Influence of teacher innovative behaviour on students’ academic self-efficacy and intrinsic goal orientation

References

• Ainley, J., & Carstens, R. (2018, November). Teaching and learning international survey (TALIS) 2018 conceptual framework. (Working Paper No. 187). https://doi.org/10.1787/799337c2-en
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997–1013. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambedkar, BR, & Anand, S. (2014). Annihilation of caste: The annotated critical edition, S. Anand (Ed.). Verso, London, 2014
   Google Scholar
• Artino, A. R. (2005). Review of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (pp. 1–24). University of Connecticut.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2019). Assessing creativity with the consensual assessment technique. In I. LebudaVlad & P. Glăveanu (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of social creativity research (pp. 27–37). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawuro, F. A., Shamsuddin, A. L. I. N. A., Wahab, E., Adenuga, K. I., & Ndaghu, J. T. (2019). Motivational mechanisms on teachers’ innovative behaviour-a systematic review approach. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(6), 239–245.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, S. (2014). Connecting teaching practice to student efficacy in undergraduate mathematics (Publication No. 1567773). [Master’s Thesis, Eastern Michigan University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blazar, D., & Kraft, M. A. (2017). Teacher and teaching effects on students’ attitudes and behaviors. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1), 146–170. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716670260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolshakova, V. L. J., Johnson, C. C., & Czerniak, C. M. (2011). “It depends on what science teacher you got”: Urban science self-efficacy from teacher and student voices. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(4), 961–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-011-9346-2
   Google Scholar
• Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, race, and gender in middle school science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7(4), 15. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v7.i4.10
   Google Scholar
• Broussard, S. C. (2004). The relationship between classroom motivation and academic achievement in elementary-school-aged children. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 33(2), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X04269573
   Google Scholar
• Carson, S. (2006). Creativity and mental illness. Yale’s Mind Matters Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Chand, V. S. (2012). Innovative primary school teachers at work. Ahmedabad: Sristi Innovations. Retrieved June 5, 2018 from http://www.inshodh.org/upload/resource_papers/TEACHERS-AS-TRANSFORMER-Innovative-Primary-School-Teachers-at-work-7005.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chand, V. S. (2014a). Socio-educational entrepreneurship within the public sector: Leveraging teacher-driven innovations for improvement. In A. W. Wiseman (Ed.), International educational innovation and public sector entrepreneurship: International perspectives on education and society (Vol. 23, pp.59–82). Emerald Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chand, V. S. (2014b). Teachers as transformers: Innovations in Gujarat’s state schools. Retrieved from http://www.inshodh.org/upload/resource_papers/Schools_English-6372.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chand, V. S., Kuril, S., Deshmukh, K. S., & Avadhanam, R. M. (2021). Assessing teacher innovations: Expert versus peer ratings. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(2), 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2020-0185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, C. W., & Chapman, E. (2017). Construct validation of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire in a Singapore high school sample. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 7(2), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.5539/jedp.v7n2p107
   Google Scholar
• Clifton, R. A. (2013, September). Obtaining better teachers for Canadian public schools: A review of the teacher effectiveness research literature. Barbara Mitchell Centre for Improvement in Education, Fraser Institute. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/obtaining-better-teachers-for-canadian-public-schools.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Credé, M., & Phillips, L. A. (2011). A meta-analytic review of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(4), 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Lima, G. M., Winsler, A., & Kitsantas, A. (2014). Ethnic and gender differences in first-year college students’ goal orientation, self-efficacy, and extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. The Journal of Educational Research, 107(5), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.823366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowson, M., McInerney, D. M., & Nelson, G. F. (2006). An investigation of the effects of school context and sex differences on students’ motivational goal orientations. Educational Psychology, 26(6), 781–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410600941920
   Google Scholar
• Eisenman, L., Chamberlin, M., & McGahee-Kovac, M. (2005). A Teacher Inquiry Group on Student-Led IEPs: Starting Small to Make a Difference. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 28(3-4), 195–206. 10.1177/088840640502800406
   Google Scholar
• Elias, S. M., & MacDonald, S. (2007). Using past performance, proxy efficacy, and academic self-efficacy to predict college performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(11), 2518–2531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00268.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erturan İlker, G., Arslan, Y., & Demirhan, G. (2014). A Validity and Reliability Study of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 10.12738/estp.2014.3.1871
   Google Scholar
• Erturan İlker, G., Arslan, Y., & Demirhan, G, Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University. (2014). A validity and reliability study of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(3), 821–833. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.3.1871
   Google Scholar
• Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 56–83. 10.1080/10705519909540119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington, C. A., Roderick, M., Allensworth, E., Nagaoka, J., Keyes, T. S., Johnson, D. W., & Beechum, N. O. (2012). Teaching adolescents to become learners: the role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance: A critical literature review. University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research.
