When birds of the same feather fly together: the impact of achievement goal compatibility in collaborative learning

References

• Baranik, L. E., Stanley, L. J., Bynum, B. H., & Lance, C. E. (2010). Examining the construct validity of mastery-avoidance achievement goals: A meta-analysis. Human Performance, 23(3), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2010.488463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, K. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 706–722. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.80.5.706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández-Ortega, B., & Sese, F. J. (2013). Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Computers & Education, 62, 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Jackman, R. W. (1985). Regression diagnostics: An expository treatment of outliers and influencial cases. Sociological Methods & Research, 13(4), 510–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124185013004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruffee, K. A. (1999). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge (2nd ed.). John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Church, M. A., Elliot, A. J., & Gable, S. L. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeShon, R. P., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Schmidt, A. M., Milner, K. R., & Wiechmann, D. (2004). A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1035–1056. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Dolmans, D. H. J. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2006). What do we know about cognitive and motivational effects of small group tutorials in problem-based learning? Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 11(4), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9012-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1577–1613. https://doi.org/10.2307/256822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 461–475. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(2), 43–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-8327.1993.tb00605.x
   Google Scholar
• Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sulliva, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184–191. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.3.184-192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 638–645. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.94.3.638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A., Yuill, N., & Luckin, R. (2008). The influence of context-specific and dispositional achievement goals on children's paired collaborative interaction. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(Pt 3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709907X267067
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Bromme, R. (2007). Coding discussions and discussing coding: Research on collaborative learning in computer-supported environments. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 460–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1996). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 1017–1044). Simon and Schuster Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2013). Work groups and teams in organizations: Review update. In N. Schmitt & S. Highhouse (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 12. Industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 412–469). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei1214
   Google Scholar
• Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristof-Brown, A. L., & Stevens, C. K. (2001). Goal congruence in project teams: Does the fit between members' personal mastery and performance goals matter? The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1083–1095. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(2011), 486–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., Wormington, S. V., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Roseth, C. J. (2017). A short-term longitudinal study of stability and change in achievement goal profiles. Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liem, A. D., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 486–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink, E. A. (2005). The dilemma of performance-approach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students’ motivation and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2001). Multiple goals, multiple contexts: The dynamic interplay between personal goals and contextual goal stresses. In S. Volet & S. Jarvela (Eds.), Motivation in context: Theoretical advances and methodological implications (pp. 251–269). Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Littleton, K., & Häkkinen, P. (1999). Learning together: Understanding the processes of computer-based collaborative learning. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 20–30). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• McGraw, K. o., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.1.4.390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, H. A., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Achievement goals as predictors of achiement-relevant processes prior to task engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.94.2.381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Education Association. (2014). Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An educator’s guide to the “Four Cs.” National Education Association. http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/A-Guide-to-Four-Cs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Noordzij, G., Van Hooft, E. A. J., Van Mierlo, H., Van Dam, A., & Born, M. P. (2013). The effects of a learning-goal orientation training on self-regulation: A field experiment among unemployed job seekers. Personnel Psychology, 66(3), 723–755. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., & Beaubien, J. M. (2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 128–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poortvliet, P. M., Janssen, O., Van Yperen, N. W., & Van De Vliert, E. (2007). Achievement goals and interpersonal behavior: How mastery and performance goals shape information exchange. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(10), 1435–1447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207305536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, C. O. L. H. (2008). A multi-level, multi-conceptualization perspective of al orientation in teams. In V. I. Sessa & M. London (Eds.), Work group learning: Understanding, improving and assessing how groups learn in organizations (xxiv, pp. 149–173). Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.0.1) [Computer Software]. (No. 3). R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A., & Congdon, R. (2017). HLM 7.03 for Windows [Computer software]. Scientific Software International, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. E. O. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 69–97). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents’ motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 437–460. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038002437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, H. G. (2000). Assumptions underlying self-directed learning may be false. Medical Education, 34(4), 243–245. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.0656a.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, H. G., Rotgans, J. I., & Yew, E. H. J. (2011). The process of problem-based learning: What works and why. Medical Education, 45(8), 792–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04035.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönbrodt, F. D., & Humberg, S. (2018). RSA: An R package for response surface analysis (Version 0.9.13) [Software]. https://cran.r-project.org/package=RSA
   Google Scholar
• Senko, C., & Miles, K. M. (2008). Pursuing their own learning agenda: How mastery-oriented students jeopardize their class performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 561–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(4), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9183-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thijs, J., & Verkuyten, M. (2009). Students' anticipated situational engagement: the roles of teacher behavior, personal engagement, and gender. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 170(3), 268–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221320903218323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Boxtel, C., Van Der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10(4), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00002-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VandeWalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57(6), 995–1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164497057006009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijnia, L., Loyens, S. M. M., & Derous, E. (2011). Investigating effects of problem-based versus lecture-based learning environments on student motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar