Feedback and year level effects on university students’ self-efficacy and emotions during self-assessment: positive impact of rubrics vs. instructor feedback

References

• Andrade, H. (2018). Feedback in the context of self-assessment. In A. A. Lipnevich & J. K. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of instructional feedback (pp. 376–408). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2007). Student responses to criteria-referenced self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600801928
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. L., Wang, X., Du, Y., & Akawi, R. L. (2009). Rubric-referenced self-assessment and self-efficacy for writing. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.102.4.287-302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R., Taub, M., & Mudrick, N. V. (2018). Understanding and reasoning about real-time cognitive, affective, and metacognitive processes to foster self-regulation with advanced learning technologies. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 254–270). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, J. E., & Hixon, J. E. (1997). Effects of grade level and subject on student test score predictions. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(3), 170–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1997.10543773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D. (1995). Assessment and learning: contradictory or complementary? In P. Knight (Ed.), Assessment for learning in Higher Education (pp. 35–48). Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M., & Chen, F. (2015). The quality and effectiveness of descriptive rubrics. Educational Review, 67(3), 343–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2014.929565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., & Harris, L. R. (2013). Student self-assessment. In J. H. McMillan, (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 367–393). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2014). The future of self-assessment in classroom practice: Reframing self-assessment as a core competency. Frontline Learning Research, 3, 22–30. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i1.24
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065003245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau, P. Y. (1997). Reexamining a model for evaluating information center success using a structural equation modeling approach. Decision Sciences, 28(2), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01313.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer- and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079912331379935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (1989). Student self-assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59(4), 395–430. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543059004395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. (2018). Using self-assessment to improve student learning. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawthorne, K. A., Bol, L., & Pribesh, S. (2017). Can providing rubrics for writing tasks improve developing writers’ calibration accuracy? The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(4), 689–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.1299081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jax, J., Ahn, J. N., & Lin-Siegler, X. (2019). Using contrasting cases to improve self-assessment in physics learning. Educational Psychology, 39(6), 815–838. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1577360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenka, A. C., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Moshontz, H., Atkinson, K. M., Sanchez, C. E., & Cooper, H. (2021). A meta-analysis on the impact of grades and comments on academic motivation and achievement: A case for written feedback. Educational Psychology, 41(7), 922–947. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1659939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkmaz, S., Goksuluk, D., & Zararsiz, G. (2014). MVN: An R package for assessing multivariate normality. The R Journal, 6(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2014-031
   Google Scholar
• Kostons, D., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2009). How do I do? Investigating effects of expertise and performance‐process records on self‐assessment. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(9), 1256–1265. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostons, D., van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2010). Self-assessment and task selection in learner-controlled instruction: Differences between effective and ineffective learners. Computers & Education, 54(4), 932–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostons, D., van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2012). Training self-assessment and task-selection skills: A cognitive approach to improving selfregulated learning. Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 121–132.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipnevich, A. A., McCallen, L. N., Miles, K. P., & Smith, J. K. (2014). Mind the gap! Students’ use of exemplars and detailed rubrics as formative assessment. Instructional Science, 42(4), 539–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9299-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipnevich, A. A., & Panadero, E. (2021). A review of feedback models and theories: Descriptions, definitions, and conclusions. Frontiers in Education, 6, 720195. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.720195
   Google Scholar
• Lipnevich, A., Panadero, E., & Calistro, T. (2023). Unraveling the effects of rubrics and exemplars on student writing performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 29(1), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. (2021). The power of internal feedback: Exploiting natural comparison processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(5), 756–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1823314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (2008). Motivational role of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning. Theory, research and applications (pp. 111–168). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Huertas, J. A. (2012). Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 806–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Brown, G. T. L., & Strijbos, J. W. (2016). The future of student self-assessment: A review of known unknowns and potential directions. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 803–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Fernández-Ruiz, J., & Sánchez-Iglesias, I. (2020). Secondary education students’ self-assessment: the effects of feedback, subject matter, year level, and gender. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(6), 607–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1835823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., García-Pérez, D., Fernández-Ruiz, J., Fraile, J., Sánchez-Iglesias, I., & Brown, G. T. (2023). University students’ strategies and criteria during self-assessment: Instructor’s feedback, rubrics, and year level effects. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 38(3), 1031–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00639-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., & Lipnevich, A. (2022). A review of feedback models and typologies: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements. Educational Research Review, 35, 100416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Lipnevich, A. A., & Broadbent, J. (2019). Turning self-assessment into self-feedback. In D. Boud, M. D. Henderson, R. Ajjawi, & E. Molloy (Eds.), The impact of feedback in higher education: Improving assessment outcomes for learners (pp. 147–163). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Romero, M., & Strijbos, J. W. (2013). The impact of a rubric and friendship on peer assessment: Effects on construct validity, performance, and perceptions of fairness and comfort. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(4), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., & Romero, M. (2014). To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of selfassessment on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2013.877872
   Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., Muis, K. R., Frenzel, A. C., & Goetz, T. (2018). Emotions at school. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, E. R., Brown, G. T. L., & Jun, M. C. (2015). Achievement emotions in higher education: A diary study exploring emotions across an assessment event. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raaijmakers, S. F., Baars, M., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J. J., & van Gog, T. (2019). Effects of self-assessment feedback on self-assessment and task-selection accuracy. Metacognition and Learning, 14(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09189-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5–12 (BETA). Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitzmann, T., Ely, K., Brown, K. G., & Bauer, K. N. (2010). Self-assessment of knowledge: A cognitive learning or affective measure? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.9.2.zqr169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitzmann, T., & Johnson, S. K. (2012). When is ignorance bliss? The effects of inaccurate self-assessments of knowledge on learning and attrition. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 192–207. " https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, K. H. (2012). How teachers understand and use power in alternative assessment. Education Research International, 2012, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/382465
   Google Scholar
• Yan, Z. (2020). Self-assessment in the process of self-regulated learning and its relationship with academic achievement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1629390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, Z., & Brown, G. T. (2017). A cyclical self-assessment process: towards a model of how students engage in self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1247–1262. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1260091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, Z., Brown, G. T. L., Lee, J. C. K., & Qiu, X. L. (2020). Student self-assessment: Why do they do it? Educational Psychology, 40(4), 509–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1672038
   Google Scholar
• Yan, Z., Lao, H., Panadero, E., Fernández-Castilla, B., Yang, L., & Yang, M. (2022). Effects of self-assessment and peer-assessment interventions on academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 37, 100484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., Hepper, E. G., & Nash, R. A. (2021). Individual differences in self-reported use of assessment feedback: The mediating role of feedback beliefs. Educational Psychology, 41(7), 844–862. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1693510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2019). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar