![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
References
- ACOG. ACOG practice bulletin: dystocia and augmentation of labour. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 2003; 85: 315–324
- Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte G ML. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Library Review 4 2006
- Gareen I F, Morenstern H, Greenland S, Gifford D S. Explaining the association of maternal age with Cesarean delivery for nulliparous and parous women. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2003; 56: 1100–1110
- Governmental Statistical Services. NHS Maternity Statistics, England 2004–05. HMSO, London 2006
- Graham W J, Hundley V, McCheyne A L, Hall M H, Gurney E, Milne J. An investigation of women's involvement in the decision to deliver by caesarean section. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1999; 106: 213–220
- Griffiths A N, Avasarala S, Wiener J J. A prospective observational study of emergency caesarean section rates and the effect of labour ward experience. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2005; 25: 666–668
- Hannah M E, Hannah W J, Hewson S A, Hodnett E D, Saigal S, Willian A R. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: A randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2000; 356: 1375–1383
- Health Canada. Health Services, Cesarean Section Rate. Canadian Perinatal Health Report 2000. Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa 2000
- Marx H, Wiener J, Davies N. A survey of the influence of patients' choice on the increase in the caesarean section rate. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2001; 21: 124–127
- National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Caesarean Section Clinical Guidance. RCOG Press, London 2004
- O'Driscoll K, Foley M, MacDonald D. Active management of labour as an alternative to caesarean section for dystocia. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1984; 63: 1544–1548
- Parrish K M, Holt V L, Easterling T R, Connell F A, LoGerfo J P. Effect of changes in maternal age, parity, and birth weight distribution on primary cesarean delivery rates. Journal of the American Medical Association 1994; 271: 443–447
- RCOG. The use of electronic fetal monitoring: The use and interpretation of cardiotocography in intrapartum fetal surveillance. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit, London 2001
- Thomas J, Paranjothy S. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. RCOG Press, London 2001
- Ventura S J, Martin J A, Curtin S C, Menacker F, Hamilton B E. Births: final data for 1999. National Vital Statistics Report 2001; 49: 1–74
- WHO (1985) WHO Regional Office for the Americas, Pan American Health Organisation. 1985. Recommendation of the Joint Interregional Conference on Appropriate Technology for Birth, FortalezaBrazil, 1985. World Health Organisation Regional Office for the Americas, Washington, DC
- Wilkinson C, McIlwaine G, Boulton-Jones C, Cole S. Is a rising caesarean section rate inevitable. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaeology 1998; 105: 45–52