   Google Scholar
• Fencl, H., & Scheel, K. (2005). Engaging students: An examination of the effects of teaching strategies on self-efficacy and course climate in a nonmajors physics course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 35(1), 20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, J. L. (2020). School-based practices for the 21st century: Noncognitive factors in student learning and psychosocial outcomes. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732219898703′
   Google Scholar
• Gabrieli, C., Ansel, D., & Krachman, S. B. (2015, December). Ready to be counted: The research case for education policy action on non-cognitive skills. Transforming Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED605379.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gutman, L. M., & Schoon, I. (2013, November 21). The impact of non-cognitive skills on outcomes for young people. Institute of Education, University of London. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10125763/1/Gutman_Schoon_ 2013 Non-cognitive_skills_literature_review_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. (2008). The innovation landscape for public service organizations. In J. Hartley, C. Donaldson, C. Skelcher, & M. Wallace (Eds.), Managing to improve public services (pp. 197–216). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 17(February), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C. (2013). Gender differences in academic self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0097-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indrasari, S. Y., & Takwin, B. (2019). Revisiting teachers’ innovative behavior: Indonesian context. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 9(4), 290–296.
   Google Scholar
• Jamil, N. A. (2018). Differences in student self-efficacy by gender. EDUCARE: International Journal for Educational Studies, 11(1), 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, O. (2003). Innovative behaviour and job involvement at the price of conflict and less satisfactory relations with co-workers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317903769647210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491–525. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johari, A. B., Wahat, N. W. A., & Zaremohzzabieh, Z. (2021). Innovative work behavior among teachers in malaysia: The effects of teamwork, principal support, and humor. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(2), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i2.13387
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 141–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9012-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A. (2020, June 5). Measuring model fit. https://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, G. G. (2017, March). The private schooling phenomenon in India: A review (No. 10612; IZA DP). IZA Institute of Labor Economics. https://www.iza.org/publications/dp/10612/the-private-schooling-phenomenon-in-india-a-review
   Google Scholar
• Klaeijsen, A., Vermeulen, M., & Martens, R. (2018). Teachers’ innovative behaviour: The importance of basic psychological need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, and occupational self-efficacy. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(5), 769–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1306803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothari, R. G., & Thomas, M. V. (2012). A study on implementation of Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation in upper primary schools of Kerala. MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends & Practices, 2(2), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1306803
   Google Scholar
• Koul, R., Roy, L., & Lerdpornkulrat, T. (2012). Motivational goal orientation, perceptions of biology and physics classroom learning environments, and gender. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9111-9
   Google Scholar
• Kuril, S. (2019). Change in leadership behaviour through online professional development programme: contextualising community-based identity cohesion and intentionality. [Doctoral dissertation, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad]. http://hdl.handle.net/11718/21527
   Google Scholar
• Lackaye, T. D., & Margalit, M. (2006). Comparisons of achievement, effort, and self-perceptions among students with learning disabilities and their peers from different achievement groups. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(5), 432–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390050501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambriex-Schmitz, P., Van der Klink, M. R., Beausaert, S., Bijker, M., & Segers, M. (2020a). Towards successful innovations in education: Development and validation of a multi-dimensional Innovative Work Behaviour Instrument. Vocations and Learning, 13(2), 313–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-020-09242-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambriex‐Schmitz, P., Van der Klink, M. R., Beausaert, S., Bijker, M., & Segers, M. (2020b). When innovation in education works: Stimulating teachers’ innovative work behaviour. International Journal of Training and Development, 24(2), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maun, D., Shukla, K. D., & Chand, V. S. (2020). Validating motivated strategies for learning questionnaire and invariance test across gender and caste groups in India. Cogent Education, 7(1), Article 1853303. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1853303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2017). Proactive employees: The relationship between work-related reflection and innovative work behaviour. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work, professional and practice-based learning (Vol. 20, pp. 141–159). Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60943-0
   Google Scholar
• Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., Houts, R., Poulton, R., Roberts, B. W., Ross, S., Sears, M. R., Thomson, W. M., Caspi, A., & Heckman, J. J. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(7), 2693–2698. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41002200 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010076108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandwani, B. (2016). Caste and class. Review of Market Integration, 8(3), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974929217706807
   Google Scholar
• NCERT. (2017). NAS 2017 National achievement survey class 3, 5 and 8: National report to inform policy, practice and teaching learning. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344781429_NAS_2017_National_Achievement_Survey_Class_3_5_and_8_National_Report_to_Inform_Policy_Practice_and_Teaching_Learning
   Google Scholar
• NCTE. (2009). National curriculum framework for teacher education: Towards preparing professional and humane teacher. https://www.ncte.gov.in/website/PDF/NCFTE_2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014). Measuring innovation in education: A new perspective. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264215696-en
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560390143085
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, B. C., Hisley, J., & Kempler, T. (2000). “What’s everybody so excited about?”: The effects of teacher enthusiasm on student intrinsic motivation and vitality. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68(3), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970009600093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation. (pp. 451–502). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, Ann Arbor, MI. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED338122.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Prat-Sala, M., & Redford, P. (2012). Writing essays: does self-efficacy matter? The relationship between self-efficacy in reading and in writing and undergraduate students’ performance in essay writing. Educational Psychology, 32(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2011.621411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, J., Glennie, E., Dalton, B., Lennon, J., & Bozick, R. (2010). Noncognitive skills in the classroom: New perspectives on educational research. Research Triangle Institute Press. https://doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2010.bk.0000.1009
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A., & Bruce, C. D. (2007). Teacher self-assessment: A mechanism for facilitating professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(2), 146–159. 10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, G., Mander, H., Thorat, S., Deshpande, S., & Baviskar, A. (2006). Untouchability in rural India. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Shukla, K. D., Kuril, S., & Chand, V. S. (2020). Does negative teacher behavior influence student self-efficacy and mastery goal orientation? Learning and Motivation, 71, 101653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2020.101653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankov, L., Morony, S., & Lee, Y. P. (2014). Confidence: The best non-cognitive predictor of academic achievement? Educational Psychology, 34(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.81419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. T. (2012). Review of the motivated strategy for learning questionnaire (mslq) using reliability generalization techniques assess scale reliability [Doctoral Dissertation, Auburn University]. https://etd.auburn.edu/bitstream/handle/10415/3114/Dissertation%20-%20TaylorRobin%202012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T., & Vermeulen, M. (2015). Toward a model of explaining teachers’ innovative behavior: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 85(3), 430–471. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314557949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckman, B. W., & Sexton, T. L. (1991). The effect of teacher encouragement on student self-efficacy and motivation for self-regulated performance. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6(1), 137–146.
   Google Scholar
• Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 751–796. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308321456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdés-Cuervo, A. A., Escobedo, P. A. S., & Valadez-Sierra, M. D. (2015). Gender differences in self-concept, locus of control, and goal orientation in Mexican high-achieving students. Gifted and Talented International, 30(1–2), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2015.1137451
   Google Scholar
• Van Dinther, M., Dochy, F., & Segers, M. (2011). Factors affecting students’ self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieluf, S., Kaplan, D., Klieme, E., & Bayer, S. (2012). Teaching practices and pedagogical innovations: Evidence from TALIS. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264123540-en
   Google Scholar
• Wentzel, K. R. (1996). Social and academic motivation in middle school: Concurrent and long-term relations to academic effort. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 16(4), 390–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431696016004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheaton, B., Muthén, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. F. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology, 8(1977), 84–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/270754
   Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. A., Pintrich, P. R., & Karabenick, S. A. (2005). Assessing academic self-regulated learning. In: K.A. Moore & L.H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 251–270). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23823-9_16
   Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. A., Yu, S. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). The relation between goal orientation and students’ motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8(3), 211–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90015-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2018). World development report 2018: Learning to realize education’s promise. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2018
   Google Scholar
• Youn, S., Chyung, Y., Moll, A. J., & Berg, S. A. (2010). The role of intrinsic goal orientation, self-efficacy, and e-learning practice in engineering education. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 10(1), 22–37.
   Google Scholar
• Zainal, M. A., & Matore, M. E. E. M. (2019). Factors influencing teachers’ innovative behaviour: A systematic review. Creative Education, 10(12), 2869–2886. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012213
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q. (2014). Assessing the effects of instructor enthusiasm on classroom engagement, learning goal orientation, and academic self-efficacy. Communication Teacher, 28(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2013.839047
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar