Publication Cover
Educational Psychology
An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology
Volume 43, 2023 - Issue 6
227
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Do epistemically more sophisticated students always learn better than epistemically less sophisticated students in a constructivist learning context?

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 583-603 | Received 06 Aug 2022, Accepted 24 Jul 2023, Published online: 02 Aug 2023

References

  • Bell, R. L., Matkins, J. J., & Gansneder, B. M. (2011). Impacts of contextual and explicit instruction on preservice elementary teachers’ understandings of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 414–436. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20402
  • Bell, T., Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., & Ploetzner, R. (2010). Collaborative inquiry learning: Models, tools, and challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 349–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802582241
  • Bereiter, C. (2016). The epistemology of science and the epistemology of science teaching. In C. K. Looi, J. L. Polman, U. Cress, & P. Reimann (Eds.), Transforming Learning, Empowering Learners: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 578–584). International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://www.isls.org/icls/2016/docs/ICLS2016_Volume_1_30June2016.pdf
  • Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2006). Effects of personal epistemology on the understanding of multiple texts. Reading Psychology, 27(5), 457–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710600848031
  • Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E., & Unger, C. (1989). An experiment is when you try it and see if it works: A study of grade 7 students’ understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 514–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110504
  • Cartiff, B. M., Duke, R. F., & Greene, J. A. (2021). The effect of epistemic cognition interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(3), 477–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000490
  • Chinn, C., & Sandoval, W. (2018). Epistemic cognition and epistemic development. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 24–33). Routledge.
  • Chuy, M., Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Prinsen, F., Resendes, M., Messina, R., Hunsburger, W., Teplovs, C., & Chow, A. (2010). Understanding the nature of science and scientific progress: A theory-building approach. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.21432/T2GP4R
  • Conley, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, I., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.004
  • Doyle, L., Brady, A. M., & Byrne, G. (2009). An overview of mixed methods research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 14(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871080939
  • Franco, G. M., Muis, K. R., Kendeou, P., Ranellucci, J., Sampasivam, L., & Wang, X. H. (2012). Examining the influences of epistemic beliefs and knowledge representations on cognitive processing and conceptual change when learning physics. Learning and Instruction, 22(1), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.06.003
  • Greene, J. A., Cartiff, B. M., & Duke, R. F. (2018). A meta-analytic review of the relationship between epistemic cognition and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(8), 1084–1111. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000263
  • Guo, J., Hu, X., Marsh, H. W., & Pekrun, R. (2022). Relations of epistemic beliefs with motivation, achievement, and aspirations in science: Generalizability across 72 societies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(4), 734–751. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000660
  • Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551–578. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10036
  • Kienhues, D., Bromme, R., & Stahl, E. (2008). Changing epistemological beliefs: The unexpected impact of a short-term intervention. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(Pt 4), 545–565. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709907X268589
  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034
  • Lee, E. Y. C., Chan, C. K. K., & Aalst, J. (2006). Students assessing their own collaborative knowledge building. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 57–87.
  • Lin, F. (2018). Characterizing elementary-school students’ epistemology of science: Science as collective theory-building process. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(6), 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0411-4
  • Lin, F., Chan, C. K. K., & van Aalst, J. (2014). Promoting 5th graders’ views of science and scientific inquiry in an epistemic-enriched knowledge-building environment. In J. L. Polman, E. A. Kyza, D. K. O'Neill, I. Tabak, W. R. Penuel, A. S. Jurow, K. O'Connor, T. Lee, & L. D'Amico (Eds.), Learning and Becoming in Practice: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) (Vol. 1, pp. 126–133). International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://www.isls.org/icls/2014/downloads/ICLS%202014%20Volume%201%20(PDF)-wCover.pdf
  • Lin, F., & Chan, C. K. K. (2018). Examining the role of computer-supported knowledge-building discourse in epistemic and conceptual understanding. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(5), 567–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12261
  • Louca, L., Elby, A., Hammer, D., & Kagey, T. (2004). Epistemological resources: Applying a new epistemological framework to science instruction. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3901_6
  • Mehler, D. M. A., Edelsbrunner, P. A., & Matić, K. (2019). Appreciating the significance of non-significant findings in psychology. Journal of European Psychology Students, 10(4), 1. https://doi.org/10.5334/e2019a
  • Narayan, R., Rodriguez, C., Araujo, J., Shaqlaih, A., & Moss, G. (2013). Constructivism—Constructivist learning theory. In B. J. Irby, G. Brown, R. Lara-Alecio, & S. Jackson (Eds.), The handbook of educational theories (pp. 169–183). Information Age Publishing.
  • Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Qian, G., & Alvermann, D. (1995). Role of epistemological beliefs and learned helplessness in secondary-school students learning science concepts from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.2.282
  • Sandoval, W. A. (2012). Situating episetemological development. In J. van Aalst, K. Thompson, M. J. Jacobson, & P. Reimann (Eds.), The Future of Learning: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 347–354). International Society of the Learning Sciences. Retrieved from https://repository.isls.org/bitstream/1/2225/1/347-354.pdf
  • Sandoval, W. A., & Morrison, K. (2003). High school students’ ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 369–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10081
  • Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Open Court.
  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2014). Knowledge building and knowledge creation: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 397–417). Cambridge University Press.
  • Schiefer, J., Edelsbrunner, P. A., Bernholt, A., Kampa, N., & Nehring, A. (2022). Epistemic beliefs in science – A systematic integration of evidence from multiple studies. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1541–1575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09661-w
  • Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498
  • Shaffer, D. W. (2018). Epistemic network analysis: Understanding learning by using big data for thick description. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 520–531). Routledge.
  • Songer, N. B., & Linn, M. C. (1991). How do students’ views of science influence knowledge integration. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 761–784. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280905
  • Stathopoulou, C., & Vosniadou, S. (2007). Exploring the relationship between physics-related epistemological beliefs and physics understanding. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 255–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.12.002
  • Windschitl, M., & Andre, T. (1998). Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: The roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199802)35:2<145::AID-TEA5 > 3.0.CO;2-S
  • Yerdelen-Damar, S., & Eryılmaz, A. (2021). Promoting conceptual understanding with explicit epistemic intervention in metacognitive instruction: Interaction between the treatment and epistemic cognition. Research in Science Education, 51(2), 547–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9807-7
  • Yin, R. K. (1992). The case study method as a tool for doing evaluation. Current Sociology, 40(1), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/001139292040001009
  • Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Lamon, M., Messina, R., & Reeve, R. (2007). Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9- and 10-year-olds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(2), 117–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9019-0
  • Zörgő, S., Swiecki, Z., & Ruis, A. R. (2021). Exploring the effects of segmentation on semi-structured interview data with epistemic network analysis. In A. R. Ruis & S. B. Lee (Eds.), Advances in Quantitative Ethnography: Second International Conference, ICQE 2021 (pp. 78–90). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67788-6_6

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.