Testing the model-observer similarity hypothesis with text-based worked examples

References

• Arroyo, I., Woolf, B. P., Royer, J. M., & Tai, M. (2009). Affective gendered learning companion. In Proceedings of the international conference on artificial intelligence and education (pp. 41–48). Brighton: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1981). Self-referent thought: A developmental analysis of self-efficacy. In J. H. Flavell & L. D. Ross (Eds.), Cognitive social development: Frontiers and possible futures (pp. 200–239). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1963). Vicarious reinforcement and imitative learning. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 601–607. doi:10.1037/h0045550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baylor, A. L. & Kim, Y. (2004). Pedagogical agent design: The impact of agent realism, gender, ethnicity, and instructional role. Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 3220, 592–603. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_56
   Google Scholar
• Berger, S. M. (1977). Social comparison, modeling, and perseverance. In J. M. Suls & R. L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 209–234). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
   Google Scholar
• Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. H. (1969). Interpersonal attraction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Boekhout, P., van Gog, T., van de Wiel, M. W. J., Gerards-Last, D., & Geraets, J. (2010). Example-based learning: Effects of model expertise in relation to student expertise. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 557–566. doi:10.1348/000709910X497130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15, 1–40. doi:10.1023/A:1021302408382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braaksma, M. A. H., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (2002). Observational learning and the effects of model-observer similarity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 405–415. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buunk, B. P., Zurriaga, R., Gonzalez-Roma, V., & Subirats, M. (2003). Engaging in upward and downward comparisons as a determinant of relative deprivation at work: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62, 370–388. doi:10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00015-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S., & Williams, W. M. (2014). Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15, 75–141. doi:10.1177/1529100614541236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contreras, J. M., Banaji, M. R., & Mitchell, J. P. (2013). Multivoxel patterns in fusiform face area differentiate faces by sex and race. PLoS ONE, 8, e69684. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, G., & Sweller, J. (1987). Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 347–362. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.79.4.347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harter, S. (1990). Causes, correlates, and the functional role of global self-worth: A life-span perspective. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Kolligian (Eds.), Competence considered (pp. 67–97). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, D. J. (1965). Imitation and retention of film-mediated aggressive peer and adult models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 97–100. doi:10.1037/h0022075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbert, T. S., Renkl, A., Kessler, S., & Reiss, K. (2008). Learning to prove in geometry: Learning from heuristic examples and how it can be supported. Learning and Instruction, 18, 54–65. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogerheide, V., Loyens, S. M. M., & van Gog, T. (2014). Comparing the effects of worked examples and modeling examples on learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 80–91. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Baylor, A. L., & Reed, G. (2003). The impact of image and voice with pedagogical agents. Paper presented at the E-Learn (World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, & Higher Education), Phoenix, Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Kitsantas, A., Zimmerman, B. J., & Cleary, T. (2000). The role of observation and emulation in the development of athletic self-regulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 241–250.
   Google Scholar
• Klassen, R. M., & Usher, E. L. (2010). Self-efficacy in educational settings: Recent research and emerging directions. In T. C. Urdan & S. A. Karabenick (Eds.), The Decade ahead: Theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement (pp. 1–33). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.10.1108/ama
   Google Scholar
• Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Reichersdorfer, E., Vogel, F., Fischer, F., & Reiss, K. (2014). Effects of collaboration scripts and heuristic worked examples on the acquisition of mathematical argumentation skills of teacher students with different levels of prior achievement. Learning and Instruction, 32, 22–36. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachner, A., & Nückles, M. (2015). Bothered by abstractness or engaged by cohesion? Experts’ explanations enhance novices’ deep-learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 21, 101–115. doi:10.1037/xap0000038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M., Liao, K., & Ryu, S. (2007). Children’s responses to computer-synthesized speech in educational media: Gender consistency and gender similarity effects. Human Communication Research, 33, 310–329. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00301.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liew, T., Tan, S., & Jayothisa, C. (2013). The effects of peer-like and expert-like pedagogical agents on learners’ agent perceptions, task-related attitudes, and learning achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 16, 275–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linek, S. B., Gerjets, P., & Scheiter, K. (2010). The speaker/gender effect: Does the speaker’s gender matter when presenting auditory text in multimedia messages? Instructional Science, 38, 503–521. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9115-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2014). Principles based on social cues in multimedia learning: Personalization, voice, image, and embodiment Principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 345–368). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, B. M., Lim, S., & Koedinger, K. R. (2008). When and how often should worked examples be given to students? New results and a summary of the current state of research. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 2176–2181). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., & Flowerday, T. (2006). Students’ choice of animated pedagogical agents in science learning: A test of the similarity-attraction hypothesis on gender and ethnicity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 186–207. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., … Greenwald, A. G. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America, 106, 10593–10597. doi:10.1073/pnas.0809921106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozogul, G., Johnson, A. M., Atkinson, R. K., & Reisslein, M. (2013). Investigating the impact of pedagogical agent gender matching and learner choice on learning outcomes and perceptions. Computers & Education, 67, 36–50. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 429–434. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renkl, A. (2014). Toward an instructionally oriented theory of example-based learning. Cognitive Science, 38, 1–37. doi:10.1111/cogs.12086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodicio, H. G. (2012). Learning from multimedia presentations: The effects of graphical realism and voice gender. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 10, 885–906.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg-Kima, R., Baylor, A., Plant, A., & Doerr, C. (2008). Interface agents as social models for female students: The effects of agent visual presence and appearance on female students’ attitudes and beliefs. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2741–2756. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. (1987). Peer models and children’s behavioral change. Review of Educational Research, 57, 149–174. doi:10.3102/00346543057002149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Hanson, A. R. (1985). Peer models: Influence on children’s self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 313–322. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.77.3.313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Hanson, A. R. (1989). Self-modeling and children’s cognitive skill learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 155–163. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.81.2.155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., Hanson, A. R., & Cox, P. D. (1987). Peer-model attributes and children’s achievement behaviors. Journal of Education & Psychology, 79, 54–61. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.1.54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnenschein, S., & Whitehurst, G. J. (1980). The development of communication: When a bad model makes a good teacher. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 3, 371–390. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(80)90101-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. A. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 59–89. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0201_3
   Google Scholar
• Tarmizi, R., & Sweller, J. (1988). Guidance during mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 424–436. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.80.4.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gog, T., Kester, L., Dirkx, K., Hoogerheide, V., Boerboom, J., & Verkoeijen, P. J. L. (2015). Testing after worked example study does not enhance delayed problem-solving performance compared to restudy. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 265–289. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9297-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gog, T., Kester, L., & Paas, F. (2011). Effects of worked examples, example-problem, and problem-example pairs on novices’ learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 212–218. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gog, T., & Rummel, N. (2010). Example-based learning: Integrating cognitive and social-cognitive research perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 155–174. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9134-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, G. C., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychological values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 767–779. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2002). Acquiring writing revision and self-regulatory skill through observation and emulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 660–668. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar