Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Volume 37, 2017 - Issue 8
Submit an article Journal homepage
137
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Agreement of three interpretation systems of intrapartum foetal heart rate monitoring by different levels of physicians

Ninlapa PruksanusakDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, ThailandCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Putthaporn ThongphanangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, ThailandView further author information
,
Natthicha ChainarongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, ThailandView further author information
,
Thitima SuntharasajDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, ThailandView further author information
,
Ounjai Kor-anantakulDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, ThailandView further author information
,
Chitkasaem SuwanrathDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, ThailandView further author information
&
Chusana PetpichetchianDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, ThailandView further author information
 show all
Pages 996-999 | Published online: 09 Jun 2017

References

  • Ayres-de-Campos D, Spong CY, Chandraharan E. FIGO Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring Expert Consensus Panel. 2015. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography. International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 131:13–24.
  • Chauhan SP, Klauser CK, Woodring TC, Sanderson M, Magann EF, Morrison JC. 2008. Intrapartum nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing and prediction of adverse outcomes: interobserver variability. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 199:623.e1–625.
  • Coletta J, Murphy E, Rubeo Z, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. 2012. The 5-tier system of assessing fetal heart rate tracings is superior to the 3-tier system in identifying fetal acidemia. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 206:226.e1–225.
  • Freeman RK, Nageotte MP. 2010. Comments on American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice bulletin no.106. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 202:411–412.
  • Garite TJ, Dildy GA, McNamara H, Nageotte MP, Boehm FH, Dellinger EH, et al. 2000. A multicenter controlled trial of fetal pulse oximetry in the intrapartum management of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 183:1049–1058.
  • Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Grobman WA, Antoniewicz L, Hutchison M, Blackwell S. 2011. Assessment of the concordance among 2-tier, 3-tier, and 5-tier fetal heart rate classification systems. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 205:288.e1–284.
  • Kubli FW, Hon EH, Khazin AF, Takemura H. 1969. Observations on heart rate and pH in the human fetus during labor. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 104:1190–1206.
  • Landis JR, Koch GG. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174.
  • Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, Hauth J, Moore T. 2008. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstetrics & Gynecology 112:661–666.
  • Parer JT, Ikeda T. 2007. A framework for standardized management of intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 197:26.e1–26.
  • Ugwumadu A. 2014. Are we (mis)guided by current guidelines on intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring? Case for a more physiological approach to interpretation. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 121:1063–1070.
  • Vintzileos AM, Antsaklis A, Varvarigos I, Papas C, Sofatzis I, Montgomery JT. 1993. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation. Obstetrics & Gynecology 81:899–907.
  • Vintzileos AM, Nochimson DJ, Guzman ER, Knuppel RA, Lake M, Schifrin BS. 1995. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis. Obstetrics & Gynecology 85:149–155.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.