Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse in the elderly: safety and outcomes

References

• Barber MD. 2016. Pelvic organ prolapse. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.) 354:i3853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudy AS, Thubert T, Vinchant M, Hermieu JF, Villefranque V, Deffieux X. 2016. Outcomes of laparoscopic sacropexy in women over 70: a comparative study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 207:178–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, et al. 1996. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 175:10–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. 1987. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. Journal of Chronic Diseases 40:373–383.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chaudhry Z, Cohen SA, Tarnay C. 2016. National assessment of advancing age on perioperative morbidity and length of stay associated with minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery 22:482–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coolen ALW, van Oudheusden AM, van Eijndhoven HW, van der Heijden TP, Stokmans RA, Mol BWJ, Bongers MY. 2013. A comparison of complications between open abdominal sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vault prolapse. Obstetrics and Gynecology International 2013:528636. 2013.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costantini E, Brubaker L, Cervigni M, Matthews CA, O'Reilly BA, Rizk D, et al. 2016. Sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: evidence-based review and recommendations. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 205:60–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. 2004. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Annals of Surgery 240:205–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman RM, Pantazis K, Thomson A, Frappell J, Bombieri L, Moran P, et al. 2013. A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. International Urogynecology Journal 24:377–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghezzi F, Uccella S, Cromi A, Bogani G, Candeloro I, Serati M, Bolis P. 2011. Surgical treatment for pelvic floor disorders in women 75 years or older: a single-center experience. Menopause (New York, N.Y.) 18:314–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer JA, Harvie HS, Andy UU, Smith AL, Northington GM, Arya LA. 2015. Short-term postoperative functional outcomes in older women undergoing prolapse surgery. Obstetrics & Gynecology 125:551–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haylen BT, De Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al., International Continence Society. 2010. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourology and Urodynamics 29:4–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman LC, Tran MC, Davidson ERW, Walters MD, Ferrando CA. 2020. Pelvic organ prolapse recurrence in young women undergoing vaginal and abdominal colpopexy. International Urogynecology Journal 31:2661–2667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanda Y. 2013. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplantation 48:452–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King SW, Jefferis H, Jackson S, Marfin AG, Price N. 2017. Laparoscopic uterovaginal prolapse surgery in the elderly: feasibility and outcomes. Gynecological Surgery 14:2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körnig M, Brühlmann E, Günthert A, Christmann C. 2018. Intra-, peri- and postoperative complications in pelvic organ prolapse surgery in geriatric women. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 224:142–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenstein E, Moller LA, Laigaard J, Gimbel H. 2018. Reoperation for pelvic organ prolapse: a Danish cohort study with 15-20 years’ follow-up. Int Urogynecol J 29:119–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher CM, Feiner B, Baessler K, Glazener CM. 2011. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review. International Urogynecology Journal 22:1445–1457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narins H, Danforth TL. 2016. Management of pelvic organ prolapse in the elderly – is there a role for robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy? Robotic Surgery (Auckland) 3:65–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ouchi Y, Rakugi H, Arai H, Akishita M, Ito H, Toba K, Kai I, Joint Committee of Japan Gerontological Society (JGLS) and Japan Geriatrics Society (JGS) on the definition and classification of the elderly. 2017. Redefining the elderly as aged 75 years and older: Proposal from the Joint Committee of Japan Gerontological Society and the Japan Geriatrics Society. Geriatrics & Gerontology International 17:1045–1047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizarro-Berdichevsky J, Clifton MM, Goldman HB. 2015. Evaluation and management of pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine 31:507–521.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson BL, Parnell BA, Sandbulte JT, Geller EJ, Connolly A, Matthews CA. 2013. Robotic versus vaginal urogynecologic surgery: a retrospective cohort study of perioperative complications in elderly women. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery 19:230–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slopnick EA, Petrikovets A, Sheyn D, Kim SP, Nguyen CT, Hijaz AK. 2019. Surgical trends and patient factors associated with the treatment of apical pelvic organ prolapse from a national sample. International Urogynecology Journal 30:603–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepp KJ, Barber MD, Yoo EH, Whiteside JL, Paraiso MFR, Walters MD. 2005. Incidence of perioperative complications of urogynecologic surgery in elderly women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 192:1630–1636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung VW, Weitzen S, Sokol ER, Rardin CR, Myers DL. 2006. Effect of patient age on increasing morbidity and mortality following urogynecologic surgery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 194:1411–1417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibi B, Vincens E, Durand M, Bentellis I, Salet-Lizee D, Kane A, et al. 2019. Comparison of different surgical techniques for pelvic floor repair in elderly women: a multi-institutional study. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 299:1007–1013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner LC, Kantartzis K, Lowder JL, Shepherd JP. 2014. The effect of age on complications in women undergoing minimally invasive sacral colpopexy. International Urogynecology Journal 25:1251–1256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu JM, Kawasaki A, Hundley AF, Dieter AA, Myers ER, Sung VW. 2011. Predicting the number of women who will undergo incontinence and prolapse surgery, 2010 to 2050. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 205:230-e1–230.e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Funk MJ. 2014. Lifetime risk of stress incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstetrics and Gynecology 123:1201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar