Exploring reading comprehension skill relationships through the G-DINA model

References

• Alderson, J. C. (1990a). Testing reading comprehension skills (part one). Reading in a Foreign Language, 6, 425–438.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, J. C. (1990b). Testing reading comprehension skills (part two). Reading in a Foreign Language, 7, 465–503.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, J. C., & Lukmani, Y. (1989). Cognition and reading: Cognitive levels as embodied in test questions. Reading in a Foreign Language, 5, 253–270.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, G., Tatsuoka, K., & Kostin, I. (1997). The subskills of reading: Rule-space analysis of a multiple-choice test of second language reading comprehension. Language Learning, 47, 423–466. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., de la Torre, J., & Zhang, Z. (2013). Relative and absolute fit evaluation in cognitive diagnosis modeling. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50, 123–140. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00185.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davey, B. (1988). Factors affecting the difficulty of reading comprehension items for successful and unsuccessful readers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 56, 67–76. doi:10.1080/00220973.1988.10806468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. B. (1968). Research in comprehension in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 3, 499–545.10.2307/747153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Torre, J. (2009). DINA model and parameter estimation: A didactic. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34, 115–130. doi:10.3102/1076998607309474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Torre, J. (2011). The generalized DINA model framework. Psychometrika, 76, 179–199. doi:10.1007/s11336-011-9207-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doornik, J. A. (2009). An object-oriented matrix language Ox 6. London: Timberlake Consultants Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, J., de la Torre, J., Chang, H., Henson, R., & Templin, J. (2006). Skills diagnosis with latent variable models. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Drum, P. A., Calfee, R. C., & Cook, L. K. (1981). The effects of surface structure variables on performance in reading comprehension tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 486–514.10.2307/747313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, P., Juel, C., & Griffith, P. (1992). Reading, speaking and the orthographic cipher. In P. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 35–48). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hartz, S. (2002). A Bayesian framework for the unified model for assessing cognitive abilities: Blending theory with practicality (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Hartz, S., & Roussos, L. (2008). The Fusion model for skills diagnosis: Blending theory with practice (ETS research report. no. RR-08-71). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. R. (2013). The complete problem solver. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heaton, J. B. (1991). Writing English language test. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, E. E. (2009). Cognitive diagnostic assessment of L2 reading comprehension ability: Validity arguments for Fusion Model application to LanguEdge assessment. Language Testing, 26, 031–73. doi:10.1177/0265532208097336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junker, B. W., & Sijtsma, K. (2001). Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 258–272. doi:10.1177/01466210122032064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., & Sawaki, Y. (2009). Application of three cognitive diagnosis models to ESL reading and listening assessments. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6, 239–263. doi:10.1080/15434300903079562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leighton, J. P., Gierl, M. J., & Hunka, S. M. (2004). The attribute hierarchy method for cognitive assessment: A variation on Tatsuoka’s rule-space approach. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 205–237. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2004.tb01163.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunzer, E., Waite, M., & Dolan, T. (1979). Comprehension and comprehension tests. In E. Lunzer & K. Gardner (Eds.), The effective use of reading (pp. 37–71). London: Heinemann Educational Books.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & Butler, S. (1984). Evaluating reading diagnostic tests: An application of confirmatory factor analysis to multitrait-multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 307–320. doi:10.1177/014662168400800308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munby, J. L. (1978). Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (1999). Measuring student knowledge and skills: A new framework for assessment. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2000). Database – PISA 2000. Retrieved April 4, 2012, from http://pisa2000.acer.edu.au/
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2002a). PISA 2000 technical report. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2002b). Sample tasks from the PISA 2000 assessment: Reading, mathematical and scientific literacy. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, M., Katzir, T., Wolf, M., & Noam, G. (2010). Examining the construct of reading among dysfluent urban children: A factor analysis approach. Journal of Literacy Research, 42, 124–158. doi:10.1080/10862961003796140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52, 513–536. doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei, S. (2012). The construct validation of Iranian student’s reading comprehension tests through multitrait-multimethod procedure. Life Science Journal, 9, 2118–2126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J. (1972). Some aspects of the correspondence between content structure and cognitive structure in physics instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 225–234. doi:10.1037/h0032652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shermis, M. D., & Long, S. K. (2009). Multitrait-multimethod analysis of FCAT reading and writing or is it writing and reading? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27, 296–311. doi:10.1177/0734282908328639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, M. (2008). Do divisible subskills exist in second language (L2) comprehension? A structural equation modeling approach. Language Testing, 25, 435–464. doi:10.1177/0265532208094272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spearitt, D. (1972). Identification of subskills of reading comprehension by maximum likelihood factor analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 8, 92–111.10.2307/746983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatsuoka, K. (1983). Rule space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 345–354. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1983.tb00212.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Steensel, R., Oostdam, R., & van Gelderen, A. (2013). Assessing reading comprehension in adolescent low achievers: Subskills identification and task specificity. Language Testing, 30, 3–21. doi:10.1177/0265532212440950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Davier, M. (2008). A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 287–307. doi:10.1348/000711007X193957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., & Gierl, M. J. (2011). Using the attribute hierarchy method to make diagnostic inferences about examinees’ cognitive skills in critical reading. Journal of Educational Measurement, 48, 165–187. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2011.00142.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir, C. J., & Porter, D. (1994). The multi-divisible or unitary nature of reading: The language tester between Scylla and Charybdis. Reading in a Foreign Language, 10, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, T. O., Eaves, R. C., & Cox, C. (2001). Factor structure of the woodcock reading mastery tests-revised, forms G and H. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 26, 35–42. doi:10.1177/073724770102600303
   Google Scholar