Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Volume 42, 2022 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
116
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Gynaecology

Outcomes of a fixed skeletonised mini mesh implant for pelvic organ prolapse repair with uterine preservation

Omri Levora Azrielli Faculty of Medicine in the Galilee, Bar Ilan University, Safed, Israel
,
Menahem Neumanb Assuta Medical Centers, Tel Aviv and Rishon LeZion, Nahariya, Israel
&
Jacob Bornsteina Azrielli Faculty of Medicine in the Galilee, Bar Ilan University, Safed, Israel;c Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, IsraelCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1932-5270
ORCID Icon
Pages 490-493 | Published online: 25 Jun 2021

References

  • Abed H, Rahn DD, Lowenstein L, Balk EM, Clemons JL, Rogers RG. 2011. Systematic review group of the society of gynecologic surgeons. incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review. International Urogynecology Journal 22:789–798.
  • Besser L, Schwarzman P, Mastrolia SA, Rotem R, Leron E, Yohay D, Weintraub AY. 2018. Comparative analysis of early adverse events of pelvic organ prolapse repair with or without transvaginal mesh using Clavien-Dindo classification. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 142: 108–113.
  • Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, et al. 1996. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 175:10–17.
  • Carey M, Higgs P, Goh J, Lim J, Leong A, Krause H, Cornish A. 2009. Vaginal repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy for prolapse: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 116:1380–1386.
  • Dallas KB, Rogo-Gupta L, Elliott CS. 2018. What impacts the all cause risk of reoperation after pelvic organ prolapse repair? A comparison of mesh and native tissue approaches in 110,329 women. Journal of Urology 200: 389–396.
  • Fialkow MF, Newton KM, Weiss NS. 2008. Incidence of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse 10 years following primary surgical management: a retrospective cohort study. International Urogynecology Journal 19:1483–1487.
  • Gaines N, Gupta P, Sirls L. 2016. Pelvic prolapse repair in the era of mesh. Current Urology Reports 17: 20.
  • Ganer HH, et al. 2019. Risk of mesh erosion after pelvic organ prolapse repair with or without concomitant vaginal hysterectomy. The Israel Medical Association Journal 21: 399–403.
  • Jia X, Glazener C, Mowatt G, MacLennan G, Bain C, Fraser C, Burr J. 2008. Efficacy and safety of using mesh or grafts in surgery for anterior and/or posterior vaginal wall prolapse: Systematic review and meta‐analysis. BJOG 115:1350–1361.
  • Kontogiannis S, Goulimi E, Giannitsas K. 2016. Reasons for and against use of non-absorbable, synthetic mesh during pelvic organ prolapse repair, according to the prolapsed compartment. Advances in Therapy 33: 2139–2149.
  • Nguyen JN, Burchette RJ. 2008. Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology 111:891–898.
  • Persu C, Chapple CR, Cauni V, Gutue S, Geavlete P. 2011. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP–Q)–a new era in pelvic prolapse staging. Journal of Medicine and Life 4:75–81.
  • Rudnicki M, Laurikainen E, Pogosean R, Kinne I, Jakobsson U, Teleman P. 2016. A 3–year follow‐up after anterior colporrhaphy compared with collagen‐coated transvaginal mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 123:136–142.
  • Schimpf MO, Abed H, Sanses T, White AB, Lowenstein L, Ward RM, et al. 2016. Society of gynecologic surgeons systematic review group. Graft and mesh use in transvaginal prolapse repair: a systematic review. Obstetrics and Gynecology 128: 81–91.
  • Wang LC, Al Hussein Al Awamlh B, Hu JC, Laudano MA, Davison WL, Schulster ML, et al. 2015. Trends in mesh use for pelvic organ prolapse repair from the Medicare database. Urology 86:885–891.
  • Warembourg S, Labaki M, de Tayrac R, Costa P, Fatton B. 2017. Reoperations for mesh-related complications after pelvic organ prolapse repair: 8-year experience at a tertiary referral center. International Urogynecology Journal 28: 1139–1151.
  • Weintraub AY, Neuman M, Reuven Y, Neymeyer J, Marcus-Braun N. 2016. Efficacy and safety of skeletonized mesh implants for advanced pelvic organ prolapse: 12-month follow-up. World Journal of Urology 34:1491–1498.
  • Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson Funk M. 2014. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstetrics and Gynecology 123:1201–1206.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.