An examination of student- and across-level mediation mechanisms accounting for gender differences in reading performance: a multilevel analysis of reading engagement

References

• Asher, S. R., & Markell, R. A. (1974). Sex differences in comprehension of high- and low-interest reading material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 680–687.10.1037/h0037483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Borkowski, J. G., Weyhing, R. S., & Carr, M. (1988). Effects of attributional retraining on strategy-based reading comprehension in learning-disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 46–53.10.1037/0022-0663.80.1.46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brozo, W. G. (2002). To be a boy, to be a reader: Engaging teen and preteen boys in active literacy. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Brozo, W. G., Shiel, G., & Topping, K. (2007). Engagement in reading: Lessons learned from three PISA countries. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51, 304–315.10.1598/JAAL.51.4.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, L. K. S. (1996). Combined strategy and attributional training for seventh grade average and poor readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 19, 111–127.10.1111/jrir.1996.19.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, K. C., Mak, S. K., Sit, P. S., & Soh, K. C. (2016). A typology of student reading engagement: Preparing for response to intervention in the school curriculum. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 48, 32–42.10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, W. M., Tse, S. K., Lam, J. W. I., & Loh, E. K. Y. (2009). Progress in international reading literacy study 2006 (PIRLS): Pedagogical correlates of fourth-grade students in Hong Kong. Journal of Research in Reading, 32, 293–308.10.1111/jiri.2009.32.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, M. M., & McBride-Chang, C. (2006). Gender, context, and reading: A comparison of students in 43 countries. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 331–362.10.1207/s1532799xssr1004_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C. H. (1996). Keys to successful cognitive and affective intervention with challenging students. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 12, 265–290.10.1080/1057356960120304
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C., & Douglas, J. (2011). Young people’s reading and writing: An in-depth study focusing on enjoyment, behaviour, attitudes and attainment. London: National Literacy Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C., & Foster, A. (2005). Children’s and young people’s reading habits and preferences: The who, what, why, where and when. London: National Literacy Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Clary, L. (2001). Getting adolescents to read. Journal of Reading, 34, 340–345.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 145–170.10.3102/01623737023002145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles, M., & Hall, C. (2001). Gendered reading: Learning from children’s reading choices. Journal of Research in Reading, 25, 96–108.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol. 38, Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237–288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dole, J. A., Brown, K. J., & Trathen, W. (1996). The effects of strategy instruction on the comprehension performance of at-risk students. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 62–88.10.1598/RRQ.31.1.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driskell, N. (2014). Global perspectives: Explaining Taiwan’s dramatic improvement in PISA reading. Retrieved November 20, 2014, from http://www.ncee.org/2014/10/global-perspectives-explaining-taiwans-dramatic-improvement-in-pisa-reading/
   Google Scholar
• Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T. (1996). Educational contexts for engagement in literacy. The Reading Teacher, 49, 432–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T. (Ed.). (2008). Engaging adolescents in reading. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., & Alao, S. (1997). Designing contexts to increase motivations for reading. Educational Psychologist, 32, 95–105.10.1207/s15326985ep3202_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., & Humenick, N. (2004). Motivating students to read: Evidence for classroom practices that increase reading motivation and achievement. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 329–354). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., & Klauda, S. L. (2014). Effects of classroom practices on reading comprehension, engagement, and motivations for adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 49, 387–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., Meter, P. V., McCann, A. D., & Wigfield, A. (1996). Growth of literacy engagement: Changes in motivations and strategies during concept-oriented reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 306–332.10.1598/RRQ.31.3.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., & Soloman, A. (1997). Engagement in reading for young adolescents. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 40, 438–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mobenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–420). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Husain, M., & Millimet, D. L. (2009). The mythical “boy crisis”? Economics of Education Review, 28, 38–48.10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Reading Association. (2002). Examining the evidence. Reading Today, 20, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Kreft, I., & De Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781849209366
   Google Scholar
• Lau, K. L. (2006). Reading strategy use between Chinese good and poor readers: A think-aloud study. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 383–399.10.1111/jrir.2006.29.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, K. L. (2009). Reading motivation, perceptions of reading instruction and reading amount: A comparison of junior and senior secondary students in Hong Kong. Journal of Research in Reading, 32, 366–382.10.1111/jrir.2009.32.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, K. L., & Chan, D. W. (2003). Reading strategy use and motivation among Chinese good and poor readers in Hong Kong. Journal of Research in Reading, 26, 177–190.10.1111/1467-9817.00195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavy, V., & Schlosser, A. (2011). Mechanisms and impacts of gender peer effects at school. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3, 1–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. D. (2011). Testing mediation using multiple regression and structural equation modeling analyses in secondary data. Evaluation Review, 35, 240–268.10.1177/0193841X11412069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, S., & Medford, E. (2011). Gender differences in the strength of association between motivation competency beliefs and reading skill. Educational Research, 53, 85–94.10.1080/00131881.2011.552242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, R., & Mikk, J. (2009). Sex differences in reading achievement. Trames, 13, 2–13. doi:10.3176/tr.2009.1.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., Fritz, M. S., Williams, J., & Lockwood, C. M. (2007). Distribution of the product confidence limits for the indirect effect: Program PRODCLIN. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 384–389.10.3758/BF03193007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mak, S. K. (2013). Explanation of gender differences in reading literacy for 15-year-old students in Macao: Mediating effects of reading engagement ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Macau, Macao.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, G. N. (2008). Accounting for the gender gaps in student performance in reading and mathematics: evidence from 31 countries. Oxford Review of Education, 34, 89–109. doi:10.1080/03054980701565279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Literacy Trust. (2012). Boy’s reading commission. Retrieved September 1, 2014, from http://www.literacytrust.org.uk/policy/nlt_policy/boys_reading_commission
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel Report. (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
   Google Scholar
• Nippold, M. A., Duthie, J. K., & Larson, J. (2005). Free time preferences of older children and young adolescents. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36, 93–102.10.1044/0161-1461(2005/009)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurmi, J. E., Aunola, K., Salmela-Aro, K., & Lindroos, M. (2003). The role of success expectation and task-avoidance in academic performance and satisfaction: Three studies on antecedents, consequences and correlates. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 59–90.10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00014-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2001). Literacy for the world of tomorrow: Further results from PISA 2000. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2003). Reading for change: Performance and engagement across countries: Results from PISA 2000. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2009). PISA 2009 assessment framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2010a). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do: Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Volume I). Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2010b). PISA 2009 results: Learning to learn: Student engagement, strategies and practices (Volume III). Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2012). Closing the gender gap: Act now. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pang, E. S., Muaka, A., Bernhardt, E., & Kamil, M. L. (2003). Teaching reading. Brussels: International Academy of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36, 89–101.10.1207/S15326985EP3602_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., & Fielding, L. (1991). Comprehension instruction. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol. 2 (pp. 815–859). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P. B., Wharton-McDonald, R., & Brown, R. (1998). Transactional instruction of comprehension strategies in the elementary grades. In D. M. Schunk & R. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 42–55). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. P., & Lubienski, S. T. (2011). The development of gender achievement gaps in mathematics and reading during elementary and middle school: Examining direct cognitive assessments and teacher ratings. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 268–302.10.3102/0002831210372249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuder, T. (1993). The genesis of transactional strategies instruction in a reading program for at-risk students. The Elementary School Journal, 94, 183–200.10.1086/461759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–44). New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
   Google Scholar
• Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312.10.2307/270723
   Google Scholar
• Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2013). Sex differences in mathematics and reading achievement are inversely related: Within- and across-nation assessment of 10 years of PISA data. PLoS ONE, 8, e57988. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057988
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tofighi, D., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2011). RMediation: An R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 692–700.10.3758/s13428-011-0076-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Gaer, E., Pustjens, H., Van Damme, J., & De Munter, A. (2006). Tracking and the effects of school-related attitudes on the language achievement of boys and girls. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27, 293–309.10.1080/01425690600750478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Houtte, M. (2004). Gender context of the school and study culture, or how the presence of girls affects the achievement of boys. Educational Studies, 30, 409–423.10.1080/0305569042000310336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, Z., & Fan, X. (2015). Monotonicity of effect sizes: Questioning kappa-squared as mediation effect size measure. Psychological Methods, 20, 193–203.10.1037/met0000029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmore, D. (2005). Resource and peer impacts on girls’ academic achievement: Evidence from a randomized experiment. American Economic Review, 95, 199–203.10.1257/000282805774670158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 420–432.10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Klauda, S. L., McRae, A., & Barbosa, P. (2008). Role of reading engagement in mediating effects of reading comprehension instruction on reading outcomes. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 432–445.10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, I. A. G., & Fung, I. Y. Y. (2002). Small-group composition and peer effects. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 425–447.10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00014-4
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, I. A. G., Parr, J. M., Fung, I. Y. Y., Hattie, J. A. C., & Townsend, M. A. R. (2002). Discussion: Modeling and maximizing peer effects in school. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 521–535.10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00018-1
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., Zyphur, M. J., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models: Problems and solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 695–719.10.1177/1094428108327450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar