Role of assessment in second language writing research and pedagogy

References

• Aryadoust, V., & Fox, J. (Eds.). (2016). Trends in language assessment research and practice: The view from the Middle East and the Pacific Rim. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Attali, Y., & Burstein, J. (2005). Automated essay scoring with e-rater® V.2.0 (ETS research report number RR-04-45). Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RR-04-45.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D. (2005). Measuring the mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511490026
   Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. (2009). Designing research into the effects of grammar correction in L2 writing: Not so straightforward. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 136–140.10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapelle, C. A., Cotos, E., & Lee, J. Y. (2015). Validity arguments for diagnostic assessment using automated writing evaluation. Language Testing, 32, 385–405.10.1177/0265532214565386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diab, N. M. (2011). Assessing the relationship between different types of student feedback and the quality of revised writing. Assessing Writing, 16, 274–292.10.1016/j.asw.2011.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Dikli, S. (2010). The nature of automated essay scoring feedback. Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium, 28, 99–134.
   Google Scholar
• Dikli, S., & Bleyle, S. (2014). Automated Essay Scoring feedback for second language writers: How does it compare to instructor feedback? Assessing Writing, 22, 1–17.10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, J. (2002). Genre in the classroom: A linguistic approach. In A. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 91–102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, A., & Medway, P. (Eds.). (1994). Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1987). Spoken and written modes of meaning. In R. Horowitz & S. Jay (Eds.), Comprehending Oral and Written Language (pp. 55–82). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 693–722.10.2307/3587930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, A. M. (2008). Genre awareness for the novice academic student: An ongoing quest. Language Teaching, 41, 237–252.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, M. T. (2015). Explicating validity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(2), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. H. (2011). Diagnosing EAP writing ability using the reduced reparameterized unified model. Language Testing, 28, 509–541.10.1177/0265532211400860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I., & Coniam, D. (2013). Introducing assessment for learning for EFL writing in an assessment of learning examination-driven system in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 34–50.10.1016/j.jslw.2012.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leki, I., Cumming, A., & Silva, T. (2008). A synthesis of research on second language writing in English. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Q., & Brown, D. (2015). Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 66–81.10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., & Kunnan, A. J. (2016). Investigating the application of automated writing evaluation to Chinese undergraduate English majors: A case study of WriteToLearn. Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium, 33, 71–91.
   Google Scholar
• Manchón, R. M. (2009). Broadening the perspective of L2 writing scholarship: The contribution of research on foreign language writing. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 1–19). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. (1992). English text. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/z.59
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151–167.10.1080/00335638409383686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega, L. (2009). Studying writing across EFL contexts: Looking back and moving forward. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 232–255). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Riazi, A. M. (2016). Comparing writing performance in TOEFL-iBT and academic assignments: An exploration of textual features. Assessing Writing, 28, 15–27.10.1016/j.asw.2016.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riazi, A. M. (in press). Mixed methods approaches to studying second language writing. To be published in The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching by John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14, 504–554.10.1177/0741088397014004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, E. (2008). Rater bias patterns in an EFL writing assessment. Language Testing, 25, 463–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, M., & Phakiti, A. (2014). The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing. Assessing Writing, 19, 51–65.10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. Y.-P. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 292–305.10.1016/j.jslw.2008.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Beuningen, C. (2010). Corrective feedback in L2 writing: Theoretical perspectives, empirical insights, and future directions. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Van Beuningen, C. G., De Jong, N. H., & Kuiken, F. (2012). Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning, 62(1), 1–41.10.1111/lang.2012.62.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar