Exploring effects of background context familiarity and signaling on comprehension, recall, and cognitive load

References

• Anderson, R. C. (1978). Schema-directed processes in language comprehension. In A. M. Lesgold, J. W. Pellegrino, S. D. Fokkema, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Cognitive psychology and instruction (pp. 67–82). New York, NY: Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4684-2535-2
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C. (1994). Role of the reader’s schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 469–482). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255–291). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L., & Goetz, E. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 14, 367–381.10.3102/00028312014004367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., Wang, Q., & Gaffney, J. S. (2006). Comprehension research over the three decades. In A. K. D. Stahl & M. C. McKenna (Eds.), Reading research at work; Foundations of effective practice (pp. 275–283). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, P. (2006). Using subjective measures to detect variations of intrinsic cognitive load within problems. Learning and Instruction, 16, 389–400.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. C. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717–726.10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80006-9
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, L. W., Dansereau, D. F., Spurlin, J. E., & Holley, C. D. (1983). Effects of headings on text processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 292–302.10.1037/0022-0663.75.2.292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruning, R., Schraw, G., & Norby, M. (2011). Cognitive psychology and instruction (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Brünken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2003). Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 53–61.10.1207/S15326985EP3801_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brünken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2004). Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning with dual-task methodology: Auditory load and modality effects. Instructional Science, 32, 115–132.10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021812.96911.c5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, R. F., Harste, J. C., & Smith, S. L. (1981). Contextual constraints and discourse processes: A replication study. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 201–212.10.2307/747555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293–332.10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1996). Cognitive load while learning to use a computer program. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 151–170.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98–104.10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, C. P. (2011). The evaluation of argument mapping as a learning tool ( Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://aran.library.nuigalway.ie
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2013). An examination of the effects of argument mapping on students’ memory and comprehension performance. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 11–24.10.1016/j.tsc.2012.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freebody, P., & Anderson, R. C. (1983). Effects of vocabulary difficulty, text cohesion, and schema availability on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 277–294.10.2307/747389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. C. (2001). Psychological statistics using SPSS for windows. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gimino, A. (2002). Students’ investment of mental effort. In Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Green, S. B., Lissitz, R. W., & Mulaik, S. A. (1977). Limitations of coefficient alpha as an index of test unidimensionality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 827–838.10.1177/001316447703700403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, P. (2008). Designing and reporting experiments in psychology. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hasler, B. S., Kersten, B., & Sweller, J. (2007). Learner control, cognitive load and instructional animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 713–729.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151.10.1177/001316446002000116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38, 23–31.10.1207/S15326985EP3801_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1998). Levels of expertise and instructional design. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 40, 1–17.10.1518/001872098779480587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 351–371.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2004). Measuring knowledge to optimize cognitive load factors during instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 558–568.10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Larkin, K. C. (1984). Relation of self-efficacy expectations to academic achievement and persistence. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 356–362.10.1037/0022-0167.31.3.356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loman, N. L., & Mayer, R. E. (1983). Signaling techniques that increase the understandability of expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 402–412.10.1037/0022-0663.75.3.402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorch Jr., R. F. (1989). Text-signaling devices and their effects on reading and memory processes. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 209–234.10.1007/BF01320135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorch Jr., R. F., & Lorch, E. P. (1996). Effects of organizational signals on free recall of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 38–48.10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorch Jr., R. F., Lorch, E. P., & Inman, W. E. (1993). Effects of signaling topic structure on text recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 281–290.10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, N., Cooper, M., & Sweller, J. (1996). Understanding instructions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 49–63.10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mautone, P. D., & Mayer, R. E. (2001). Signaling as a cognitive guide in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 377–389.10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2005). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 183–200). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816819
   Google Scholar
• McCartney, K., & Rosenthal, R. (2000). Effect size, practical importance, and social policy for children. Child Development, 71, 173–180.10.1111/cdev.2000.71.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1–43.10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVee, M. B., Dunsmore, K., & Gavelek, J. R. (2005). Schema theory revisited. Review of Educational Research, 75, 531–566.10.3102/00346543075004531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. J. F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. J. F., Brandt, D. M., & Bluth, G. J. (1980). Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 72–103.10.2307/747349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R. (2004). Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia. Instructional Science, 32, 99–113.10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021811.66966.1d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30–38.10.1037/0022-0167.38.1.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F. G. W. C. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 429–434.10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F. G. W. C., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive –load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 122–133.10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F. G. W. C., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Adam, J. J. (1994). Measurement of cognitive load in instructional research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 419–430.10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F. G. W. C., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1–4.10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F. G. W. C., Tuovinen, J. E., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Darabi, A. A. (2005). A motivational perspective on the relation between mental effort and performance: Optimizing learner involvement in instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 25–34.10.1007/BF02504795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F. G. W. C., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38, 63–71.10.1207/S15326985EP3801_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., & Kranzler, J. (1995). Self-efficacy beliefs and general mental ability in mathematical problem-solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 426–443.10.1006/ceps.1995.1029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 93–203.
   Google Scholar
• Plass, J. L., Moreno, R., & Brünken, R. (Eds.). (2010). Cognitive load theory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511844744
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, E., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2002). Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction, 12, 61–86.10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00016-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, R. (1990). The effects of cultural schemata on reading processing strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 273–295.10.2307/747692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, R. E., Taylor, M. A., Steffensen, M. S., Shirey, L. L., & Anderson, R. C. (1982). Cultural schemata and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 353–366.10.2307/747524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 3–26). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (1984). Self-efficacy perspective on achievement behavior. Educational Psychologist, 19, 48–58.10.1080/00461528409529281
   Google Scholar
• Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. (1983). Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 82–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shell, D. F., Murphy, C. C., & Bruning, R. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 91–100.10.1037/0022-0663.81.1.91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. E., & Jonides, J. (1997). Working memory: A view from neuroimaging. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 5–42.10.1006/cogp.1997.0658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spyridakis, J. H., & Standal, T. C. (1987). Signals in expository prose: Effects on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 285–298.10.2307/747969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240–261.10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensen, M. S., Joag-Dev, C., & Anderson, R. C. (1979). A cross-cultural perspective on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 10–29.10.2307/747429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295–312.10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 19–30). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816819
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 185–233.10.1207/s1532690xci1203_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.10.1023/A:1022193728205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Needham Heights, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Tabbers, H. K., Martens, R. L., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004). Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: Effects of modality and cueing. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 71–81.10.1348/000709904322848824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillema, H. H. (1995). Changing the professional knowledge and beliefs of teachers: A training study. Learning and Instruction, 5, 291–318.10.1016/0959-4752(95)00020-8
   Google Scholar
• Tuovinen, J., & Sweller, J. (1999). A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 334–341.10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Ayres, P. (2005). Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 5–13.10.1007/BF02504793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 147–177.10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, A. S., Jin, P., & Sweller, J. (1998). Cognitive load and learner expertise: Split-attention and redundancy effects in reading with explanatory notes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 1–21.10.1006/ceps.1997.0951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar