![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
References
- Anthony G S, Walker R G, Cameron A D, et al. Transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage in the management of cervical incompetence. European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 1997; 72: 127–130
- Benson R C, Durfee R B. Transabdominal cervicouterine cerclage during pregnancy for the treatment of cervical incompetency. Obstetrics & Gynecology 1965; 25: 145–155
- Davis G, Berghella V, Talucci M, et al. Patients with prior failed transvaginal cerclage: a comparison of obstetric outcomes with either transabdominal or transvaginal cerclage. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000; 183: 836–839
- Gibb D M, Salaria D A. Transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage in the management of recurrent second-trimester miscarriage and preterm delivery. British Journal Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1995; 102: 802–806
- Johnston T A, Cameron A D. Atosiban for the primary prevention of preterm labour. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2001; 108: 886–887
- Ludmir J. Sonographic detection of cervical incompetence. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 1988; 31: 101–109
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Tocolytic drugs for women in preterm labour. RCOG, London 2002, Guideline No. 1B
- Valenzuela G J, Sanchez-Ramos L, Romero R, et al. Maintenance treatment of preterm labour with the oxytocin antagonist atosiban. The Atosiban PTL-098 Study Group. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000; 182: 1184–1190
- Worldwide Atosiban versus Beta-agonists Study Group. Effectiveness and safety of the oxytocin antagonist atosiban versus beta-adrenergic agonists in the treatment of preterm labour. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2001; 108: 133–142
- Zaveri V, Aghajafari F, Amankwah K, et al. Abdominal versus vaginal cerclage after a failed transvaginal cerclage: A systemic review. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2002; 187: 868–872