Publication Cover
Educational Psychology
An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology
Volume 43, 2023 - Issue 1
583
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Let’s be rational: worked examples supplemented textbooks improve conceptual and fraction knowledge

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1-21 | Received 30 Jan 2021, Accepted 01 Nov 2022, Published online: 13 Nov 2022

References

  • Acock, A.C. (2012). What to do about missing values. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13621-002
  • Adams, D. M., McLaren, B. M., Durkin, K., Mayer, R. E., Rittle-Johnson, B., Isotani, S., & van Velsen, M. (2014). Using erroneous examples to improve mathematics learning with a web-based tutoring system. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.053
  • Atkinson, R. K., Renkl, A., & Merrill, M. M. (2003). Transitioning from studying examples to solving problems: Effects of self-explanation prompts and fading worked-out steps. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 774–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.774
  • Bailey, D. H., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Geary, D. C. (2012). Competence with fractions predicts gains in mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113(3), 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.06.004
  • Barbieri, C. A., & Booth, J. L. (2020). Mistakes on display: Incorrect examples refine equation solving and algebraic feature knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(4), 862–878. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3663
  • Barbieri, C. A., Miller-Cotto, D., & Booth, J. L. (2019). Lessening the load of misconceptions: Design-based principles for algebra learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(3), 381–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1573428
  • Barbieri, C. A., Young, L. K., Newton, K. J., & Booth, J. L. (2021). Predicting middle school profiles of algebra performance using fraction knowledge. Child Development, 92(5), 1984–2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13568
  • Barbieri, C., & Booth, J. L. (2016). Support for struggling students in algebra: Contributions of incorrect worked examples. Learning and Individual Differences, 48, 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.04.001
  • Berthold, K., Eysink, T. H. S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations. Instructional Science, 37(4), 345–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9051-z
  • Booth, J. L., & Siegler, R. S. (2008). Numerical magnitude representations influence arithmetic learning. Child Development, 79(4), 1016–1031. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01173.x
  • Booth, J. L., Lange, K. E., Koedinger, K. R., & Newton, K. J. (2013). Using example problems to improve student learning in algebra: Differentiating between correct and incorrect examples. Learning and Instruction, 25, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.002
  • Booth, J. L., McGinn, K. M., Young, L. K., & Barbieri, C. (2016). Simple practice doesn’t necessarily make perfect: Evidence from the worked example effect. Policy Insights from Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215601691
  • Booth, J. L., Newton, K. J., & Twiss-Garrity, L. K. (2014). The impact of fraction magnitude knowledge on algebra performance and learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 118, 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.09.001
  • Booth, J. L., Oyer, M. H., Paré-Blagoev, E. J., Elliot, A., Barbieri, C., Augustine, A. A., & Koedinger, K. R. (2015). Learning algebra by example in real-world classrooms. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8(4), 530–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2015.1055636
  • Burke-Miller, S. (2012). Intent-to-treat analysis. In S. Boslaugh (Ed.), Encyclopedia of epidemiology (p. 546). SAGE Publications.
  • DeWolf, M., & Vosniadou, S. (2015). The representation of fraction magnitudes and the whole number bias reconsidered. Learning and Instruction, 37, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.07.002
  • Durkin, K., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2012). The effectiveness of using incorrect examples to support learning about decimal magnitude. Learning and Instruction, 22(3), 206–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.11.001
  • Fulkerson, W. O. (2013). 2012 National survey of science and mathematics education: Status of middle school mathematics. Horizon Research. http://www.horizon-research.com/2012-national-survey-of-science-and-mathematics-education-status-of-middle-school-science
  • Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_4
  • Lappan, G., Fey, J., Fitzgerald, W., Friel, S., & Philips, E. (2006). Connected mathematics 2. Prentice Hall (School Division).
  • Mazzocco, M. M. M., & Devlin, K. T. (2008). Parts and holes: Gaps in rational numbersense in children with vs. without mathematical learning disability. Developmental Science, 11(5), 681–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00717.x
  • McCoy, C. E. (2017). Understanding the intention-to-treat principle in randomized controlled trials. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 18(6), 1075–1078. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2017.8.35985
  • McNeil, N. M. (2014). A change-resistance account of children’s difficulties understanding mathematical equivalence. Child Development Perspectives, 8(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12062
  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards (CCSS-M). http://www.corestandards.org/
  • National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. US Department of Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED500486.pdf
  • Newton, K. J., Willard, C., & Teufel, C. (2014). An examination of the ways that students with learning disabilities solve fraction computation problems. The Elementary School Journal, 115(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1086/676949
  • Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2020). Cognitive-load theory: Methods to manage working memory load in the learning of complex tasks. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(4), 394–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420922183
  • Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32(1/2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021806.17516.d0
  • Renkl, A., Atkinson, R. K., & Große, C. S. (2004). How fading worked solution steps works –A cognitive load perspective. Instructional Science, 32(1/2), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021815.74806.f6
  • Resnick, I., Jordan, N. C., Hansen, N., Rajan, V., Rodrigues, J., Siegler, R. S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2016). Developmental growth trajectories in understanding of fraction magnitude from fourth through sixth grade. Developmental Psychology, 52(5), 746–757. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000102
  • Resnick, I., Rinne, L., Barbieri, C. A., & Jordan, N. C. (2019). Children’s reasoning about decimals and its relation to fraction learning and mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(4), 604–618. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000309
  • Rittle-Johnson, B. (2017). Developing mathematics knowledge. Child Development Perspectives, 11(3), 184–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12229
  • Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 346–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.346
  • Roschelle, J., Feng, M., Murphy, R. F., & Mason, C. A. (2016). Online mathematics homework increases student achievement. AERA Open, 2(4), 233285841667396–233285841667312. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416673968
  • Siegler, R. S., & Chen, Z. (2008). Differentiation and integration: Guiding principles for analyzing cognitive change. Developmental Science, 11(4), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00689.x
  • Siegler, R. S., & Booth, J. L. (2004). Development of numerical estimation in young children. Child Development, 75(2), 428–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00684.x
  • Siegler, R. S., Duncan, G. J., Davis-Kean, P. E., Duckworth, K., Claessens, A., Engel, M., Susperreguy, M. I., & Chen, M. (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological Science, 23(7), 691–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612440101
  • Stafylidou, S., & Vosniadou, S. (2004). The development of students’ understanding of the numerical value of fractions. Learning and Instruction, 14(5), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.015
  • Stein, M. K., & Lane, S. (1996). Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/1380361960020103
  • Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7
  • Sweller, J. (2006). The worked example effect and human cognition. Learning and Instruction, 16(2), 165–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.02.005
  • Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. A. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2(1), 59–89. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0201_3
  • Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer.
  • Ye, A., Resnick, I., Hansen, N., Rodrigues, J., Rinne, L., & Jordan, N. C. (2016). Pathways to fraction learning: Numerical abilities mediate the relation between early cognitive competencies and later fraction knowledge. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 152, 242–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.08.001

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.