Metasynthesis of educational strategies used to promote prenatal health

References

• Amolo L, Irimu G, Njai D. 2017. Knowledge of postnatal mothers on essential newborn care practices at the Kenyatta National Hospital: a cross sectional study. Pan African Medical Journal 28:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artieta-Pinedo I, Paz-Pascual C, Grandes G, Espinosa M. 2017. Framework for the establishment of a feasible, tailored and effective perinatal education programme. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 17:58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berbel NAN. 2011. Active methodologies and the nurturing of students’ autonomy. Semina: Ciências Sociais e Humanas 32:25–40.
   Google Scholar
• Camillo BS, Nietsche EA, Salbego C, Cassenote LG, Osto DSD, Böck A. 2016. Health education actions in primary attention to pregnant and puerperal women: integrative review. Journal of Nursing UFPE on Line 10:4894–4901.
   Google Scholar
• Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). 2018. CASP (CASP Checklist: 10 questionsto help you make sense of a Qualitative research) [online]. Available from: https://casp-uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/CASP-Qualitative-Checklist-2018_fillable_form.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Delbaere I, Mokangi P, Roelens K, Sutter AD, Gellynck X, Beeckman D, et al. 2016. Systematic development of an evidence-based website on preconception care. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences 121:264–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte SJH, Borges AP, Arruda GL. 2011. Nursing actions in health education in prenatal care: an experience report of an extension project of the federal university of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Revista de enfermagem do Centro-Oeste Mineiro 1:277–282.
   Google Scholar
• Fagundes DQ, Oliveira AE. 2016. Prenatal health education from the theoretical framework of Paulo Freire. Trabalho Educação e Saúde 15:223–243.
   Google Scholar
• Guerreiro EM, Rodrigues DP, Queiroz ABA, Ferreira MA. 2014. [Health education in pregnancy and postpartum: meanings attributed by puerperal women]. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem 67:13–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gomes IS, Caminha IO. 2014. Guia para estudos de revisão sistemática: uma opção metodológica para as Ciências do Movimento Humano. Movimento 20:395–411.
   Google Scholar
• Hundt GL, Bryanston C, Lowe P, Cross S, Sandall J, Spencer K. 2011. Inside inside view: reflections on stimulating debate and engagement through a multimedia live theatre production on the dilemmas and issues of pre-natal screening policy and practice. Health Expectations 14:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kominiarek MA, Gay F, Peacock N. 2015. Obesity in pregnancy: a qualitative approach to inform na intervention for patients and providers. Maternal and Child Health Journal 19:1698–1712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraschnewski JL, Chuang CH, Poole ES, Peyton T, Blubaugh I, Pauli J, et al. 2014. Paging ‘Dr. Google’: does technology fill the gap created by the prenatal care visit structure? Qualitative focus group study with pregnant women. Journal of Medical Internet Research 16:e147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinelli KG, Santos ETN, Gama SGN, Oliveira AE. 2014. Process of prenatal care according to the criteria of Humanizing of Prenatal Care and Childbirth Program and Stork Network. Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia 36:56–64.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald SD, Sword W, Eryuzlu LE, Biringer AB. 2014. A qualitative descriptive study of the group, prenatal care experience: perceptions of women with low-risk pregnancies and their midwives. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 14:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes JT, Gomes KRO, Rodrigues MTP, Mascarenhas MDM. 2016. Quality of prenatal care in Brazil: review of published papers from 2005 to 2015. Cadernos Saúde Coletiva 24:252–261.
   Google Scholar
• Reberte LM, Hoga LAK, Gomes ALZ. 2012. Process of construction of an educational booklet for health promotion of pregnant women. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem 20(1):1–8. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rlae/v20n1/pt_14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reberte LM, Hoga LAK. 2010. The experience of fathers participants of health education group in prenatal care. Ciencia y EnfermerIa 16:105–114.
   Google Scholar
• Rolim MOR, Moreira TMM, Viana GRO. 2006. Course for pregnant mothers: educational action from co-responsibility. Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing 5(3):1–6. Avaliable from: http://www.objnursing.uff.br/index.php/nursing/article/view/595/140
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M, Trimble F, Woodard EK, Barroso J. 2006. From synthesis to script: Transforming qualitative research findings for use in practice. Qualitative Health Research 16:1350–1370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos DS, Andrade ALA, Lima BSS, Silva YN. 2012. The Prenatal care waiting room as a setting for health education. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica 36:62–67.
   Google Scholar
• Serçekuş P, Mete S. 2010. Turkish women’s perceptions of antenatal education. International Nursing Review 57:395–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual. 2014. Methodology for JBI Umbrella Reviews; 2014; p.1–34. Avaliable from: http://joannabriggs.org/assets/docs/sumari/ReviewersManual-Methodology-JBI_Umbrella%20Reviews-2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Viellas EF, Domingues RMSM, Dias MAB, Gama SGN, Theme Filha MM, Costa JV, et al. 2015. Assistência pré-natal no Brasil. Cad Saude Publica [Internet]. 2014 [acesso em: 02 abr. 2018];30(Supl. 1):S85–100. Disponível em:http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00126013
   Google Scholar
• Wild CF, Silveira A, Favero NB, Gueterres EC, Rosa EO. 2015. Educational activities carried out in the group of pregnant users of basic attention. Rev Enferm UFPE on Line 9:9633–9637.
   Google Scholar