Examining the ontological and epistemic assumptions of research on metacognition, self-regulation and self-regulated learning

References

• *Abar, B., & Loken, E. (2010). Self-regulated learning and self-directed study in a pre-college sample. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 25–29.10.1016/j.lindif.2009.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ainsworth, S., & Th Loizou, A. (2003). The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams. Cognitive Science, 27, 669–681.10.1207/s15516709cog2704_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Aleven, V., McLaren, B., Roll, I., & Koedinger, K. (2006). Toward meta-cognitive tutoring: A model of help seeking with a cognitive tutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16, 101–128.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L., & Reynolds, R. E. (2009). What is learning anyway? A topographical perspective considered. Educational Psychologist, 44, 176–192.10.1080/00461520903029006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Anderson, D., & Nashon, S. (2007). Predators of knowledge construction: Interpreting students’ metacognition in an amusement park physics program. Science Education, 91, 298–320.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Annevirta, T., & Vauras, M. (2006). Developmental changes of metacognitive skill in elementary children. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74, 197–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 523–535.10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., & Seibert, D. (2004). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students’ ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 344–370.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2003.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., Winters, F. I., Moos, D. C., & Greene, J. A. (2005). Adaptive human scaffolding facilitates adolescents’ self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science, 33, 381–412.10.1007/s11251-005-1273-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Azevedo, R., Greene, J. A., & Moos, D. C. (2007). The effect of a human agent’s external regulation upon college students’ hypermedia learning. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 67–87.10.1007/s11409-007-9014-9
   Google Scholar
• *Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., & Seibert, D. (2004). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students’ conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30, 87–111.10.2190/DVWX-GM1T-6THQ-5WC7
   Google Scholar
• *Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F. I., & Cromley, J. G. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 45–72.10.1007/s11423-007-9067-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Azevedo, R., Winters, F. I., & Moos, D. C. (2004). Can students collaboratively use hypermedia to learn science? The dynamics of self-and other-regulatory processes in an ecology classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31, 215–245.10.2190/HFT6-8EB1-TN99-MJVQ
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• *Bannert, M. (2006). Effects of reflection prompts when learning with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 359–375.10.2190/94V6-R58H-3367-G388
   Google Scholar
• *Bannert, M., & Mengelkamp, C. (2008). Assessment of metacognitive skills by means of instruction to think aloud and reflect when prompted. Does the verbalisation method affect learning? Metacognition and Learning, 3, 39–58.10.1007/s11409-007-9009-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bartels, J. M., & Magun-Jackson, S. (2009). Approach–avoidance motivation and metacognitive self-regulation: The role of need for achievement and fear of failure. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 459–463.10.1016/j.lindif.2009.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2008). Active learning: Effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 296–316.10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Benjamin, A. S., & Bird, R. D. (2006). Metacognitive control of the spacing of study repetitions. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 126–137.10.1016/j.jml.2006.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Berger, J. L., & Karabenick, S. A. (2011). Motivation and students’ use of learning strategies: Evidence of unidirectional effects in mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 21, 416–428.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Berthold, K., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2007). Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes? The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts. Learning and Instruction, 17, 564–577.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bidjerano, T., & Dai, D. Y. (2007). The relationship between the big-five model of personality and self-regulated learning strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 69–81.10.1016/j.lindif.2007.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Blair, C., & Razza, R. P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Development, 78, 647–663.10.1111/cdev.2007.78.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bolhuis, S., & Voeten, M. J. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions of student learning and own learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 10, 77–98.10.1080/13540600320000170936
   Google Scholar
• Box, G. E., & Draper, N. R. (1987). Empirical model-building and response surfaces. Oxford: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• *Bråten, I., Samuelstuen, M. S., & Strømsø, H. I. (2004). Do students’ self-efficacy beliefs moderate the effects of performance goals on self-regulatory strategy use? Educational Psychology, 24, 231–247.10.1080/0144341032000160164
   Google Scholar
• *Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2005). The relationship between epistemological beliefs, implicit theories of intelligence, and self-regulated learning among Norwegian postsecondary students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 539–565.10.1348/000709905X25067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• *Burton, K. D., Lydon, J. E., D’Alessandro, D. U., & Koestner, R. (2006). The differential effects of intrinsic and identified motivation on well-being and performance: Prospective, experimental, and implicit approaches to self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 750–762.10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Butler, D. L., Lauscher, H. N., Jarvis-Selinger, S., & Beckingham, B. (2004). Collaboration and self-regulation in teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 435–455.10.1016/j.tate.2004.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Caprara, G. V., Fida, R., Vecchione, M., Del Bove, G., Vecchio, G. M., Barbaranelli, C., & Bandura, A. (2008). Longitudinal analysis of the role of perceived self-efficacy for self-regulated learning in academic continuance and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 525–534.10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, T. H. (1979). Consciousness in models of human information processing: Primary memory, executive control, and input regulation. In G. Underwood & R. Stevens (Eds.), Aspects of consciousness (Vol. 1, pp. 123–149). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Casillas, A., Robbins, S., Allen, J., Kuo, Y. L., Hanson, M. A., & Schmeiser, C. (2012). Predicting early academic failure in high school from prior academic achievement, psychosocial characteristics, and behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 407–420.10.1037/a0027180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chang, M. (2005). Applying self-regulated learning strategies in a web-based instruction – An investigation of motivation perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18, 217–230.10.1080/09588220500178939
   Google Scholar
• *Cheung, C. S. S., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2012). Why does parents’ involvement enhance children’s achievement? The role of parent-oriented motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 820–832.10.1037/a0027183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Choi, I., Land, S. M., & Turgeon, A. J. (2005). Scaffolding peer-questioning strategies to facilitate metacognition during online small group discussion. Instructional Science, 33, 483–511.10.1007/s11251-005-1277-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Clayson, D. E. (2005). Performance overconfidence: Metacognitive effects or misplaced student expectations? Journal of Marketing Education, 27, 122–129.10.1177/0273475304273525
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997–1003. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Connor, C. M., Ponitz, C. C., Phillips, B. M., Travis, Q. M., Glasney, S., & Morrison, F. J. (2010). First graders’ literacy and self-regulation gains: The effect of individualizing student instruction. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 433–455.10.1016/j.jsp.2010.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corno, L. (2001). Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 191–226). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• *Coutinho, S. A., & Neuman, G. (2008). A model of metacognition, achievement goal orientation, learning style and self-efficacy. Learning Environments Research, 11, 131–151.10.1007/s10984-008-9042-7
   Google Scholar
• *Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Using web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for self-regulated learning. Instructional Science, 33, 513–540.10.1007/s11251-005-1278-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Davis, E. A. (2003). Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 91–142.10.1207/S15327809JLS1201_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *De Grez, L., Valcke, M., & Roozen, I. (2009). The impact of an innovative instructional intervention on the acquisition of oral presentation skills in higher education. Computers & Education, 53, 112–120.10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Dermitzaki, I., Leondari, A., & Goudas, M. (2009). Relations between young students’ strategic behaviours, domain-specific self-concept, and performance in a problem-solving situation. Learning and Instruction, 19, 144–157.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Desoete, A., Roeyers, Herbert, & De Clercq, A. (2003). Can offline metacognition enhance mathematical problem solving? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 188–200.10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinsmore, D. L. (2017). Towards a dynamic, multidimensional model of strategic processing. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 235–268. doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9407-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinsmore, D. L., & Alexander, P. A. (2012). A critical discussion of deep and surface processing: What it means, how it is measured, the role of context, and model specification. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 499–567.10.1007/s10648-012-9198-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinsmore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 391–409.10.1007/s10648-008-9083-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Dresel, M., & Haugwitz, M. (2008). A computer-based approach to fostering motivation and self-regulated learning. The Journal of Experimental Education, 77, 3–20.10.3200/JEXE.77.1.3-20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (2004). Causes and constraints of the shift-to-easier materials effect in the control of study. Memory & Cognition, 32, 779–788.10.3758/BF03195868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ee, J., Moore, P. J., & Atputhasamy, L. (2003). High-achieving Students: their motivational goals, self-regulation and achievement and relationships to their teachers’ goals and strategy-based instruction. High Ability Studies, 14, 23–39.10.1080/13598130304094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Efklides, A., & Petkaki, C. (2005). Effects of mood on students’ metacognitive experiences. Learning and Instruction, 15, 415–431.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Eilam, B., & Aharon, I. (2003). Students’ planning in the process of self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 304–334.10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00042-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Eshel, Y., & Kohavi, R. (2003). Perceived classroom control, self-regulated learning strategies, and academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 23, 249–260.10.1080/0144341032000060093
   Google Scholar
• *Evans, C. J., Kirby, J. R., & Fabrigar, L. R. (2003). Approaches to learning, need for cognition, and strategic flexibility among university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 507–528.10.1348/000709903322591217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ferla, J., Valcke, M., & Schuyten, G. (2008). Relationships between student cognitions and their effects on study strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 271–278.10.1016/j.lindif.2007.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Finn, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2007). The role of memory for past test in the underconfidence with practice effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 238–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzmaurice, G. M., Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (2004). Applied longitudinal analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 21–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• *Fries, S., Dietz, F., & Schmid, S. (2008). Motivational interference in learning: The impact of leisure alternatives on subsequent self-regulation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 119–133.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., Hamlett, C. L., Owen, R., & Schroeter, K. (2003). Enhancing third-grade student’ mathematical problem solving with self-regulated learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 306–315.10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Fung, I. Y. Y., Wilkinson, I. A. G., & Moore, D. W. (2003). L1-assisted reciprocal teaching to improve ESL students’ comprehension of English expository text. Learning and Instruction, 13, 1–31.10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00033-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Garner, J. K. (2009). Conceptualizing the relations between executive functions and self-regulated learning. The Journal of Psychology, 143, 405–426.10.3200/JRLP.143.4.405-426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2013). Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 84–89.10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gijbels, D., & Fryer, L. K. (2014). Introduction. In L. Fryer (Chair), 20th century models of student learning at a 21st century crossroad. Symposium presented at the biennial meeting of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction for SIG 4 Higher Education, Leuven, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• *Glaser, C., & Brunstein, J. C. (2007). Improving fourth-grade students’ composition skills: Effects of strategy instruction and self-regulation procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 297–310.10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Grau, V., & Whitebread, D. (2012). Self and social regulation of learning during collaborative activities in the classroom: The interplay of individual and group cognition. Learning and Instruction, 22, 401–412.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Adolescents’ use of self-regulatory processes and their relation to qualitative mental model shifts while using hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36, 125–148.10.2190/G7M1-2734-3JRR-8033
   Google Scholar
• *Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2009). A macro-level analysis of SRL processes and their relations to the acquisition of a sophisticated mental model of a complex system. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 18–29.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Greene, J. A., Bolick, C. M., & Robertson, J. (2010). Fostering historical knowledge and thinking skills using hypermedia learning environments: The role of self-regulated learning. Computers & Education, 54, 230–243.10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Grigorenko, E. L., Jarvin, L., Diffley, R., III, Goodyear, J., Shanahan, E. J., & Sternberg, R. J. (2009). Are SSATS and GPA enough? A theory-based approach to predicting academic success in secondary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 964–981.10.1037/a0015906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hadwin, A. F., Nesbit, J. C., Jamieson-Noel, D., Code, J., & Winne, P. H. (2007). Examining trace data to explore self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 107–124.10.1007/s11409-007-9016-7
   Google Scholar
• *Hadwin, A. F., Wozney, L., & Pontin, O. (2005). Scaffolding the appropriation of self-regulatory activity: A socio-cultural analysis of changes in teacher–student discourse about a graduate research portfolio. Instructional Science, 33, 413–450.10.1007/s11251-005-1274-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Mason, L. H. (2006). Improving the writing, knowledge, and motivation of struggling young writers: Effects of self-regulated strategy development with and without peer support. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 295–340.10.3102/00028312043002295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hilden, K. R., & Pressley, M. (2007). Self-regulation through transactional strategies instruction. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23, 51–75.10.1080/10573560600837651
   Google Scholar
• *Hofer, M., Schmid, S., Fries, S., Dietz, F., Clausen, M., & Reinders, H. (2007). Individual values, motivational conflicts, and learning for school. Learning and Instruction, 17, 17–28.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofweber, T. (2011). Logic and ontology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2014 ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/logic-ontology/
   Google Scholar
• *Hong, E., Peng, Y., & Rowell, L. L. (2009). Homework self-regulation: Grade, gender, and achievement-level differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 269–276.10.1016/j.lindif.2008.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Howell, A. J., & Watson, D. C. (2007). Procrastination: Associations with achievement goal orientation and learning strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 167–178.10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Huff, J. D., & Nietfeld, J. L. (2009). Using strategy instruction and confidence judgments to improve metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 161–176.10.1007/s11409-009-9042-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hurme, T., Palonen, T., & Järvelä, S. (2006). Metacognition in joint discussions: An analysis of the patterns of interaction and the metacognitive content of the networked discussions in mathematics. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 181–200.10.1007/s11409-006-9792-5
   Google Scholar
• *Ifenthaler, D. (2012). Determining the effectiveness of prompts for self-regulated learning in problem-solving scenarios. Educational Technology & Society, 15, 38–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Iiskala, T., Vauras, M., Lehtinen, E., & Salonen, P. (2011). Socially shared metacognition of dyads of pupils in collaborative mathematical problem-solving processes. Learning and Instruction, 21, 379–393.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Järvelä, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2011). Socially constructed self-regulated learning and motivation regulation in collaborative learning groups. Teachers College Record, 113, 350–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2009). Emotion control in collaborative learning situations: Do students regulate emotions evoked by social challenges. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 463–481.10.1348/000709909X402811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jones, L. B., Rothbart, M. K., & Posner, M. I. (2003). Development of executive attention in preschool children. Developmental Science, 6, 498–504.10.1111/desc.2003.6.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, L. V. (1952). Test of hypotheses: One-sided vs. two-sided alternatives. Psychological Bulletin, 49, 43–46. doi:10/1037/h0056832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A., Katz, I., & Flum, H. (2012). Motivational theory in educational practice: Knowledge claims, challenges, and future directions. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, S. Graham, J. M. Royer, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, Vol 2: Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (pp. 165–194). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.10.1037/13274-000
   Google Scholar
• *Kaplan, A., Lichtinger, E., & Gorodetsky, M. (2009). Achievement goal orientations and self-regulation in writing: An integrative perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 51–69.10.1037/a0013200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Karpicke, J. D. (2009). Metacognitive control and strategy selection: Deciding to practice retrieval during learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 469–486.10.1037/a0017341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kauffman, D. F. (2004). Self-regulated learning in web-based environments: Instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategy use, metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30, 139–161.10.2190/AX2D-Y9VM-V7PX-0TAD
   Google Scholar
• *Kauffman, D. F., Ge, X., Xie, K., & Chen, C. H. (2008). Prompting in web-based environments: Supporting self-monitoring and problem solving skills in college students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38, 115–137.10.2190/EC.38.2.a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Keller, J., & Bless, H. (2006). Regulatory fit and cognitive performance: The interactive effect of chronic and situationally induced self-regulatory mechanisms on test performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 393–405.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kitsantas, A., Winsler, A., & Huie, F. (2008). Self-regulation and ability predictors of academic success during college: A predictive validity study. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 42–68.
   Google Scholar
• *Kitsantas, A., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2009). College students’ homework and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-regulatory beliefs. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 97–110.10.1007/s11409-008-9028-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Klassen, R. M. (2010). Confidence to manage learning: The self-efficacy for self-regulated learning of early adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33, 19–30.10.1177/073194871003300102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Klassen, R. M., Krawchuk, L. L., & Rajani, S. (2008). Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 915–931.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Klassen, R. M., & Kuzucu, E. (2009). Academic procrastination and motivation of adolescents in Turkey. Educational Psychology, 29, 69–81.10.1080/01443410802478622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Klein, H. J., Noe, R. A., & Wang, C. (2006). Motivation to learn and course outcomes: The impact of delivery mode, learning goal orientation, and perceived barriers and enablers. Personnel Psychology, 59, 665–702.10.1111/peps.2006.59.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Klomegah, R. Y. (2007). Predictors of academic performance of university students: An application of the goal efficacy model. College Student Journal, 41, 407–415.
   Google Scholar
• *Koriat, A. (2008). Easy comes, easy goes? The link between learning and remembering and its exploitation in metacognition. Memory & Cognition, 36, 416–428.10.3758/MC.36.2.416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Koriat, A., Ackerman, R., Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2009). The memorizing effort heuristic in judgments of learning: A developmental perspective. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 265–279.10.1016/j.jecp.2008.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2005). Illusions of competence in monitoring one’s knowledge during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 187–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kornell, N., & Metcalfe, J. (2006). Study efficacy and the region of proximal learning framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 609–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kostons, D., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2012). Training self-assessment and task-selection skills: A cognitive approach to improving self-regulated learning. Learning and Instruction, 22, 121–132.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2006). Disentangling achievement orientation and goal setting: Effects on self-regulatory processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 900–916.10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kramarski, B. (2004). Making sense of graphs: does metacognitive instruction make a difference on students’ mathematical conceptions and alternative conceptions? Learning and Instruction, 14, 593–619.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kramarski, B., & Gutman, M. (2006). How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical e-learning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 24–33.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00157.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2009). Investigating preservice teachers’ professional growth in self-regulated learning environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 161–175.10.1037/a0013101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2010). Preparing preservice teachers for self-regulated learning in the context of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 20, 434–447.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kramarski, B., & Mizrachi, N. (2006). Online discussion and self-regulated learning: Effects of instructional methods on mathematical literacy. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 218–231.10.3200/JOER.99.4.218-231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 178–181.10.1111/1467-8721.00088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kuhn, D., & Pease, M. (2006). Do children and adults learn differently? Journal of Cognition and Development, 7, 279–293.10.1207/s15327647jcd0703_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 805–820.10.1037/a0032583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Labuhn, A. S., Zimmerman, B. J., & Hasselhorn, M. (2010). Enhancing students’ self-regulation and mathematics performance: The influence of feedback and self-evaluative standards. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 173–194.10.1007/s11409-010-9056-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Langendyk, V. (2006). Not knowing that they do not know: Self-assessment accuracy of third-year medical students. Medical Education, 40, 173–179.10.1111/med.2006.40.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Law, Y. K., Chan, C. K., & Sachs, J. (2008). Beliefs about learning, self-regulated strategies and text comprehension among Chinese children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 51–73.10.1348/000709907X179812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lee, H. W., Lim, K. Y., & Grabowski, B. L. (2010). Improving self-regulation, learning strategy use, and achievement with metacognitive feedback. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 629–648.10.1007/s11423-010-9153-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Leelawong, K., & Biswas, G. (2008). Designing learning by teaching agents: The Betty’s Brain system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 18, 181–208.
   Google Scholar
• *Lee, S. W. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Students’ perceptions of collaboration, self-regulated learning, and information seeking in the context of Internet-based learning and traditional learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 905–914.10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 60, 14–24.10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Litman, J. A., Hutchins, T. L., & Russon, R. K. (2005). Epistemic curiosity, feeling-of-knowing, and exploratory behaviour. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 559–582.10.1080/02699930441000427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Loyens, S. M., Rikers, R. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2008). Relationships between students’ conceptions of constructivist learning and their regulation and processing strategies. Instructional Science, 36, 445–462.10.1007/s11251-008-9065-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lubliner, S., & Smetana, L. (2005). The effects of comprehensive vocabulary instruction on title I students’ metacognitive word-learning skills and reading comprehension. Journal of Literacy Research, 37, 163–200.10.1207/s15548430jlr3702_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lüftenegger, M., Schober, B., Van de Schoot, R., Wagner, P., Finsterwald, M., & Spiel, C. (2012). Lifelong learning as a goal – Do autonomy and self-regulation in school result in well prepared pupils? Learning and Instruction, 22, 27–36.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Luo, W., Paris, S. G., Hogan, D., & Luo, Z. (2011). Do performance goals promote learning? A pattern analysis of Singapore students’ achievement goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 165–176.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace, F. C., Belfiore, P. J., & Hutchinson, J. M. (2001). Operant theory and research on self-regulation. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 39–66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• *Magno, C. (2010). The role of metacognitive skills in developing critical thinking. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 137–156.10.1007/s11409-010-9054-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Maki, R. H., Shields, M., Wheeler, A. E., & Zacchilli, T. L. (2005). Individual differences in absolute and relative metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 723–731.10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Manlove, S., Lazonder, A. W., & de Jong, T. (2007). Software scaffolds to promote regulation during scientific inquiry learning. Metacognition Learning, 2, 141–155.10.1007/s11409-007-9012-y
   Google Scholar
• *Marchand, G., & Skinner, E. A. (2007). Motivational dynamics of children’s academic help-seeking and concealment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 65–82.10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Marsh, H. W., Hau, K., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., & Peschar, J. L. (2006). OECD’s brief self-report measure of educational psychology’s most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing, 6, 311–360.10.1207/s15327574ijt0604_1
   Google Scholar
• *Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Ariasi, N. (2010). Searching the Web to learn about a controversial topic: Are students epistemically active? Instructional Science, 38, 607–633.10.1007/s11251-008-9089-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mason, L. H. (2004). Explicit self-regulated strategy development versus reciprocal questioning: Effects on expository reading comprehension among struggling readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 283–296.10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Masui, C., & De Corte, E. (2005). Learning to reflect and to attribute constructively as basic components of self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 351–372.10.1348/000709905X25030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Matthews, J. S., Ponitz, C. C., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Early gender differences in self-regulation and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 689–704.10.1037/a0014240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *McCabe, J. (2011). Metacognitive awareness of learning strategies in undergraduates. Memory & Cognition, 39, 462–476.10.3758/s13421-010-0035-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaslin, M., & Hickey, D. T. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A Vygotskian view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 227–252). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• *McClelland, M. M., Acock, A. C., & Morrison, F. J. (2006). The impact of kindergarten learning-related skills on academic trajectories at the end of elementary school. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 471–490.10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *McClelland, M. M., Cameron, C. E., Connor, C. M., Farris, C. L., Jewkes, A. M., & Morrison, F. J. (2007). Links between behavioral regulation and preschoolers’ literacy, vocabulary, and math skills. Developmental Psychology, 43, 947–959.10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.947
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombs, B. L. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A phenomenological view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 67–124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McCrudden, M. T., Magliano, J. P., & Schraw, G. (2010). Exploring how relevance instructions affect personal reading intentions, reading goals and text processing: A mixed methods study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 229–241.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 121–131.10.1037/a0033546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Meijer, J., Veenman, M. V. J., & van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2006). Metacognitive activities in text-studying and problem-solving: Development of a taxonomy. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 209–237.10.1080/13803610500479991
   Google Scholar
• *Metcalfe, J., & Greene, M. J. (2007). Metacognition of agency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 184–199.10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mevarech, Z., & Fridkin, S. (2006). The effects of IMPROVE on mathematical knowledge, mathematical reasoning, and meta-cognition. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 85–97.10.1007/s11409-006-6584-x
   Google Scholar
• *Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarski, B. (2003). The effects of metacognitive training versus worked-out examples on students’ mathematical reasoning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 449–471.10.1348/000709903322591181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Meyer, E., Abrami, P. C., Wade, C. A., Aslan, O., & Deault, L. (2010). Improving literacy and metacognition with electronic portfolios: Teaching and learning with ePEARL. Computers & Education, 55, 84–91.10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. (2010). Mistreating psychology in the decades of the brain. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 716–743.10.1177/1745691610388774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mills, C. M., & Keil, F. C. (2004). Knowing the limits of one’s understanding: The development of an awareness of an illusion of explanatory depth. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 1–32.10.1016/j.jecp.2003.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mills, N., Pajares, F., & Herron, C. (2007). Self-efficacy of college intermediate French students: Relation to achievement and motivation. Language Learning, 57, 417–442.10.1111/lang.2007.57.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A. W., & McConnell, J. R., III (2012). A historical review of Contemporary Educational Psychology from 1995 to 2010. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37, 136–147.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C. M., Lerner, R. M., & Newell, K. M. (2014). Developmental systems theory and methodology: A view of the issues. In P. C. M. Molenaar, R. M. Lerner, & K. M. Newell (Eds.), Handbook of developmental systems theory & methodology (pp. 3–18). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• *Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008). Monitoring, planning, and self-efficacy during learning with hypermedia: The impact of conceptual scaffolds. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1686–1706.10.1016/j.chb.2007.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: The role of prior domain knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 270–298.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Muis, K. R. (2008). Epistemic profiles and self-regulated learning: Examining relations in the context of mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 177–208.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Muis, K. R., & Franco, G. M. (2009). Epistemic beliefs: Setting the standards for self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 306–318.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 3–53.10.1006/ceps.1999.1019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Narciss, S., Proske, A., & Koerndle, H. (2007). Promoting self-regulated learning in web-based learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1126–1144.10.1016/j.chb.2006.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51, 102–116.10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesselroade, J. R., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2010). Emphasizing intraindividual variability in the study of development over the life span: Concepts and issues. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.-in-Chief) & W. F. Overton (Vol Ed.), Handbook of life-span development: Vol 1. Cognition, biology, and methods (pp. 30–54). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• *Neuenschwander, R., Röthlisberger, M., Cimeli, P., & Roebers, C. M. (2012). How do different aspects of self-regulation predict successful adaptation to school? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 353–371.10.1016/j.jecp.2012.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. (2000). Null hypothesis significance testing: A review of an old and continuing controversy. Psychological Methods, 5, 241–301.10.1037/1082-989X.5.2.241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the postsecondary classroom. The Journal of Experimental Educational, 74, 7–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2006). The effect of distributed monitoring exercises and feedback on performance, monitoring accuracy, and self-efficacy. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 159–179.10.1007/s10409-006-9595-6
   Google Scholar
• *Ning, H. K., & Downing, K. (2010). The reciprocal relationship between motivation and self-regulation: A longitudinal study on academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 682–686.10.1016/j.lindif.2010.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Nückles, M., Hübner, S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Enhancing self-regulated learning by writing learning protocols. Learning and Instruction, 19, 259–271.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Núñez, J. C., Cerezo, R., Bernardo, A., Rosário, P., Valle, A., Fernández, E., & Suárez, N. (2011). Implementation of training programs in self-regulated learning strategies in Moodle format: Results of a experience in higher education. Psicothema, 23, 274–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ommundsen, Y. (2003). Implicit theories of ability and self-regulation strategies in physical education classes. Educational Psychology, 23, 141–157.10.1080/01443410303224
   Google Scholar
• *Ommundsen, Y., Haugen, R., & Lund, T. (2005). Academic self-concept, implicit theories of ability, and self-regulation strategies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 461–474.10.1080/00313830500267838
   Google Scholar
• Overton, W. F. (2014). Relational developmental systems and developmental science: A focus on methodology. In P. C. M. Molenaar, R. M. Lerner, & K. M. Newell (Eds.), Handbook of developmental systems theory & methodology (pp. 19–65). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Oyserman, D., Bybee, D., & Terry, K. (2006). Possible selves and academic outcomes: How and when possible selves impel action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 188–204.10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Palmer, D. H. (2003). Investigating the relationship between refutational text and conceptual change. Science Education, 87, 663–684.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Pappas, S., Ginsburg, H. P., & Jiang, M. (2003). SES differences in young children’s metacognition in the context of mathematical problem solving. Cognitive Development, 18, 431–450.10.1016/S0885-2014(03)00043-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., Byrnes, J. P., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Constructing theories, identities, and actions of self-regulated learners. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 253–288). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• *Peacock, M., & Ho, B. (2003). Student language learning strategies across eight disciplines. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13, 179–200.10.1111/ijal.2003.13.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Pedhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction. Stamford, CT: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• *Perels, F., Dignath, C., & Schmitz, B. (2009). Is it possible to improve mathematical achievement by means of self-regulation strategies? Evaluation of an intervention in regular math classes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24, 17–31.10.1007/BF03173472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Perels, F., Gürtler, T., & Schmitz, B. (2005). Training of self-regulatory and problem-solving competence. Learning and Instruction, 15, 123–139.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Peskin, J., & Astington, J. W. (2004). The effects of adding metacognitive language to story texts. Cognitive Development, 19, 253–273.10.1016/j.cogdev.2004.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, C. S. (1992). Reasoning and the logic of things: The Cambridge conference lectures of 1898. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544–555.10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Anderman, E. M., & Klobucar, C. (1994). Intraindividual differences in motivation and cognition in students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 360–370.10.1177/002221949402700603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ponitz, C. C., McClelland, M. M., Matthews, J. S., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). A structured observation of behavioral self-regulation and its contribution to kindergarten outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45, 605–619.10.1037/a0015365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2009). Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 437–447.10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Radosevich, D. J., Vaidyanathan, V. T., Yeo, S., & Radosevich, D. M. (2004). Relating goal orientation to self-regulatory processes: A longitudinal field test. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 207–229.10.1016/S0361-476X(03)00032-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Richter, T., & Schmid, S. (2010). Epistemological beliefs and epistemic strategies in self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 47–65.10.1007/s11409-009-9038-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers, J. L. (2010). The epistemology of mathematical and statistical modeling: A quiet methodological revolution. American Psychologist, 65, 1–12.10.1037/a0018326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Rodriguez, C. M. (2009). The impact of academic self-concept, expectations and the choice of learning strategy on academic achievement: the case of business students. Higher Education Research & Development, 28, 523–539.10.1080/07294360903146841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Rosário, P., Núñez, J. C., González-Pienda, J., Valle, A., Trigo, L., & Guimarães, C. (2010). Enhancing self-regulation and approaches to learning in first-year college students: A narrative-based programme assessed in the Iberian Peninsula. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25, 411–428.10.1007/s10212-010-0020-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Rouis, S., Limayem, M., & Salehi-Sangari, E. (2011). Impact of Facebook usage on students’ academic achievement: Role of self-regulation and trust. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9, 961–994.
   Google Scholar
• *Rozendaal, J. S., Minnaert, A., & Boekaerts, M. (2005). The influence of teacher perceived administration of self-regulated learning on students’ motivation and information-processing. Learning and Instruction, 15, 141–160.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ruban, L. M., McCoach, D. B., McGuire, J. M., & Reis, S. M. (2003). The differential impact of academic self-regulatory methods on academic achievement among university students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 268–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rund, B. R. (1998). A review of longitudinal studies of cognitive functions in schizophrenia patients. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 24, 425–435.10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Salili, F., & Lai, M. K. (2003). Learning and motivation of Chinese students in Hong Kong: A longitudinal study of contextual influences on students’ achievement orientation and performance. Psychology in the Schools, 40, 51–70.10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Santhanam, R., Sasidharan, S., & Webster, J. (2008). Using self-regulatory learning to enhance e-learning-based information technology training. Information Systems Research, 19, 26–47.10.1287/isre.1070.0141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Schmitz, B., & Wiese, B. S. (2006). New perspectives for the evaluation of training sessions in self-regulated learning: Time-series analyses of diary data. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 64–96.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Schoonen, R., Gelderen, A., Glopper, K., Hulstijn, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P., & Stevenson, M. (2003). First language and second language writing: The role of linguistic knowledge, speed of processing, and metacognitive knowledge. Language Learning, 53, 165–202.10.1111/1467-9922.00213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 351–371.10.1007/BF02212307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (2001). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 125–152). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• *Schwartz, N. H., Andersen, C., & Hong, N. (2004). The influence of metacognitive skills on learners’ memory of information in a hypermedia environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31, 77–93.10.2190/JE7W-VL6W-RNYF-RD4M
   Google Scholar
• *Seaton, M., Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2010). Big-fish-little-pond effect generalizability and moderation – Two sides of the same coin. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 390–433.10.3102/0002831209350493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sha, L., Looi, C. K., Chen, W., Seow, P., & Wong, L. H. (2012). Recognizing and measuring self-regulated learning in a mobile learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 718–728.10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2012). Learning presence as a moderator in the community of inquiry model. Computers & Education, 59, 316–326.10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Shell, D. F., & Husman, J. (2008). Control, motivation, affect, and strategic self-regulation in the college classroom: A multidimensional phenomenon. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 443–459.10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195152968.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• *Sitzmann, T., Bell, B. S., Kraiger, K., & Kanar, A. M. (2009). A multilevel analysis of the effect of prompting self-regulation in technology-delivered instruction. Personnel Psychology, 62, 697–734.10.1111/peps.2009.62.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2010). Sometimes you need a reminder: The effects of prompting self-regulation on regulatory processes, learning, and attrition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 132–144.10.1037/a0018080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Skibbe, L. E., Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., & Jewkes, A. M. (2011). Schooling effects on preschoolers’ self-regulation, early literacy, and language growth. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 42–49.10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Soenens, B., Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Dochy, F., & Goossens, L. (2012). Psychologically controlling teaching: Examining outcomes, antecedents, and mediators. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 108–120.10.1037/a0025742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Son, L. K. (2004). Spacing one’s study: Evidence for a metacognitive control strategy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 601–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Souchay, C., & Isingrini, M. (2004). Age related differences in metacognitive control: Role of executive functioning. Brain and Cognition, 56, 89–99.10.1016/j.bandc.2004.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Souvignier, E., & Mokhlesgerami, J. (2006). Using self-regulation as a framework for implementing strategy instruction to foster reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 16, 57–71.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Stahl, E., Pieschl, S., & Bromme, R. (2006). Task complexity, epistemological beliefs and metacognitive calibration: An exploratory study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 319–338.10.2190/1266-0413-387K-7J51
   Google Scholar
• *Stankov, L., & Lee, J. (2008). Confidence and cognitive test performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 961–976.10.1037/a0012546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Stegers-Jager, K. M., Cohen-Schotanus, J., & Themmen, A. P. (2012). Motivation, learning strategies, participation and medical school performance. Medical Education, 46, 678–688.10.1111/med.2012.46.issue-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steup, M. (2014). Epistemology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2014 ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/epistemology/
   Google Scholar
• *Sungur, S., & Tekkaya, C. (2006). Effects of problem-based learning and traditional instruction on self-regulated learning. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 307–320.10.3200/JOER.99.5.307-320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 191–204.10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Swalander, L., & Taube, K. (2007). Influences of family based prerequisites, reading attitude, and self-regulation on reading ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 206–230.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Taraban, R., Kerr, M., & Rynearson, K. (2004). Analytic and pragmatic factors in college students’ metacognitive reading strategies. Reading Psychology, 25, 67–81.10.1080/02702710490435547
   Google Scholar
• *Teong, S. K. (2003). The effect of metacognitive training on mathematical word-problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 46–55.10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00005.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Thiede, K. W., & Anderson, M. C. M. (2003). Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 129–160.10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00011-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66–73.10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Thiede, K. W., Dunlosky, J., Griffin, T. D., & Wiley, J. (2005). Understanding the delayed-keyword effect on metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1267–1280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorndike, E. L. (1918). The nature, purpose and general methods of measurement of educational products. In G. M. Whipple (Ed.), The Seventeenth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part II – The Measurement of Educational Products). Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• *Torrance, M., Fidalgo, R., & García, J. (2007). The teachability and effectiveness of cognitive self-regulation in sixth-grade writers. Learning and Instruction, 17, 265–285.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracey, D. H., & Morrow, L. M. (2012). Lenses on reading: An introduction to theories and models. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Trainin, G., & Swanson, H. L. (2005). Cognition, metacognition, and achievement of college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 261–272.10.2307/4126965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Tsai, C. W., & Shen, P. D. (2009). Applying web-enabled self-regulated learning and problem-based learning with initiation to involve low-achieving students in learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1189–1194.10.1016/j.chb.2009.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Tseng, F. C., & Kuo, F. Y. (2010). The way we share and learn: An exploratory study of the self-regulatory mechanisms in the professional online learning community. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1043–1053.10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Tseng, W., Dörnyei, Z., & Schmitt, N. (2006). A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 27, 78–102.10.1093/applin/ami046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Tuckman, B. W. (2003). The effect of learning and motivation strategies training on college students’ achievement. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 430–437.10.1353/csd.2003.0034
   Google Scholar
• *Usher, E. L. (2009). Sources of middle school students’ self-efficacy in mathematics: A qualitative investigation. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 275–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of academic and self-regulatory efficacy beliefs of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 125–141.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning a validation study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 443–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Valle, A., Núñez, J. C., Cabanach, R. G., González-Pienda, J. A., Rodríguez, S., Rosário, P., … Muñoz-Cadavid, M. A. (2008). Self-regulated profiles and academic achievement. Psicothema, 20, 724–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Vallotton, C., & Ayoub, C. (2011). Use your words: The role of language in the development of toddlers’ self-regulation. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 169–181.10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Vancouver, J. B., & Kendall, L. N. (2006). When self-efficacy negatively relates to motivation and performance in a learning context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1146–1153.10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *van den Boom, G., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2007). Effects of elicited reflections combined with tutor or peer feedback on self-regulated learning and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 17, 532–548.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *van den Boom, G., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & van Gog, T. (2004). Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web-based learning environment: Effects on students’ self-regulated learning competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 551–567.10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language Learning, 53, 463–496.10.1111/1467-9922.00232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Vandergrift, L. (2005). Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness and proficiency in L2 listening. Applied Linguistics, 26, 70–89.10.1093/applin/amh039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Vandergrift, L., Goh, C., Mareschal, C. J., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Language Learning, 56, 431–462.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00373.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Language Learning, 60, 470–497.10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *van Gog, T., Paas, F., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Witte, P. (2005). Uncovering the problem-solving process: Cued retrospective reporting versus concurrent and retrospective reporting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 237–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., Dochy, F., Mouratidis, A., … Beyers, W. (2012). Identifying configurations of perceived teacher autonomy support and structure: Associations with self-regulated learning, motivation and problem behavior. Learning and Instruction, 22, 431–439.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Veenman, M. V. J., & Beishuizen, J. J. (2004). Intellectual and metacognitive skills of novices while studying texts under conditions of text difficulty and time constraint. Learning and Instruction, 14, 621–640.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Veenman, M. V. J., Kok, R., & Blöte, A. W. (2005). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills in early adolescence. Instructional Science, 33, 193–211.10.1007/s11251-004-2274-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Veenman, M. V. J., & Spaans, M. A. (2005). Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 159–176.10.1016/j.lindif.2004.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Veenman, M. V. J., Wilhelm, P., & Beishuizen, J. J. (2004). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills from a developmental perspective. Learning and Instruction, 14, 89–109.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2003.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Vidal-Abarca, E., Mañá, A., & Gil, L. (2010). Individual differences for self-regulating task-oriented reading activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 817–826.10.1037/a0020062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Volet, S., & Mansfield, C. (2006). Group work at university: Significance of personal goals in the regulation strategies of students with positive and negative appraisals. Higher Education Research & Development, 25, 341–356.10.1080/07294360600947301
   Google Scholar
• *Vrugt, A., & Oort, F. J. (2008). Metacognition, achievement goals, study strategies and academic achievement: pathways to achievement. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 123–146.10.1007/s11409-008-9022-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wall, K., Higgins, S., & Smith, H. (2005). ‘The visual helps me understand the complicated things’: Pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 851–867.10.1111/bjet.2005.36.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Walls, T. A., & Little, T. D. (2005). Relations among personal agency, motivation, and school adjustment in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 23–31.10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wang, Q., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2009). The motivational landscape of early Adolescence in the United States and China: A longitudinal investigation. Child Development, 80, 1272–1287.10.1111/cdev.2009.80.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wang, S. L., & Wu, P. Y. (2008). The role of feedback and self-efficacy on web-based learning: The social cognitive perspective. Computers & Education, 51, 1589–1598.10.1016/j.compedu.2008.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wang, T. H. (2011). Developing Web-based assessment strategies for facilitating junior high school students to perform self-regulated learning in an e-Learning environment. Computers & Education, 57, 1801–1812.10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wei, F. Y. F., Wang, Y. K., & Klausner, M. (2012). Rethinking college students’ self-regulation and sustained attention: Does text messaging during class influence cognitive learning? Communication Education, 61, 185–204.10.1080/03634523.2012.672755
   Google Scholar
• Weinert, F. E., & Helmke, A. (1995). Interclassroom differences in instructional quality and interindividual differences in cognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 30, 15–20.10.1207/s15326985ep3001_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Whipp, J. L., & Chiarelli, S. (2004). Self-regulation in a web-based course: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52, 5–21.10.1007/BF02504714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Whitebread, D., Coltman, P., Pasternak, D. P., Sangster, C., Grau, V., Bingham, S., … Demetriou, D. (2009). The development of two observational tools for assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 63–85.10.1007/s11409-008-9033-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wilson, N. S., & Bai, H. (2010). The relationships and impact of teachers’ metacognitive knowledge and pedagogical understandings of metacognition. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 269–288.10.1007/s11409-010-9062-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 153–190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• *Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. (2003). Self-regulating studying by objectives for learning: Students’ reports compared to a model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 259–276.10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00041-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wirth, J., & Klieme, E. (2003). Computer-based assessment of problem solving competence. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10, 329–345.10.1080/0969594032000148172
   Google Scholar
• Witherington, D. C. (2011). Taking emergence seriously: The centrality of circular causality for dynamic systems approaches to development. Human Development, 54, 66–92.10.1159/000326814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wolters, C. A. (2003). Understanding procrastination from a self-regulated learning perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 179–187.10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Xu, M., Benson, S. N. K., Mudrey-Camino, R., & Steiner, R. P. (2010). The relationship between parental involvement, self-regulated learning, and reading achievement of fifth graders: A path analysis using the ECLS-K database. Social Psychology of Education, 13, 237–269.10.1007/s11218-009-9104-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Young, M. R. (2005). The motivational effects of the classroom environment in facilitating self-regulated learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 27, 25–40.10.1177/0273475304273346
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• *Zohar, A., & David, A. B. (2008). Explicit teaching of meta-strategic knowledge in authentic classroom situations. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 59–82.10.1007/s11409-007-9019-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Zuffianò, A., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M., Kanacri, B. P. L., Di Giunta, L., Milioni, M., & Caprara, G. V. (2013). Academic achievement: The unique contribution of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning beyond intelligence, personality traits, and self-esteem. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 158–162.10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar