 2014, from http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/voortgezet-onderwijs
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., Lord, S., & Midgley, C. (1991). What are we doing to early adolescents? The impact of educational contexts on early adolescents. American Journal of Education, 99, 521–542.10.1086/aje.1991.99.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Mac Iver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents' experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48, 90–101. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geijsel, F., Ledoux, G., Reumerman, R., & Ten Dam, G. (2012). Citizenship in young people’s daily lives: Differences in citizenship competences of adolescents in the Netherlands. Journal of Youth Studies, 15(6), 1–19. doi:10.1080/13676261.2012.671932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality-traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26–34. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.48.1.26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman, A. H., Kim, J., & Schimmelbusch, A. (2002). The attributes adolescents associate with peer popularity and teacher preference. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 143–165. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(02)00092-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamm, J. V., Hoffman, A., & Farmer, T. W. (2012). Peer cultures of academic effort and achievement in adolescence: Why they matter, and what teachers can do about them. In A. M. Ryan & G. W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships and adjustment at school (pp. 219–251). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Adams, R., Perry, D. G., Workman, K. A., Furdella, J. Q., & Egan, S. K. (2002). Agreeableness, extraversion, and peer relations in early adolescence: Winning friends and deflecting aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 224–251. doi:10.1006/jrpe.2002.2348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonkmann, K., Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2009). Social dominance in adolescence: The moderating role of the classroom context and behavioral heterogeneity. Child Development, 80, 338–355. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01264.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice in structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Košir, K., & Pečjak, S. (2005). Sociometry as a method for investigating peer relationships: What does it actually measure? Educational Research, 47, 127–144. doi:10.1080/0013188042000337604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2002). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38, 635–647. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.38.5.635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lease, A. M., Kennedy, C. A., & Axelrod, J. L. (2002). Children's social constructions of popularity. Social Development, 11, 87–109. doi:10.1111/14679507.00188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubbers, M. J., van der Werf, M. P. C., Kuyper, H., & Offringa, G. J. (2006). Predicting peer acceptance in Dutch youth: A multilevel analysis. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 26, 4–35. doi:10.1177/0272431605282747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayeux, L., Sandstrom, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2008). Is being popular a risky proposition? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18, 49–74. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2008.00550.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijs, N., Cillessen, A. H. N., Scholte, R. H. J., Segers, E., & Spijkerman, R. (2007). Social intelligence and academic achievement as predictors of adolescent popularity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 62–72. doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9373-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meisinger, E. B., Blake, J. J., Lease, A. M., Palardy, G. J., & Olejnik, S. F. (2007). Variant and invariant predictors of perceived popularity across majority-Black and majority-White classrooms. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 21–44. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). M-plus (Version 6) [Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Newcomb, A. F., Bukowski, W. M., & Pattee, L. (1993). Children’s peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99–128. doi:10.1037//00332909.113.1.99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldenburg, C. M., & Kems, K. A. (1997). Associations between peer relationships and depressive symptoms: Testing moderator effects of gender and age. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 17, 319–337. doi:10.1177/0272431697017003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. G. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 125–144. doi:10.1177/0272431698018002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rambaran, A. J., Dijkstra, J. K., & Stark, T. H. (2013). Status-based influence processes: The role of norm salience in contagion of adolescent risk attitudes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 574–585. doi:10.1111/jora.12032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandstrom, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2006). Likeable versus popular: Distinct implications for adolescent adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 304–314. doi:10.1177/0165025406072789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78, 509–538. doi:10.1111/j.1467%2D6494.2010.00625.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stormshak, E. A., Bierman, K. L., Bruschi, C., Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. D., & the Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1999). The relation between behavior problems and peer preference in different classroom contexts. Child Development, 70, 169–182. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sussman, S., Sun, P., Rohrbach, L. A., & Spruijt-Metz, D. (2012). One-year outcomes of a drug abuse prevention program for older teens and emerging adults: Evaluating a motivational interviewing booster component. Health Psychology, 31, 476–485. doi:10.1037/a0025756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Dam, G., & Vermunt, J. (2009). De Leerling [The student]. In N. Verloop & J. Lowyck (Eds.), Onderwijskunde [Educational science] (pp. 151–194). Groningen: Noordhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Teunissen, H. A., Adelman, C. B., Prinstein, M. J., Spijkerman, R., Poelen, E. A. P., Engels, R. C. M. E., & Scholte, R. H. J. (2011). The interaction between pubertal timing and peer popularity for boys and girls: An integration of biological and interpersonal perspectives on adolescent depression. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39, 413–423. doi:10.1007/s10802-010-9467-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torney-Purta, J., & Barber, C. (2004). Democratic school participation and civic attitudes among European adolescents. Analyses of data from the IEA civic education study. Strasbourg: European Council.
   Google Scholar
• van der Linden, D., Scholte, R. H. J., Cillessen, A. H. N., te Nijenhuis, J., & Segers, E. (2010). Classroom ratings of likeability and popularity are related to the Big Five and the general factor of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 669–672. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermulst, A. A., & Gerris, J. R. M. (2005). Quick Big Five personality test manual. Leeuwarden: LCD.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. C., Giammarino, M., & Parad, H. (1986). Social status in small groups: Individual group similarity and the social “misfit.”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 523–536.10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, H., Li, Y., Boucher, S. M., Hutchins, B. C., & Cairns, B. D. (2006). What makes a girl (or a boy) popular (or unpopular). African American children’s perceptions and developmental differences. Developmental Psychology, 42, 599–612. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.4.59910.1037/0012-1649.42.4.599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar