Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Volume 41, 2021 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
322
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles: Obstetrics

Explanatory variables and nomogram of a clinical prediction model to estimate the risk of caesarean section after term induction

Muhammed Hanifi Bademkirana Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Health Sciences University Gaziyaşargil Education and Research Hospital, Diyarbakır, TurkeyCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9350-582X
ORCID Icon,
Cihan Bademkirana Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Health Sciences University Gaziyaşargil Education and Research Hospital, Diyarbakır, TurkeyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1791-7523
ORCID Icon,
Serhat Egea Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Health Sciences University Gaziyaşargil Education and Research Hospital, Diyarbakır, TurkeyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5430-602X
ORCID Icon,
Nurullah Pekera Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Health Sciences University Gaziyaşargil Education and Research Hospital, Diyarbakır, TurkeyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3285-9990
ORCID Icon,
Seyhun Sucub Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gaziantep University Medical School, Diyarbakır, TurkeyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6821-4070
ORCID Icon,
Mehmet Obuta Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Health Sciences University Gaziyaşargil Education and Research Hospital, Diyarbakır, TurkeyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6925-4784
ORCID Icon,
Mehmet Ozgur Demirela Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Health Sciences University Gaziyaşargil Education and Research Hospital, Diyarbakır, TurkeyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0888-3779
ORCID Icon,
Serhat Samancic Department of Pediatric Disease, Diyarbakır Pediatric Hospital, Diyarbakır, TurkeyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9385-132X
ORCID Icon,
Ihsan Baglia Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Health Sciences University Gaziyaşargil Education and Research Hospital, Diyarbakır, TurkeyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3195-9164
ORCID Icon &
Kiymet Celikd Department of Neonatology, Health Sciences University Gaziyaşargil Education and Research Hospital, Diyarbakır, TurkeyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4522-6885
ORCID Icon show all
Pages 367-373 | Published online: 15 Oct 2020

References

  • ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins – Obstetrics. 2009. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: induction of labor. Obstetrics and Gynecology 114:386–397.
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 2009. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstetrics and Gynecology 114:192–202.
  • Ashwal E, Hadar E, Chen R, Aviram A, Hiersch L, Gabbay-Benziv R. 2017. Effect of fetal gender on induction of labor failure rates. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 30:3009–3013.
  • Bakker R, Pierce S, Myers D. 2017. The role of prostaglandins E1 and E2, dinoprostone, and misoprostol in cervical ripening and the induction of labor: a mechanistic approach. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 296:167–179.
  • Beckwith L, Magner K, Kritzer S, Warshak CR. 2017. Prostaglandin versus mechanical dilation and the effect of maternal obesity on failure to achieve active labor: a cohort study. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 30:1621–1626.
  • Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Glickman H, Bar J, Kaplan B, Hod M. 2004. Mode of delivery in pregnancies with premature rupture of membranes at or before term following induction of labor with vaginal prostaglandin E2. American Journal of Perinatology 21:263–268.
  • Crane JMG. 2006. Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 49:573–584.
  • Ennen CS, Bofill JA, Magann EF, Bass JD, Chauhan SP, Morrison JC. 2009. Risk factors for cesarean delivery in preterm, term and post-term patients undergoing induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 67:113–117.
  • Grobman WA. 2012. Predictors of induction success. Seminars in Perinatology 36:344–347.
  • Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Mallett G, et al.; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network. 2018. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. The New England Journal of Medicine 379:513–523.
  • Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark DB. 2005. Prognostic/clinical prediction models: multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. In: D'Agostino Sr RB, editor. Tutorials in biostatistics. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons. p. 223–249.
  • Levine LD, Downes KL, Parry S, Elovitz MA, Sammel MD, Srinivas SK. 2018. A validated calculator to estimate risk of cesarean after an induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 218:254.e1–e7.
  • Migliorelli F, Baños N, Angeles MA, Rueda C, Salazar L, Gratacós E, Palacio M. 2019. Clinical and sonographic model to predict cesarean delivery after induction of labor at term. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 46:88–96.
  • NICE. 2008. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Induction of labour. London (UK): RCOG Press.
  • Schuit E, Kwee A, Westerhuis MEMH, Van Dessel HJHM, Graziosi GCM, Van Lith JMM, et al. 2012. A clinical prediction model to assess the risk of operative delivery. BJOG : An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 119:915–923.
  • Smith CV, Rayburn WF, Miller AM. 1994. Intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and initiation of labor. Comparison of a multidose gel and single, controlled-release pessary. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine 39:381–384.
  • Tenore JL. 2003. Methods for cervical ripening and induction of labor. American Family Physician 67:2123–2128.
  • Tolcher MC, Holbert MR, Weaver AL, McGree ME, Olson JE, El-Nashar SA, et al. 2015. Predicting cesarean delivery after induction of labor among nulliparous women at term. Obstet Gynecol 126:1059–1068.
  • Torricelli M, Voltolini C, Vellucci FL, Conti N, Bocchi C, Severi FM, et al. 2013. Fetal gender effects on induction of labor in postdate pregnancies. Reproductive Sciences 20:670–674.
  • Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Sciscione AC, Hoffman MK. 2005. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstetrics & Gynecology 105:698–704.
  • WHO. 2011. WHO recommendations for induction of labour. World Health Organization.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.