![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1944-4862
References
- Ahonkallio S, Santala M, Valtonen H, Martikainen H. 2012. Cost-minimisation analysis of endometrial thermal ablation in a day case or outpatient setting under different anaesthesia regimens. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 162:102–104.
- Bhattacharya S, Middleton L, Tsourapas A, Lee A, Champaneria R, Daniels J, et al. 2011. Hysterectomy, endometrial ablation and Mirena® for heavy menstrual bleeding: a systematic review of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technology Assessment 15:iii–xvi.
- Cooper K, Parkin D, Garratt A, Grant A. 1997. A randomised comparison of medical and hysteroscopic management in women consulting a gynaecologist for treatment of heavy menstrual loss. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 104:1360–1366.
- Farrugia M, Hussain SY. 2006. Hysteroscopic endometrial ablation using the Hydro ThermAblator in an outpatient hysteroscopy clinic: feasibility and acceptability. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 13:178–182.
- Hawe J, Abbott J, Hunter D, Phillips G, Garry R. 2003. A randomised controlled trial comparing the Cavaterm endometrial ablation system with the Nd:YAG laser for the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 110:350–357.
- Jack SA, Cooper KG, Seymour J, Graham W, Fitzmaurice A, Perez J. 2005. A randomised controlled trial of microwave endometrial ablation without endometrial preparation in the outpatient setting: patient acceptability, treatment outcome and costs. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 112:1109–1116.
- Klebanoff J, Patel N, Sloan N. 2018. Utility of anesthetic block for endometrial ablation pain: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 218:225.e1–225.e11.
- Marsh F, Bekker H, Duffy S. 2007. A survey of women’s views of Thermachoice endometrial ablation in the outpatient versus day case setting. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 115:31–37.
- Marsh F, Thewlis J, Duffy S. 2007. Randomized controlled trial comparing Thermachoice III* in the outpatient versus daycase setting. Fertility and Sterility 87:642–650.
- Penninx J, Herman M, Kruitwagen R, Ter Haar A, Mol B, Bongers M. 2016. Bipolar versus balloon endometrial ablation in the office: a randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 196:52–56.
- Reinders I, Geomini P, Timmermans A, de Lange M, Bongers M. 2016. Local anaesthesia during endometrial ablation: a systematic review. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 124:190–199.
- Samuel N, Karragianniadou E, Clark T. 2009. Outpatient versus day-case endometrial ablation using the NovaSure™ impedance-controlled ablative system. Gynecological Surgery 6:3–9.
- Sjoeen G, Falk R, Hauge T, Langesaeter E. 2019. Haemodynamic stability after paracervical block: a randomized, controlled, double-blind study comparing bupivacaine-adrenaline with bupivacaine. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 63:373–380.