Does high perceptual load assist in reducing the seductive details effect?

References

• Abercrombie, S. (2013). Transfer effects of adding seductive details to case-based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(2), 149–157. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abercrombie, S., Hushman, C. J., & Carbonneau, K. J. (2019). The impact of seductive details and signaling on analogical transfer. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(1), 38–47. doi:10.1002/acp.3475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becklen, R., & Cervone, D. (1983). Selective looking and the noticing of unexpected events. Memory & Cognition, 11, 601–608. doi:10.3758/BF03198284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caparos, S., & Linnell, K. J. (2010). The spatial focus of attention is controlled at perceptual and cognitive levels. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(5), 1080. doi:10.1037/a0020367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright-Finch, U., & Lavie, N. (2007). The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness. Cognition, 102(3), 321–340. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cierniak, G., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2009). Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load? Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 315–324. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Crook, C., & Gu, X. (2019). How new technology is addressed by researchers in Educational Studies: Approaches from high-performing universities in China and the UK. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1173. online preprint: doi:10.1111/bjet.12750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eitel, A., Bender, L., & Renkl, A. (2019). Are seductive details seductive only when you think they are relevant? An experimental test of the moderating role of perceived relevance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(1), 20–30. doi:10.1002/acp.3479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, S., & Lavie, N. (2007). High perceptual load makes everybody equal: Eliminating individual differences in distractibility with load. Psychological Science, 18(5), 377–382. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01908.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, S., & Lavie, N. (2008). Failures to ignore entirely irrelevant distractors: The role of load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14(1), 73. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.14.1.73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Y., Xie, Y., & Liu, X. (2018). AI 2.0 and educational informationization: Highlights of the third US-China smart education conference. TechTrends, 62(4), 327–328. doi:10.1007/s11528-018-0304-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, R., Gillingham, M. G., & White, C. S. (1989). Effects of “seductive details” on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cognition and Instruction, 6(1), 41–57. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0601_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R., Britt, M. A., Brown, W., Cribb, G., George, M., Greenleaf, C., & Project, R. (2016). Disciplinary literacies and learning to read for understanding: A conceptual framework for disciplinary literacy. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 219–246. doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(2), 371–398. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01081.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, C. M., Murphy, G., & Januszewski, J. (2017). Under high perceptual load, observers look but do not see. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(4), 431–437. doi:10.1002/acp.3335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harp, S. F., & Maslich, A. A. (2005). The consequences of including seductive details during lecture. Teaching of Psychology, 32(2), 100–103. doi:10.1207/s15328023top3202_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 549–571. doi:10.3102/00346543060004549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, G., Kuo, F., Chen, N., & Ho, H. (2014). Effects of an integrated concept mapping and web-based problem-solving approach on students’ learning achievements, perceptions and cognitive loads. Computers & Education, 71, 77–86. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivisto, M., & Revonsuo, A. (2009). The effects of perceptual load on semantic processing under inattention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 864–868. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.5.864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(2), 75–82. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, N., & Cox, S. (1997). On the efficiency of visual selective attention: Efficient visual search leads to inefficient distractor rejection. Psychological Science, 8(5), 395–398. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00432.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, N., & Tsal, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 56(2), 183–197. doi:10.3758/BF03213897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehman, S., Schraw, G., McCrudden, M. T., & Hartley, K. (2007). Processing and recall of seductive details in scientific text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(4), 569–587. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Gao, Y., & Zhang, D. (2016). To speak like a TED speaker: A case study of TED motivated English public speaking study in EFL teaching. Higher Education Studies, 6(1), 53–59. doi:10.5539/hes.v6n1p53
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. Y., Holmqvist, K., Miyoshi, K., & Ashida, H. (2017). Effects of detailed illustrations on science learning: An eye-tracking study. Instructional Science, 45(5), 557–581. doi:10.1007/s11251-017-9417-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Q. (2006). The worldwide significance of Chinese aesthetics in the twenty-first century. Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 1(1), 33–40. doi:10.1007/s11466-005-0007-y
   Google Scholar
• Liu, R. D. (2010). Psychological research in educational technology in China. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(4), 593–606. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01088.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, J. S., & Lavie, N. (2011). Visual perceptual load induces inattentional deafness. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 1780–1789. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0144-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack, A., Pappas, Z., Silverman, M., & Gay, R. (2002). What we see: Inattention and the capture of attention by meaning. Consciousness and Cognition, 11(4), 488–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marciano, H., & Yeshurun, Y. (2015). Perceptual load in different regions of the visual scene and its relevance for driving. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 57(4), 701–716. doi:10.1177/0018720814556309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia leaning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 43–71). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.005
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., Dow, G., & Mayer, S. (2003). Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent-based microworlds? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 806–813. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., Griffith, E., Jurkowitz, I. T. N., & Rothman, D. (2008). Increased interestingness of extraneous details in a multimedia science presentation leads to decreased learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 329–339. doi:10.1037/a0013835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R. (2005). Instructional technology: promise and pitfalls. In L. Pytlik Zillig, M. Bodvarsson, & R. Bruning (Eds.), Technology-based education: Bringing researchers and practitioners together (pp. 1–19). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, R. (2006). Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method-affects-learning hypothesis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), 149–158. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00170.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R. (2007). Optimising learning from animations by minimizing cognitive load: Cognitive and affective consequences of signaling and segmentation methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 765–781. doi:10.1002/acp.1348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, S., & Dalton, P. (2016). Out of touch? Visual load induces inattentional numbness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 761. doi:10.1037/xhp0000218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, G., & Greene, C. M. (2016). Perceptual load affects eyewitness accuracy and susceptibility to leading questions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1322), 1–10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01322
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, G., & Greene, C. M. (2017). Load theory behind the wheel: Perceptual and cognitive load effects. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 71(3), 191–202. doi:10.1037/cep0000107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, G., Groeger, J. A., & Greene, C. M. (2016). Twenty years of load theory-Where are we now, and where should we go next? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1316–1340. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0982-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F. G. W. C., & Sweller, J. (2014). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 27–42). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paas, F. G. W. C., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 6(4), 351–371. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, B., Flowerday, T., & Brünken, R. (2015). Cognitive and affective effects of seductive details in multimedia learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 267–278. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, B., Moreno, R., Seufert, T., & Brünken, R. (2011). Does cognitive load moderate the seductive details effect? A multimedia study. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 5–10. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Liu, Y. (2005). Orthography to phonology and meaning: Comparisons across and within writing systems. Reading and Writing, 18, 193–210. doi:10.1007/s11145-004-2344-y
   Google Scholar
• Peshkam, A., Mensink, M. C., Putnam, A. L., & Rapp, D. N. (2011). Warning readers to avoid irrelevant information: When being vague might be valuable. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(3), 219–231. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plass, J., Moreno, R., & Brünken, R. (Eds.). (2010). Cognitive load theory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rey, G. D. (2012). A review of research and a meta‐analysis of the seductive details effect. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 216–237. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ro, T., Friggel, A., & Lavie, N. (2009). Musical expertise modulates the effects of visual perceptual load. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(4), 671–674. doi:10.3758/APP.71.4.671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, C. A., & Wiley, J. (2006). An examination of the seductive details effect in terms of working memory capacity. Memory & Cognition, 34(2), 344–355. doi:10.3758/BF03193412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W. (2014). Integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 72–103). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, A., Marcus, N., & Ayres, P. (2012). The transient information effect: Investigating the impact of segmentation on spoken and written text. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(6), 848–853. doi:10.1002/acp.2885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). When graphics improve liking but not learning from online lessons. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1618–1625. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 123–138. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296. doi:10.1023/A:1022193728205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., & Adesope, O. O. (2016). Exploring the effects of seductive details with the 4-phase model of interest. Learning and Motivation, 55, 65–77. doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2016.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., & Adesope, O. O. (2017). Do focused self-explanation prompts overcome seductive details? A multimedia study. Educational Technology & Society, 20, 47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., & Duff, B. R. L. (2016). All loads are not equal: Distinct influences of perceptual load and cognitive load on peripheral ad processing. Media Psychology, 19(4), 589–613. doi:10.1080/15213269.2015.1108204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., McBride, C., Zhou, Y., Malatesha Joshi, R., & Farver, J. A. M. (2018). Becoming literate in Chinese: a comparison of native-speaking and non-native-speaking children. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(3), 511–524. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J. (2018). What makes learning Chinese characters difficult? The voice of students from English secondary schools. Journal of Chinese Writing Systems, 2(1), 35–41. doi:10.1177/2513850217748501
   Google Scholar
• Yue, C. L., & Bjork, E. L. (2017). Using selective redundancy to eliminate the seductive details effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(5), 565–571. doi:10.1002/acp.3348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, F., & Liu, Y. (2014). A study of secondary school English teachers’ beliefs in the context of curriculum reform in China. Language Teaching Research, 18(2), 187–204. doi:10.1080/08824096.2016.1270821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar