Diagnosis of central nervous system abnormalities: comparison of prenatal neurosonography and foetal magnetic resonance imaging findings

References

• Ceausescu A, Docea A, Dinu M, Degeratu S, Iliescu D, Cara M. 2018. Foetal central nervous system abnormalities. In: Tudorache S, editor. Congenital anomalies – from the embryo to the neonate, vol. 3. San Francisco (CA): Intech. p. 4–68.
   Google Scholar
• Conte G, Parazzini C, Falanga G, Cesaretti C, Izzo G, Rustico M, et al. 2016. Diagnostic value of prenatal MR imaging in the detection of brain malformations in fetuses before the 26th week of gestational age. American Journal of Neuroradiology 37:946–951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egloff A, Bulas D. 2015. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of foetal neural tube defects. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT, and MR 36:487–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriş Yalçın S, Yalçın Y, Tola EN, Yavuz A, Akkurt MÖ, Sezik M, Özkaya MO. 2018. Investigation of foetal magnetic resonance imaging indications. Perinatal Journal 26:18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Glass HC, Shaw GM, Ma C, Sherr EH. 2008. Agenesis of the corpus callosum in California 1983–2003: a population‐based study. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A 146A:2495–2500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenn OA, Goldstein RB, Li KC, Young SJ, Norton ME, Busse RF, et al. 2005. Foetal magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of fetuses referred for sonographically suspected abnormalities of the corpus callosum. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine: Official Journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine 24:791–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths P, Reeves M, Morris J, Mason G, Russell S, Paley M, et al. 2010. A prospective study of fetuses with isolated ventriculomegaly investigated by antenatal sonography and in utero MR imaging. American Journal of Neuroradiology 31:106–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard AM, Harty MP, States LJ. 1999. A new tool for prenatal diagnosis: ultrafast foetal MRI. Seminars in Perinatology 23:437–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis D, Mooney C, Cohen J, Papaioannou D, Bradburn M, Sutton A, Griffiths PD. 2017. A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of MR imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities in utero. European Radiology 27:2367–2380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kul S, Korkmaz HAA, Cansu A, Dinc H, Ahmetoglu A, Guven S, Imamoglu M. 2012. Contribution of MRI to ultrasound in the diagnosis of foetal anomalies. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 35:882–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manganaro L, Bernardo S, Antonelli A, Vinci V, Saldari M, Catalano C. 2017. Foetal MRI of the central nervous system: state-of-the-art. European Journal of Radiology 93:273–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manganaro L, Bernardo S, La Barbera L, Noia G, Masini L, Tomei A, et al. 2012. Role of foetal MRI in the evaluation of ischaemic-haemorrhagic lesions of the foetal brain. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 40:419–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paladini D, Malinger G, Monteagudo A, Pilu G, Timor-Tritsch I, Toi A. 2007. Sonographic examination of the foetal central nervous system: guidelines for performing the ‘basic examination’ and the ‘foetal neurosonogram’. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 29:109–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parazzini C, Righini A, Doneda C, Arrigoni F, Rustico M, Lanna M, et al. 2012. Is foetal magnetic resonance imaging indicated when ultrasound isolated mild ventriculomegaly is present in pregnancies with no risk factors? Prenatal Diagnosis 32:752–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raafat RM, Abdelrahman TM, Hafez MA. 2020. The prevalence and the adding value of foetal MRI imaging in midline cerebral anomalies. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine 51:51–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reda AM, Ali R-E-D, Salem HAA, El-Shafey KE. 2018. Added value of foetal magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of central nervous system congenital anomalies in Egyptian population. International Journal of Medical Imaging 6:40–48.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi A, Prefumo F. 2014. Additional value of foetal magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system anomalies: a systematic review of the literature. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 44:388–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon L, Alfirevic Z, Berghella V, Bilardo C, Hernandez‐Andrade E, Johnsen S, ISUOG Clinical Standards Committee, et al. 2011. Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester foetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 37:116–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sefidbakht S, Dehghani S, Safari M, Vafaei H, Kasraeian M. 2016. Foetal central nervous system anomalies detected by magnetic resonance imaging: a two-year experience. Iranian Journal of Pediatrics 26:e4589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith FW, Adam AH, Phillips WDP. 1983. NMR imaging in pregnancy. The Lancet 321:61–62.
   Google Scholar
• Tanacan A, Ozgen B, Fadiloglu E, Unal C, Oguz KK, Beksac MS. 2020. Prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system abnormalities: neurosonography versus foetal magnetic resonance imaging. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 250:195–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verburg B, Fink AM, Reidy K, Palma-Dias R. 2015. The contribution of MRI after foetal anomalies have been diagnosed by ultrasound: correlation with postnatal outcomes. Foetal Diagnosis and Therapy 38:186–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitby EH, Paley MNJ, Sprigg A, Rutter S, Davies NP, Wilkinson ID, Griffiths PD. 2004. Comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in 100 singleton pregnancies with suspected brain abnormalities. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 111:784–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalçın SE, Yalçın Y, Tola EN, Yavuz A, Akkurt MÖ, Sezik M, et al. 2018. Foetal manyetik rezonans görüntüleme endikasyonlarının incelenmesi. Perinatoloji Dergisi. 26(1):18–24.
   Google Scholar