Comparing face-to-face and computer-mediated collaboration when teaching EFL writing skills

References

• Abrams, Z. (2019). Collaborative writing and text quality in Google Docs. Language Learning & Technology, 23, 22–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AbuSeileek, A. (2012). The effect of computer-assisted cooperative learning methods and group size on the EFL learners’ achievement in communication skills. Computers & Education, 58(1), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Althaus, S. (1997). Computer-mediated communication in the university classroom: An experiment with on-line discussion. Communication Education, 46(3), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529709379088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barile, A., & Durso, F. (2002). Computer-mediated communication in collaborative writing. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00040-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00360.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1992). The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(2), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1992.tb01017.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y., Liu, T., & Paas, F. (2018). Cognitive resources allocation in computer-mediated dictionary assisted learning: From word meaning to inferential comprehension. Computers & Education, 127, 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W. (2019). An exploratory study on the role of L2 collaborative writing on learners’ subsequent individually composed texts. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(6), 563–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00455-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Côté, S., & Gaffney, C. (2018). The effect of synchronous computer-mediated communication on beginner L2 learners’ foreign language anxiety and participation. The Language Learning Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2018.1484935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x01003922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, P., French, A., & Jakeman, V. (2014). The official Cambridge guide to IELTS for academic & general training. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P., & Evans, M. (2011). Interactive tabletops in education. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(4), 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9127-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducate, L., Anderson, L., & Moreno, N. (2011). Wading through the world of wikis: An analysis of three wiki projects. Foreign Language Annals, 44(3), 495–524. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2011.01144.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuente, M. (2003). Is SLA interactionalist theory relevant to CALL? A study on the effects of computer-mediated interaction on L2 vocabulary acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(1), 47–81. https://doi.org/10.1076/call.16.1.47.15526
   Google Scholar
• Geary, D. (2012). Evolutionary educational psychology. In K. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 597–621). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Geary, D., & Berch, D. (2016). Evolution and children's cognitive and academic development. In D. Geary & D. Berch (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on child development and education (pp. 217–249). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S. (2006). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4), JCMC444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00106.x
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt, J. (2005). Toward an understanding of how threads die in asynchronous computer conferences. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(4), 567–589. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1404_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirvela, A. (2007). Computer-mediated communication and the linking of students, text, and author on an ESL writing course listserv. Computers and Composition, 24(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2006.12.004
   Google Scholar
• Hulstijn, J. (2006). Psycholinguistic perspective on second language acquisition. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (Vol. 11, pp. 701–713). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jepson, K. (2005). Conversations-and negotiated interaction-in text and voice chat rooms. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 79–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, D., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2018). The curious case of improving foreign language listening skills by reading rather than listening: An expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 1139–1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9427-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, D., Renandya, W., & Zhang, L. J. (2017). Evaluating ELT multimedia courseware from the perspective of cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(7), 726–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1359187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, D., & Zhang, L. (2020). Collaborating with ‘familiar’ strangers in mobile-assisted environments: The effect of socializing activities on learning EFL writing. Computers & Education, 150, 103841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C., & Mayer, R. (2012). An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(2), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory: How many types of load does it really need? Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9150-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D., & Judd, C. (1986). Consequences of violating the independence assumption in analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin, 99(3), 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, G., & Bikowski, D. (2010). Developing collaborative autonomous learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: Attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220903467335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H. (2014). Learning opportunities in synchronous computer-mediated communication and face-to-face interaction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.692386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, R. (2013). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (4th ed.). Sage Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. (2009). A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: United brains for complex tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 21(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9095-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., Kirschner, F., & Zambrano, J. (2018). From cognitive load theory to collaborative cognitive load theory. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9277-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leppink, J., Paas, F., van der Vleuten, C., van Gog, T., & van Merriënboer, J. (2013). Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1058–1072. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0334-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2013). Patterns of computer-mediated interaction in small writing groups using wikis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.631142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, J. (2003). Assessing online collaborative learning: Process and product. Computers & Education, 40(4), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.631142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAteer, E., Tolmie, A., Duffy, C., & Corbett, J. (1997). Computer-mediated communication as a learning resource. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13(4), 228–235. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2729.1997.00024.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montag, C., Becker, B., & Gan, C. (2018). The multipurpose application WeChat: A review on recent research. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2247–2248. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, J. (1979). Fundamentals of experimental design (3rd ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Negari, G. (2011). A study on strategy instruction and EFL learners’ writing skill. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2), 299–307. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v1n2p299
   Google Scholar
• O’Malley, C., Langton, S., Anderson, A., Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Bruce, V. (1996). Comparison of face-to-face and video-mediated interaction. Interacting with Computers, 8(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0953-5438(96)01027-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oskoz, A., & Elola, I. (2014). Promoting foreign language collaborative writing through the use of Web 2.0 tools and tasks. In M. González-Lloret & L. Ortega (Eds.), Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks (pp. 115–148). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2012). An evolutionary upgrade of cognitive load theory: Using the human motor system and collaboration to support the learning of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 24(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9179-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passig, D., & Schwartz, G. (2007). Collaborative writing: Online versus frontal. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(3), 395–412.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rouhshad, A., Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2016). The nature of negotiations in face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication in pair interactions. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 514–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815584455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobl, C. (2014). Affordances of Web 2.0 technologies for collaborative advanced writing in a foreign language. CALICO Journal, 31(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.31.1.1-18
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., & Chang, Y. (2012). Blogging to learn: Becoming EFL academic writers through collaborative dialogues. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 43–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (2008). Instructional implications of David C. Geary’s evolutionary educational psychology. Educational Psychologist, 43(4), 214–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520802392208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (2010a). Cognitive load theory: Recent theoretical advances. In J. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brünken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 29–47). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (2010b). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, L., Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2010). Pair interactions and mode of communication: Comparing face-to-face and computer mediated communication. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 27.1–27.24. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.33.3.02tan
   Google Scholar
• Vakili, S., & Ebadi, S. (2019). Exploring EFL learners’ developmental errors in academic writing through face-to-face and computer-mediated dynamic assessment. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1698616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meijden, H., & Veenman, S. (2005). Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication in a primary school setting. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(5), 831–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Merriënboer, J., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent development and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7–26.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, S., Yeomans, P., & Wheeler, D. (2008). The good, the bad and the wiki: Evaluating student-generated content for collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 987–995. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00799.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D., Crittenden, V., Keo, T., & McCarty, P. (2012). The use of social media: An exploratory study of usage among digital natives. Journal of Public Affairs, 12(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1414
   Google Scholar
• Yim, S., & Warschauer, M. (2017). Web-based collaborative writing in L2 contexts: Methodological insights from text mining. Language Learning & Technology, 21(1), 146–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, B., & Warschauer, M. (2015). Participation, interaction, and academic achievement in an online discussion environment. Computers & Education, 84, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar