Current perspectives on social oocyte freezing

References

• Antinori M, Licata E, Dani G, Cerusico F, Versaci C, Antinori S, et al. 2007. Cryotop vitrification of human oocytes results in high survival rate and healthy deliveries. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 14:72–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyle C, Harper JC, Davies MC. 2016. Oocyte cryopreservation: where are we now? Human Reproduction Update 22:440–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASRM. 2013. Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline. American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Fertility and Sterility 99:37–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASRM. 2018. Planned oocyte cryopreservation for women seeking to preserve future reproductive potential: an Ethics Committee opinion. American Society for Reproductive Medicine: Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility and Sterility 110:1022–1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin K. 2018. Conceptualising women's motivations for social egg freezing and experience of reproductive delay. Sociology of Health and Illness 40:859–873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin K, Culley L, Hudson N, Mitchell H, Lavery S. 2015. Oocyte cryopreservation for social reasons: demographic profile and disposal intentions of UK users. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 31:239–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin K, Culley L. 2018. Women's experience of social egg freezing: perceptions of success, risks, and 'going it alone'. Human Fertility (Fertility) 23:186–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belluck P. 2018. What fertility patients should know about egg freezing. The New York Times; [cited 2020 9 Jan]. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/13/health/eggs-freezing-storage-safety.html
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Rafael Z. 2018. The dilemma of social oocyte freezing: usage rate is too low to make it cost-effective. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 37:443–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai L-B, Qian X-Q, Wang W, Mao Y-D, Yan Z-J, Liu C-Z, et al. 2012. Oocyte vitrification technology has made egg-sharing donation easier in China. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 24:186–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Fertility Andrology Society (CFAS). (2016). ART live birth rates – media releases: oocyte banking for social reasons; [cited 2019 Dec 6]. Available from: https://cfas.ca/canadian-art-register.html
   Google Scholar
• Cha A.E. (2018). Egg-freezing regrets: half of women who undergo the procedure have some remorse. The Washington post; [cited 2020 May 16]. Available from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2018/05/18/egg-freezing-regrets-half-of-women-who-undergo-the-procedure-have-some-remorse/
   Google Scholar
• Chang C-C, Elliott TA, Wright G, Shapiro DB, Toledo AA, Nagy ZP, et al. 2013. Prospective controlled study to evaluate laboratory and clinical outcomes of oocyte vitrification obtained in in vitro fertilization patients aged 30 to 39 years. Fertility and Sterility 99:1891–1897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C. 1986. Pregnancy after human oocyte cryopreservation. The Lancet 327:884–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cil AP, Seli E. 2013. Current trends and progress in clinical applications of oocyte cryopreservation. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 25:247–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobo A, García-Velasco JA, Coello A, Domingo J, Pellicer A, Remohí J. 2016. Oocyte vitrification as an efficient option for elective fertility preservation. Fertility and Sterility 105:755–764, e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobo A, García-Velasco J, Domingo J, Pellicer A, Remohí J. 2018. Elective and onco-fertility preservation: factors related to IVF outcomes. Human Reproduction 33:2222–2231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford NM, Steiner AZ. 2015. Age-related infertility. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 42:15–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot M, Dancet E, Repping S, Goddijn M, Stoop D, van der Veen F, Gerrits T. 2016. Perceptions of oocyte banking from women intending to circumvent age-related fertility decline. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 95:1396–1401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine K, Mumford SL, Goldman KN, Hodes-Wertz B, Druckenmiller S, Propst AM, Noyes N. 2015. Baby budgeting: oocyte cryopreservation in women delaying reproduction can reduce cost per live birth. Fertility and Sterility 103:1446–1453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dondorp W, de Wert G, Pennings G, Shenfield F, Devroey P, Tarlatzis B, et al. 2012. Oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility loss. Human Reproduction 27:1231–1237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle JO, Richter KS, Lim J, Stillman RJ, Graham JR, Tucker MJ, et al. 2016. Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval. Fertility and Sterility 105:459–466.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunson D, Baird DD, Colombo B. 2004. Increased infertility with age in men and women. Obstetrics and Gynecology 103:51–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efrati I. 2018. Motherhood on ice: sharp rise in women freezing eggs for the future. Haaretz: Israel news; [cited 2019 Oct 31]. Available from: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/motherhood-on-ice-sharp-rise-in-women-freezing-eggs-for-the-future-1.5791047
   Google Scholar
• Esfandiari N, Litzky J, Sayler J, Zagadailov P, George K, DeMars L, et al. 2019. Egg freezing for fertility preservation and family planning: a nationwide survey of US Obstetrics and Gynecology residents. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 17:16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law. 2012. Oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility loss. Human Reproduction 27:1231–1237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faddy MJ, Gosden RG, Gougeon A, Richardson SJ, Nelson JF. 1992. Accelerated disappearance of ovarian follicles in mid-life: implications for forecasting menopause. Human Reproduction 7:1342–1346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fertility IQ. 2018. The cost of egg freezing; [cited 2020 Jan 9]. Available from: https://www.fertilityiq.com/egg-freezing/the-costs-of-egg-freezing
   Google Scholar
• García D, Vassena R, Prat A, Vernaeve V. 2017. Poor knowledge of age-related fertility decline and assisted reproduction among healthcare professionals. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 34:32–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Velasco JA, Domingo J, Cobo A, Martínez M, Carmona L, Pellicer A, et al. 2013. Five years' experience using oocyte vitrification to preserve fertility for medical and nonmedical indications. Fertility and Sterility 99:1994–1999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman KN, Noyes NL, Knopman JM, McCaffrey C, Grifo JA. 2013. Oocyte efficiency: does live birth rate differ when analyzing cryopreserved and fresh oocytes on a per-oocyte basis? Fertility and Sterility 100:712–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman RH, Racowsky C, Farland LV, Munné S, Ribustello L, Fox JH, et al. 2017. Predicting the likelihood of live birth for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a counseling tool for physicians and patients. Human Reproduction 32:853–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood EA, Pasch LA, Hastie J, Cedars MI, Huddleston HG. 2018. To freeze or not to freeze: decision regret and satisfaction following elective oocyte cryopreservation. Fertility and Sterility 109:1097–1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammarberg K, Kirkman M, Pritchard N, Hickey M, Peate M, McBain J, et al. 2017. Reproductive experiences of women who cryopreserved oocytes for non-medical reasons. Human Reproduction 32:575–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirshfeld-Cytron J, Grobman WA, Milad MP. 2012. Fertility preservation for social indications: a cost-based decision analysis. Fertility and Sterility 97:665–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho JR, Woo I, Louie K, Salem W, Jabara SI, Bendikson KA, et al. 2017. A comparison of live birth rates and perinatal outcomes between cryopreserved oocytes and cryopreserved embryos. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 34:1359–1366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodes-Wertz B, Druckenmiller S, Smith M, Noyes N. 2013. What do reproductive-age women who undergo oocyte cryopreservation think about the process as a means to preserve fertility? Fertility and Sterility 100:1343–1349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority. 2018a. Trends and figures: 2010–2016. Egg freezing in fertility treatment; [cited 2020 Jan 8]. Available from: https://www.hfea.gov.uk/media/2656/egg-freezing-in-fertility-treatment-trends-and-figures-2010-2016-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority. 2018b. Press release: age is the key factor for egg freezing success says new HFEA report, as overall treatment numbers remain low; [cited 2020 Jan 8]. Available from: https://www.hfea.gov.uk/about-us/news-and-press-releases/2018-news-and-press-releases/press-release-age-is-the-key-factor-for-egg-freezing-success-says-new-hfea-report-as-overall-treatment-numbers-remain-low/
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority. 2019. Trends and figures: 2014–2016. Fertility treatment; [cited 2020 Jan 8]. Available from: https://www.hfea.gov.uk/media/2563/hfea-fertility-trends-and-figures-2017-v2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ikhena-Abel DE, Confino R, Shah NJ, Lawson AK, Klock SC, Robins JC, et al. 2017. Is employer coverage of elective egg freezing coercive? A survey of medical students' knowledge, intentions, and attitudes towards elective egg freezing and employer coverage. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 34:1035–1041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones BP, Saso S, Mania A, Smith JR, Serhal P, Ben Nagi J, et al. 2018. The dawn of a new ice age: social egg freezing. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 97:641–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim TJ, Laufer LR, Hong SW. 2010. Vitrification of oocytes produces high pregnancy rates when carried out in fertile women. Fertility and Sterility 93:467–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuleshova L, Gianaroli L, Magli C, Ferraretti A, Trounson A. 1999. Birth following vitrification of a small number of human oocytes: case report. Human Reproduction 14:3077–3079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lallemant C, Vassard D, Nyboe Andersen A, Schmidt L, Macklon N. 2016. Medical and social egg freezing: internet-based survey of knowledge and attitudes among women in Denmark and the UK. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 95:1402–1410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood G. 2011. Social egg freezing: the prospect of reproductive 'immortality' or a dangerous delusion? Reproductive Biomedicine Online 23:334–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malchau SS, Henningsen AA, Loft A, Rasmussen S, Forman J, Nyboe Andersen A, et al. 2017. The long-term prognosis for live birth in couples initiating fertility treatments. Human Reproduction 32:1439–1449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesen TB, Mersereau JE, Kane JB, Steiner AZ. 2015. Optimal timing for elective egg freezing. Fertility and Sterility 103:1551–1556.e4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milman LW, Senapati S, Sammel MD, Cameron KD, Gracia C. 2017. Assessing reproductive choices of women and the likelihood of oocyte cryopreservation in the era of elective oocyte freezing. Fertility and Sterility 107:1214–1222.e3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy ZP, Anderson RE, Feinberg EC, Hayward B, Mahony MC. 2017. The Human Oocyte Preservation Experience (HOPE) Registry: evaluation of cryopreservation techniques and oocyte source on outcomes. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 15:10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanda S, Nelson-Piercy C, Mackillop L. 2012. Cardiac disease in pregnancy. Clinical Medicine 12:553–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics (ONS). 2019. Birth characteristics in England and Wales 2017: average ages of mothers and fathers of all babies have continued to rise; [cited 2019 Oct 25]. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/livebirths/bulletins/birthcharacteristicsinenglandandwales/2017
   Google Scholar
• Parmegiani L, Cognigni GE, Bernardi S, Cuomo S, Ciampaglia W, Infante FE, et al. 2011. Efficiency of aseptic open vitrification and hermetical cryostorage of human oocytes. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 23:505–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• POSEIDON Group (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualized Oocyte Number). 2016. A new more detailed stratification of low responders to ovarian stimulation: from a poor ovarian response to a low prognosis concept. Fertility and Sterility 105:1452–1453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potdar N, Gelbaya TA, Nardo LG. 2014. Oocyte vitrification in the 21st century and post-warming fertility outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 29:159–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell A. 2019. Women and the economy. Briefing paper number CBP06838. House of commons library; [cited 2019 Oct 25]. Available from: https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn06838/#fullreport
   Google Scholar
• Rienzi L, Romano S, Albricci L, Maggiulli R, Capalbo A, Baroni E, et al. 2010. Embryo development of fresh 'versus' vitrified metaphase II oocytes after ICSI: a prospective randomized sibling-oocyte study. Human Reproduction 25:66–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rienzi L, Cobo A, Paffoni A, Scarduelli C, Capalbo A, Vajta G, et al. 2012. Consistent and predictable delivery rates after oocyte vitrification: an observational longitudinal cohort multicentric study. Human Reproduction 27:1606–1612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roantree B., Vira K. 2018. The rise and rise of women’s employment in the UK. IFS briefing note BN234. Institute for Fiscal Studies. Economic and Social Research Council; [cited 2020 Jan 9]. Available from: https://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/12951
   Google Scholar
• Robertson JA. 2014. Egg freezing and egg banking: empowerment and alienation in assisted reproduction. Journal of Law and the Biosciences 1:113–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargent M. 2007. Regulating egg donation: a comparative analysis of reproductive technologies in the United States and United Kingdom. Michigan Journal of Public Affairs – Vol. 4, Spring 2007; [cited 2020 May 16]. Available from: http://sites.fordschool.umich.edu/mjpa/files/2014/06/2007-Sargent-EggDonation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schoolcraft WB, Keller JL, Schlenker T. 2009. Excellent embryo quality obtained from vitrified oocytes. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 19:820–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shkedi-Rafid S, Hashiloni-Dolev Y. 2011. Egg freezing for age-related fertility decline: preventive medicine or a further medicalization of reproduction? Analyzing the new Israeli policy. Fertility and Sterility 96:291–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simopoulou M, Sfakianoudis K, Bakas P, Giannelou P, Papapetrou C, Kalampokas T, et al. 2018. Postponing pregnancy through oocyte cryopreservation for social reasons: considerations regarding clinical practice and the socio-psychological and bioethical issues involved. Medicina 54:76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith GD, Serafini PC, Fioravanti J, Yadid I, Coslovsky M, Hassun P, et al. 2010. Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification. Fertility and Sterility 94:2088–2095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART). 2016. National summary report 2016: oocyte banking for fertility preservation; [cited 2019 Dec 6]. Available from: https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?reportingYear=2016#
   Google Scholar
• Sozou PD, Hartshorne GM. 2012. Time to pregnancy: a computational method for using the duration of non-conception for predicting conception. PLoS One 7:e46544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoop D, Nekkebroeck J, Devroey P. 2011. A survey on the intentions and attitudes towards oocyte cryopreservation for non-medical reasons among women of reproductive age. Human Reproduction 26:655–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan SQ, Tan AWK, Lau MSK, Tan HH, Nadarajah S. 2014. Social oocyte freezing: a survey among Singaporean female medical students. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 40:1345–1352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tozzo P, Fassina A, Nespeca P, Spigarolo G, Caenazzo L. 2019. Understanding social oocyte freezing in Italy: a scoping survey on university female students' awareness and attitudes. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 15:3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2015. The world’s women 2015: trends and statistics; [cited 2019 Oct 25]. Available from: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/gender/worldswomen.html
   Google Scholar
• Vallejo V, Lee JA, Schuman L, Witkin G, Cervantes E, Sandler B, et al. 2013. Social and psychological assessment of women undergoing elective oocyte cryopreservation: a 7-year analysis. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 3:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• van Loendersloot LL, Moolenaar LM, Mol BWJ, Repping S, van der Veen F, Goddijn M, et al. 2011. Expanding reproductive lifespan: a cost-effectiveness study on oocyte freezing. Human Reproduction 26:3054–3060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victorian Assisted Reproductive Treatment Authority (VARTA). 2018. 2018 annual report: frozen egg use in IVF doubled in two years in Victoria; [cited 2020 Jan 8]. Available from: https://www.varta.org.au/resources/news/frozen-egg-use-ivf-doubled-two-years-victoria
   Google Scholar
• Wennberg AL, Schildauer K, Brännström M. 2019. Elective oocyte freezing for nonmedical reasons: a 6-year report on utilization and in vitro fertilization results from a Swedish center. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 98:1429–1434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon TK, Kim TJ, Park SE, Hong SW, Ko JJ, Chung HM, Cha KY. 2003. Live births after vitrification of oocytes in a stimulated in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program. Fertility and Sterility 79:1323–1326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon TK, Lee DR, Cha SK, Chung HM, Lee WS, Cha KY, et al. 2007. Survival rate of human oocytes and pregnancy outcome after vitrification using slush nitrogen in assisted reproductive technologies. Fertility and Sterility 88:952–956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu L, Peterson B, Inhorn MC, Boehm JK, Patrizio P. 2016. Knowledge, attitudes, and intentions toward fertility awareness and oocyte cryopreservation among obstetrics and gynecology resident physicians. Human Reproduction 31:403–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar