Publication Cover
Educational Psychology
An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology
Volume 37, 2017 - Issue 10
889
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Prosodic awareness and children’s multisyllabic word reading

, , , &
Pages 1222-1241 | Received 15 Oct 2015, Accepted 12 May 2017, Published online: 24 May 2017

References

  • Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Children thinking and learning about print. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Apel, K., Wilson-Fowler, E. B., Brimo, D., & Perrin, N. A. (2012). Metalinguistic contributions to reading and spelling in second and third grade students. Reading and Writing, 25, 1283–1305. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9317-8
  • Archer, A. L., Gleason, M. M., & Vachon, V. L. (2003). Decoding and fluency: Foundation skills for struggling older readers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26, 89–101. doi:10.2307/1593592
  • Arciuli, J., & Cupples, L. (2003). Effects of stress typicality during speeded grammatical classification. Language and Speech, 46, 353–374. doi:10.1177/00238309030460040101
  • Arciuli, J., & Cupples, L. (2004). Effects of stress typicality during spoken word recognition by native and nonnative speakers of English: Evidence from onset gating. Memory & Cognition, 32, 21–30. doi:10.3758/BF03195817
  • Arciuli, J., & Cupples, L. (2006). The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: Typicality effects and orthographic correlates. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 920–948. doi:10.1080/02724980443000782
  • Arciuli, J., & Cupples, L. (2007). Would you rather ‘embert a cudsert’ or ‘cudsert an embert’? How spelling patterns at the beginning of English disyllables can cue grammatical category. In A. C. Schalley & D. Khlentzos (Eds.), Mental states: Language and cognitive structure (pp. 213–237). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs
  • Arciuli, J., Monaghan, P., & Seva, N. (2010). Learning to assign lexical stress during reading aloud: Corpus, behavioral and computational investigations. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 180–196. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.005
  • Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
  • Blevins, J. (1995). The syllable in phonological theory. In J. A. Goldsmith (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 206–244). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
  • Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189–209). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing, 12, 169–190. doi:10.1023/A:1008131926604
  • Carlisle, J. F., & Nomanbhoy, D. (1993). Phonological and morphological awareness in first graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 177–195. doi:10.1017/S0142716400009541
  • Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., & Richman, B. (1971). The American heritage word frequency book. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Chateau, D., & Jared, D. (2003). Spelling-sound consistency effects in disyllabic word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 255–280. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00521-1
  • Chen, H.-C., & Vaid, J. (2007). Word frequency modulates the basic orthographic syllable structure (BOSS) effect in English polysyllabic word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 52–82. doi:10.1080/01690960500372717
  • Clin, E., Wade-Woolley, L., & Heggie, L. (2009). Prosodic sensitivity and morphological awareness in children’s reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104, 197–213. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.05.005
  • Deacon, S. H. (2012). Sounds, letters and meanings: The independent influences of phonological, morphological and orthographic skills on early word reading accuracy. Journal of Research in Reading, 35, 456–475. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2011.01496.x
  • Deacon, S. H., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223–238. doi:10.1017/S0142716404001110
  • Duncan, L. G., Casalis, S., & Colé, P. (2009). Early metalinguistic awareness of derivational morphology: Observations from a comparison of English and French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 405–440. doi:10.1017/S0142716409090213
  • Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Burley, J. (1997). British pictures vocabulary scales II. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
  • Elliot, C. D., Smith, P., & McUlloch, K. (1996). British ability scales II. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
  • Fear, B. D., Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S. (1995). The strong/weak syllable distinction n the English vocabulary. Computer Speech and Language, 2, 133–142.
  • Frederickson, N., Frith, U., & Reason, R. (1997). Phonological assessment battery. Windsor: NFER.
  • Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. E. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Goswami, U., Gerson, D., & Astruc, L. (2010). Amplitude envelope perception, phonology and prosodic sensitivity in children with developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 23, 995–1019. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9186-6
  • Graddol, D., Cheshire, J., & Swann, J. (1987). Describing language. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  • Guion, S. G., Clark, J. J., Harada, T., & Wayland, R. P. (2003). Factors affecting stress placement for English nonwords include syllabic structure, lexical class, and stress patterns of phonologically similar words. Language and Speech, 46, 403–426. doi:10.1177/00238309030460040301
  • Gutiérrez-Palma, N., Raya-García, M., & Palma-Reyes, A. (2009). Detecting stress patterns is related to children’s performance on reading tasks. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 1–21. doi:10.1017/S0142716408090012
  • Harrison, E., Wood, C., Holliman, A., & Vousden, J. (submitted). The immediate and longer term effectiveness of a speech rhythm-based reading intervention in beginning readers.
  • Heggie, L., Wade-Woolley, L., & Briand, P. (2010, July). Suprasegmental phonological awareness and multisyllabic word reading. Paper presented at the Society for the Scientific Studies of Reading, Berlin, Germany.
  • Holliman, A. J. (2016). Suprasegmental phonology and early reading development: Examining the relative contribution of sensitivity to stress, intonation and timing. In J. Thomson & L. Jarmulowicz (Eds.), Trends in language acquisition research series: Linguistic rhythm and literacy (pp. 25–50). John Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamines.10.1075/tilar
  • Holliman, A. J., Critten, S., Lawrence, T., Harrison, E. C. J., Wood, C., & Hughes, D. J. (2014). Modeling the relationship between prosodic sensitivity and early literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 49, 469–482. doi:10.1002/rrq.82
  • Holliman, A. J., Gutiérrez Palma, N., Critten, S., Wood, C., Cunnane, H., & Pillinger, C. (2016). Examining the independent contribution of prosodic sensitivity to word reading and spelling in early readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 30, 509–521. doi:10.1007/s11145-016-9687-z
  • Holliman, A. J., Williams, G. J., Mundy, I. R., Wood, C., Hart, L., & Waldron, S. (2014). Beginning to disentangle the prosody-literacy relationship: A multi-component measure of prosodic sensitivity. Reading and Writing, 27, 255–266. doi:10.1007/s11145-013-9443-6
  • Holliman, A. J., Wood, C., & Sheehy, K. (2008). Sensitivity to speech rhythm explains individual differences in reading ability independently of phonological awareness. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26, 357–367. doi:10.1348/026151007X241623
  • Holliman, A. J., Wood, C., & Sheehy, K. (2010a). Does speech rhythm sensitivity predict children’s reading ability 1 year later? Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 356–366. doi:10.1037/a0018049
  • Holliman, A. J., Wood, C., & Sheehy, K. (2010b). The contribution of sensitivity to speech rhythm and non-speech rhythm to early reading development. Educational Psychology, 30, 247–267. doi:10.1080/01443410903560922
  • Holliman, A. J., Wood, C., & Sheehy, K. (2012). A cross-sectional study of prosodic sensitivity and reading difficulties. Journal of Research in Reading, 35, 32–48. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01459.x
  • Jarmulowicz, L. (2006). School-aged children’s phonological production of derived English words. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 49, 294–308. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/024)
  • Jarmulowicz, L., Hay, S. E., Taran, V. L., & Ethington, C. A. (2008). Fitting derivational morphophonology into a developmental model of reading. Reading and Writing, 21, 275–297. doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9073-y
  • Jarmulowicz, L., Taran, V. L., & Hay, S. E. (2007). Third graders’ metalinguistic skills, reading skills, and stress production in derived English words. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 50, 1593–1605. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/107)
  • Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Newton, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Kelly, M. H., & Bock, J. K. (1988). Stress in time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 389–403. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.14.3.389
  • Kelly, M. H., Morris, J., & Verrekia, L. (1998). Orthographic cues to lexical stress: Effects on naming and lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 26, 822–832. doi:10.3758/BF03211401
  • Kuo, L., & Anderson, R. C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: A cross-language perspective. Educational Psychologist, 41, 161–180. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4103_3
  • Lovett, M. W., Lacerenza, L., & Borden, S. L. (2000). Putting struggling readers on the PHAST track: A program to integrate phonological and strategy-based remedial reading instruction and maximize outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 458–476. doi:10.1177/002221940003300507
  • Lovett, M. W., Lacerenza, L., Borden, S. L., Frijters, J. C., Steinbach, K. A., & De Palma, M. (2000). Components of effective remediation for developmental reading disabilities: Combining phonological and strategy-based instruction to improve outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 263–283. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.263
  • Miller, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2008). A longitudinal study of the development of reading prosody as a dimension of oral reading fluency in early elementary school children. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 336–354. doi:10.1598/RRQ.43.4.2
  • Mundy, I. R., & Carroll, J. M. (2012). Speech prosody and developmental dyslexia. Reduced phonological awareness in the context of intact phonological representations. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 560–581. doi:10.1080/20445911.2012.662341
  • Nagy, W., Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134–147. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.134
  • National Reading Panel (U.S.), & National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read : An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction : Reports of the subgroups. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.
  • Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the connectionist dual process (CDP++) model. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 106–151. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.04.001
  • Protopapas, A., Gerakaki, S., & Alexandri, S. (2006). Lexical and default stress assignment in reading Greek. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 418–432. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00316.x
  • Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (2000). Lexical and nonlexical print-to-sound translation of disyllabic words and nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 342–364. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2687
  • Ricketts, J., Davies, R., Masterson, J., Stuart, M., & Duff, F. (2016). Evidence for semantic involvement in regular and exception word reading in emergent readers of English. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 150, 330–345. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2016.05.013
  • Roberts, G., Torgesen, J. K., Boardman, A., & Scammacca, N. (2008). Evidence-based strategies for reading instruction of older students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23, 63–69. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2008.00264.x
  • Samuels, S. J., LaBerge, D., & Bremer, C. D. (1978). Units of word recognition: Evidence for developmental changes. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 715–720.10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90433-4
  • Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523
  • Shankweiler, D., Crain, S., Katz, L., Fowler, A. E., Liberman, A. E., Brady, S. A., … Shaywitz, B. A. (1995). Cognitive profiles of reading-disabled children: Comparison of language skills in phonology, morphology, and syntax. Psychological Science, 6, 149–156. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00324.x
  • Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Thomson, J. M., Leong, V., & Goswami, U. (2013). Auditory processing interventions and developmental dyslexia: A comparison of phonemic and rhythmic approaches. Reading and Writing, 26, 139–161. doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9359-6
  • Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 649–667. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(89)90002-8
  • Wade-Woolley, L., & Heggie, L. (2015). Implicit knowledge of word stress and derivational morphology guides skilled readers’ decoding of multisyllabic words. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19, 21–30. doi:10.1080/10888438.2014.947647
  • Wade-Woolley, L., & Heggie, L. (2016). The contributions of prosodic and phonological awareness to reading: A review. In J. Thomson & L. Jarmulowicz (Eds.), Linguistic rhythm and literacy (pp. 3–24). New York, NY: John Benjamins.
  • Weber, R.-M. (2006). Function words in the prosody of fluent reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 258–269. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00307.x
  • Whalley, K., & Hansen, J. (2006). The role of prosodic sensitivity in children’s reading development. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 288–303. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00309.x
  • Wood, C., & Terrell, C. (1998). Poor readers’ ability to detect speech rhythm and perceive rapid speech. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 397–413. doi:10.1111/j.2044-835X.1998.tb00760.x
  • Wood, C., Wade-Woolley, L., & Holliman, A. J. (2009). Phonological awareness: Beyond phonemes. In C. Wood & V. Connelly (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on reading and spelling (pp. 7–23). London: Routledge.
  • Yap, M. J., & Balota, D. A. (2009). Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words. Journal of Memory & Language, 60, 502–529. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.02.001

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.