Induction of labour in term premature rupture of membranes; oxytocin versus sublingual misoprostol; a randomised clinical trial

References

• Abramovici D, Goldwasser S, Mabie BC, Mercer BM, Goldwasser R, Sibai BM. 1999. A randomized comparison of oral misoprostol versus Foley catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor at term. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 181:1108–1112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akyol D, Mungan T, Ünsal A, Yüksel K. 1999. Prelabour rupture of the membranes at term‐no advantage of delaying induction for 24 hours. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 39:291–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander JM, McIntire DM, Leveno KJ. 1999. Chorioamnionitis and the prognosis for term infants. Obstetrics and Gynecology 94:274–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Hussaini T, Abdel-Aal S, Youssef M. 2003. Oral misoprostol vs. intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 82:73–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butt KD, Bennett KA, Crane JM, Hutchens D, Young DC. 1999. Randomized comparison of oral misoprostol and oxytocin for labor induction in term prelabor membrane rupture. Obstetrics and Gynecology 94:994–999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughey A, Sundaram V, Kaimal AJ, Cheng YW, Gienger A, Little SE, et al. 2009. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment 176:1–257.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chung JH, Huang WH, Rumney PJ, Garite TJ, Nageotte MP. 2003. A prospective randomized controlled trial that compared misoprostol, Foley catheter, and combination misoprostol-Foley catheter for labor induction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 189:1031–1035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane JM, Young DC. 2003. Induction of labour with a favourable cervix and/or pre-labour rupture of membranes. Best Practice and Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 17:795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dällenbach P, Boulvain M, Viardot C, Irion O. 2003. Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 188:162–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dare M, Middleton P, Crowther C, Flenady V, Varatharaju B. 2006. Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews CD005302.
   Google Scholar
• Duff P. 1991. Management of premature rupture of membranes in term patients. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 34:723–729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff P, editor. 1996. Premature rupture of the membranes in term patients. Seminars in Perinatology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Flood B, Naeye RL. 1984. Factors that predispose to premature rupture of the fetal membranes. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing 13:119–122.
   Google Scholar
• Gerdes JS. 1991. Clinicopathologic approach to the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. Clinics in Perinatology 18:361–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagberg H, Wennerholm U-B, Sävman K. 2002. Sequelae of chorioamnionitis. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 15:301–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauth JC, Gilstrap IIILC, Hankins GD, Connor KD. 1985. Term maternal and neonatal complications of acute chorioamnionitis. Obstetrics and Gynecology 66:59–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. 2010. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews CD000941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann R, Anthony J, Fawcus S. 2001. Oral misoprostol vs. placebo in the management of prelabor rupture of membranes at term. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 72:215–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunt C, Kanat-Pektas M, Gungor AN, Kurt RK, Ozat M, Gulerman C, et al. 2010. Randomized trial of vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus oxytocin for labor induction in term premature rupture of membranes. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 49:57–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin MG, Nuthalapaty FS, Carver AR, et al. 2005. Misoprostol for labor induction in women with term premature rupture of membranes: a meta-analysis. Obstetrics and Gynecology 106:593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazhar SB, Imran R, Alam K. 2003. Trial of extra amniotic saline infusion with oxytocin versus prostaglandin E2 pessary for induction of labor. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons-Pakistan 13:317–320.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mozurkewich E, Horrocks J, Daley S, Von Oeyen P, Halvorson M, Johnson M, et al. 2003. The MisoPROM study: a multicenter randomized comparison of oral misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 189:1026–1030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetty A, Mackie L, Danielian P, Rice P, Templeton A. 2002. Sublingual compared with oral misoprostol in term labour induction: a randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 109:645–650.
   Google Scholar
• Silfeler DB, Tandogan B, Ayvaci H, Silfeler I, Yenidede I, Dayicioglu V. 2011. A comparison of misoprostol, controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert and oxytocin for cervical ripening. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 284:1331–1337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Fairclough A, Kavanagh J, Kelly AJ. 2014. Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014:CD003101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thulasimani M, Ramaswamy S. 2000. Comparison of oral misoprostol and oxytocin for labor induction. Obstetrics and Gynecology 95:786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing DA, Tran S, Paul RH. 2002. Factors affecting the likelihood of successful induction after intravaginal misoprostol application for cervical ripening and labor induction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 186:1237–1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SB, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. 2005. Sublingual misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized clinical trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology 105:365–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeteroğlu S, Engin-Ustün Y, Ustün Y, Güvercinçi M, Sahin G, Kamaci M. 2006. A prospective randomized study comparing misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term. Journal of Maternal Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 19:283–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar