Hysteropexy with single-incision vaginal support system associated with a modified culdoplasty for enterocele prevention

References

• Altman D, Mikkola TS, Bek KM, Rahkola-Soisalo P, Gunnarsson J, Engh ME, et al. 2016. Pelvic organ prolapse repair using the Uphold™ Vaginal Support System: a 1-year multicenter study. International Urogynecology Journal 27:1337–1345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P. 2004. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourology and Urodynamics 23:322–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brummen HJ, van de Pol G, Aalders CIM, Heintz APM, van der Vaart CH. 2003. Sacrospinous hysteropexy compared to vaginal hysterectomy as primary surgical treatment for a descensus uteri: effect on urinary symptoms. International Urogynecology Journal 14:350–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapple CR, Cruz F, Deffieux X, Milani AL, Arlandis S, Artibani W, et al. 2017. Consensus statement of the European Urology Association and the European Urogynaecological Association on the use of implanted materials for treating pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. European Urology 72:424–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira SA, Fonseca MCM, Bortolini MAT, Girão M, Roque MT, Castro RA. 2017. Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis. International Urogynecology Journal 28:1617–1630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Tayrac R, Sentilhes L. 2013. Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery and methods of prevention. International Urogynecology Journal 24:1859–1872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB, et al. 2015. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.) 351:h3717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz V, van der Vaart CH, van der Graaf Y, Heintz P, Schraffordt Koops SE. 2010. One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study. International Urogynecology Journal 21:209–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. 2004. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Annals of Surgery 240:205–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilber KS, Alperin M, Khan A, Wu N, Pashos CL, Clemens JQ, et al. 2013. Outcomes of vaginal prolapse surgery among female medicare beneficiaries: the role of apical support. Obstetrics and Gynecology 122:981–987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FDA. 2011. Urogynecologic surgical mesh: update on the safety and effectiveness of transvaginal placement for pelvic organ prolapse; [cited 2018 Aug 8]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/UCM262760.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Glazener CM, Breeman S, Elders A, Hemming C, Cooper KG, Freeman RM, et al. 2017. Mesh, graft, or standard repair for women having primary transvaginal anterior or posterior compartment prolapse surgery: two parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled trials (PROSPECT). Lancet (London, England) 389:381–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefni MA, El-Toukhy TA, Bhaumik J, Katsimanis E. 2003. Sacrospinous cervicocolpopexy with uterine conservation for uterovaginal prolapse in elderly women: an evolving concept. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 188:645–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasturi S, Diaz SI, McDermott CD, Woodman PJ, Bump RC, Terry CL, et al. 2011. De novo stress urinary incontinence after negative prolapse reduction stress testing for total vaginal mesh procedures: incidence and risk factors. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 205:487.e1–487.e4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan ZA, Thomas L, Emery SJ. 2014. Outcomes and complications of trans-vaginal mesh repair using the Prolift kit for pelvic organ prolapse at 4 years median follow-up in a tertiary referral centre. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 290:1155–11577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowder JL, Park AJ, Ellison R, Ghetti C, Moalli P, Zyczynski H, Weber AM. 2008. The role of apical vaginal support in the appearance of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse. Obstetrics and Gynecology 111:152–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo J, Chen L, Fenner DE, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. 2015. A multi-compartment 3-D finite element model of rectocele and its interaction with cystocele. Journal of Biomechanics 48:1580–1586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher C, Cary MP, Slack MC, Murray CJ, Milligan M, Schluter P. 2001. Uterine preservation or hysterectomy at sacrospinous colpopexy for uterovaginal prolapse? International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction 12:381–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Marjoribanks J. 2016. Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2:CD012079.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. 2013. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 4:CD004014.
   Google Scholar
• Ostegard DR. 2010. Polypropylene vaginal mesh grafts in gynecology. Obstetrics & Gynecology 116:962–966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L. 2010. Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse. International Urogynecology Journal 21:523–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanford EJ, Moore RD, Roovers J-PWR, Courtieu C, Lukban JC, Bataller E, et al. 2013. Elevate anterior/apical: 12-month data showing safety and efficacy in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery 19:79–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toozs-Hobson P, Freeman R, Barber M, Maher C, Haylen B, Athanasiou S, et al. 2012. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for reporting outcomes of surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. International Urogynecology Journal 23:527–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Ploeg JM, van der Steen A, Oude Rengerink K, van der Vaart CH, Roovers JP. 2014. Prolapse surgery with or without stress incontinence surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BJOG : an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 121:537–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withagen MI, Milani AL, de Leeuw JW, Vierhout ME. 2012. Development of de novo prolapse in untreated vaginal compartments after prolapse repair with and without mesh: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. BJOG : an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 119:354–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar