The impact of group design projects in engineering on achievement goal orientations and academic outcomes

References

• Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms – Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderman, E. M., & Wolters, C. A. (2006). Goals, values, and affect: Influences on student motivation. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 369–389). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Anderman, L. H., & Anderman, E. M. (1999). Social predictors of changes in students’ achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 21–37. doi:10.1006/ceps.1998.0978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atadero, R. A., Rambo-Hernandez, K. E., & Balgopal, M. M. (2015). Using social cognitive career theory to assess student outcomes of group design projects in statics. Journal of Engineering Education, 104, 55–73.10.1002/jee.20063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baillie, C. (2000). Motivation and attrition in engineering students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25, 145–155.10.1080/030437900308544
   Google Scholar
• Besterfield-Sacre, M., Atman, C., & Shurman, L. (1997). Characteristics of freshman engineering students: Models for determining student attrition in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 86, 139–149.10.1002/jee.1997.86.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating Project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369–398. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., Cudeck, R., & Bollen, K. A. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Editions, 154, 136–136.
   Google Scholar
• Darnon, C., Dompnier, B., Delmas, F., Pulfrey, C., & Butera, F. (2009). Achievement goal promotion at university: Social desirability and social utility of mastery and performance goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 119–134. doi:10.1037/a0012824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dompnier, B., Darnon, C., & Butera, F. (2009). Faking the desire to learn: A clarification of the link between mastery goals and academic achievement. Psychological Science, 20, 939–943. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02384.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairweather, J. (2008). Linking evidence and promising practices in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate education. Washington, DC: Board of Science Education, National Research Council, The National Academies.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541–553. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillaume, D. W., & Khachikian, C. S. (2011). The effect of time-on-task on student grades and grade expectations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36, 251–261.10.1080/02602930903311708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638–645. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.94.3.638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helle, L., Tynjälä, P., & Olkinuora, E. (2006). Project-based learning in post-secondary education – Theory, practice and rubber sling shots. Higher Education, 51, 287–314.10.1007/s10734-004-6386-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez, P. R., Schultz, P. W., Estrada, M., Woodcock, A., & Chance, R. C. (2013). Sustaining optimal motivation: A longitudinal analysis of interventions to broaden participation of underrepresented students in STEM. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 89–107. doi:10.1037/A0029691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136, 422–449. doi:10.1037/A0018947
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 141–184. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9012-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karabenick, S. A., & Collins-Eaglin, J. (1997). Relation of perceived instructional goals and incentives to college students’ use of learning strategies. The Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 331–341.10.1080/00220973.1997.10806608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86.10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima, R. M., Carvalho, D., Flores, M. A., & van Hattum-Jansson, N. (2007). A case study on project led education in engineering: students’ and teachers’ perceptions. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32, 337–347.10.1080/03043790701278599
   Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink, E. A. (2005). The dilemma of performance-approach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students’ motivation and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 197–213.10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Middleton, M. J., Ciani, K. D., Easter, M. A., O’Keefe, P. A., & Zusho, A. (2012). The strength of the relation between performance-approach and performance-avoidance goal orientations: Theoretical, methodological, and instructional implications. Educational Psychologist, 47, 281–301. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.722515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litzler, E., & Young, J. (2012). Understanding the risk of attrition in undergraduate engineering: results from the project to assess climate in engineering. Journal of Engineering, 101, 319–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucena, J. C. (2003). Flexible engineers: History, challenges, and opportunities for engineering education. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 23, 419–435.10.1177/0270467603259875
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487–503. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E. M., Anderman, L. H., Freeman, K. E., … Urdan, T. (2000). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scales. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. (2001). Academic self-handicapping and achievement goals: A further examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 61–75. doi:10.1006/ceps.2000.1041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, J. E., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Engineering education – Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer? Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 3, 2–16.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus User’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Engineering. (2005). Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2005). How students learn sicence in the classroom. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Board. (2007). Moving forward to improve engineering education. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2007/nsb07122/nsb07122.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328–346. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonis, S. A., & Hudson, G. I. (2006). Academic performance of college students: Influence of time spent studying and working. Journal of Education for Business, 81, 151–159.10.3200/JOEB.81.3.151-159
   Google Scholar
• Plant, E. A., Ericsson, K. A., Hill, L., & Asberg, K. (2005). Why study time does not predict grade point average across college students: Implications of deliberate practice for academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 96–116.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachterle, L., & Vinther, O. (1996). Introduction: The role of projects in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 21, 115–120.10.1080/03043799608923394
   Google Scholar
• Senko, C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2011). Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46, 26–47. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.538646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steif, P. S., & Dantzler, J. A. (2005). A statics concept inventory: Development and psychometric analysis. Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 363–371.10.1002/jee.2005.94.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh, R. (2006). The relationship between barrier courses and persistence in engineering. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 8, 215–239.10.2190/3QTU-6EEL-HQHF-XYF0
   Google Scholar
• Taing, M. U., Smith, T., Singla, N., Johnson, R. E., & Chang, C. H. (2013). The relationship between learning goal orientation, goal setting, and performance: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 1668–1675. doi:10.1111/Jasp.12119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tas, Y., & Tekkaya, C. (2010). Personal and contextual factors associated with students’ cheating in science. The Journal of Experimental Education, 78, 440–463.10.1080/00220970903548046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Urdan, T. (2004). Predictors of academic self-handicapping and achievement: Examining achievement goals, classroom goal structures, and culture. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 251–264. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2001). Academic self-handicapping: What we know, what more there is to learn. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 115–138. doi:10.1023/A:1009061303214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar