![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7660-6864
References
- Fernández‐Montolí ME, Tous S, Medina G, Castellarnau M, García‐Tejedor A, de Sanjosé S. 2020. Long‐term predictors of residual or recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2–3 after treatment with a large loop excision of the transformation zone: a retrospective study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 127:377–387.
- Heffner LJ. 2004. Advanced maternal age-how old is too old? The New England Journal of Medicine 351:1927–1929.
- Indraccolo U, Santi E, Iannone P, Borghi C, Greco P. 2021. Number of colposcopic cervical biopsies and diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a prospective study. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology 42:649–654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ejgo4204100.
- Kawano K, Tsuda N, Nishio S, Yonemoto K, Tasaki K, Tasaki R, et al. 2016. Identification of appropriate cone length to avoid positive cone margin in high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Identification of appropriate cone length to avoid positive cone margin in high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 27:e54.
- Kolben TM, Etzel LT, Bergauer F, Hagemann I, Hillemanns P, Repper M, et al. 2019. A randomized trial comparing limited-excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) in cervical dysplasia patients. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 30:e42.
- NHS Cervical Screening Program [Internet]. London (UK): PHE Screening; March 2016 [cited 4 January, 2020]. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/515817/NHSCSP_colposcopy_management.pdf.
- Papoutsis D, Rodolakis A, Mesogitis S, Sotiropoulou M, Antsaklis A. 2013. Appropriate cone dimensions to achieve negative excision margins after large loop excision of transformation zone in the uterine cervix for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 75:163–168.
- Sydsjö G, Lindell Pettersson M, Bladh M, Skoog Svanberg A, Lampic C, Nedstrand E. 2019. Evaluation of risk factors’ importance on adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in women aged 40 years or older. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 19:92
- Tainio K, Athanasiou A, Tikkinen KAO, Aaltonen R, Cárdenas JH, Glazer-Livson S, et al. 2018. Clinical course of untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 under active surveillance: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 360:k499.
- Velentzis LS, Smith MA, Simms KT, Lew JB, Hall M, Hughes S, et al. 2019. Pathways to a cancer-free future: a protocol for modelled evaluations to maximize the future impact of interventions on cervical cancer in Australia. Gynecologic Oncology 152:465–471.