Evaluating the role of endometrial colour Doppler dynamic tissue perfusion measurements in in vitro fertilisation success

References

• Alcazar JL. 2006. Three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of endometrial receptivity: a review. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 4:56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciatore B, Simberg N, Fusaro P, Tiitinen A. 1996. Transvaginal Doppler study of uterine artery blood flow in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles. Fertility and Sterility 66:130–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Disease Control and Prevention. 2019. Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). [accessed October 2019]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/art/artdata/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Craciunas L, Gallos I, Chu J, Bourne T, Quenby S, Brosens JJ, Coomarasamy A. 2019. Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update 25:202–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey RP. 1997. Doppler ultrasound investigation of uterine and ovarian blood flow in infertility and early pregnancy. Human Reproduction Update 3:467–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsokkary M, Eldin AB, Abdelhafez M, Rateb A, Samy M, Eldorf A, et al. 2019. The reproducibility of the novel utilization of five-dimensional ultrasound and power Doppler in the prediction of endometrial receptivity in intracytoplasmic sperm-injected women: a pilot prospective clinical study. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 299:551–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedler S, Schenker JG, Herman A, Lewin A. 1996. The role of ultrasonography in the evaluation of endometrial receptivity following assisted reproductive treatments: a critical review. Human Reproduction Update 2:323–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou Z, Zhang Q, Zhao J, Xu A, He A, Huang X, et al. 2019. Value of endometrial echo pattern transformation after hCG trigger in predicting IVF pregnancy outcome: a prospective cohort study. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 17:74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iritani A. 1991. Micromanipulation of gametes for in vitro assisted fertilization. Molecular Reproduction and Development 28:199–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanovski M, Damcevski N, Radevska B, Doicev G. 2012. Assessment of uterine artery and arcuate artery blood flow by transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration as predictors of pregnancy in an in vitro fertilization program. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiia 51:55–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim A, Jung H, Choi WJ, Hong SN, Kim HY. 2014. Detection of endometrial and subendometrial vasculature on the day of embryo transfer and prediction of pregnancy during fresh in vitro fertilization cycles. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 53:360–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo HS, Park CW, Cha SH, Yang KM. 2018. Serial evaluation of endometrial blood flow for prediction of pregnancy outcomes in patients who underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine: Official Journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine 37:851–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma NZ, Chen L, Dai W, Bu ZQ, Hu LL, Sun YP. 2017. Influence of endometrial thickness on treatment outcomes following in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 15:5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maged AM, Kamel AM, Abu-Hamila F, Elkomy RO, Ohida OA, Hassan SM, et al. 2019. The measurement of endometrial volume and sub-endometrial vascularity to replace the traditional endometrial thickness as predictors of in-vitro fertilization success. Gynecological Endocrinology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology 35:949–954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercé LT, Barco MJ, Bau S, Troyano J. 2008. Are endometrial parameters by three-dimensional ultrasound and power Doppler angiography related to in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer outcome? Fertility and Sterility 89:111–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra VV, Agarwal R, Sharma U, Aggarwal R, Choudhary S, Bandwal P. 2016. Endometrial and subendometrial vascularity by three-dimensional (3D) power Doppler and its correlation with pregnancy outcome in Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET) cycles. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India 66:521–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy ZP, Liu J, Joris H, Bocken G, Desmet B, Van Ranst H, et al. 1995. The influence of the site of sperm deposition and mode of oolemma breakage at intracytoplasmic sperm injection on fertilization and embryo development rates. Human Reproduction 10:3171–3177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng EH, Chan CC, Tang OS, Yeung WS, Ho PC. 2007. The role of endometrial blood flow measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound in the prediction of pregnancy during in vitro fertilization treatment. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 135:8–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng EH, Chan CC, Tang OS, Yeung WS, Ho PC. 2009. Changes in endometriyal and subendometriyal blood flow in IVF. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 18:269–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanski LT, Baumgarten MN, Brosens J, Quenby S, Campbell B, Martins W, et al. 2016. Endometrial spatio-temporal image correlation (STIC) and prediction of outcome following assisted reproductive treatment. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 203:320–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubino P, Viganò P, Luddi A, Piomboni P. 2016. The ICSI procedure from past to future: a systematic review of the more controversial aspects. Human Reproduction Update 22:194–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son JB, Jeong JE, Joo JK, Na YJ, Kim CW, Lee KS. 2014. Measurement of endometrial and uterine vascularity by transvaginal ultrasonography in predicting pregnancy outcome during frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 40:1661–1667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanos V, Lingwood L, Balami S. 2020. Junctional zone endometrium morphological characteristics and functionality: review of the literature. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 85:107–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Xia F, Zhou Y, Wei X, Zhuang Y, Huang Y. 2018. Association between endometrial/subendometrial vasculature and embryo transfer outcome: a meta-analysis and subgroup analysis. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 37:149–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaman C, Mayer R. 2012. Three-dimensional ultrasound as a predictor of pregnancy in patients undergoing ART. Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association 13:128–134.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang JH, Wu MY, Chen CD, Jiang MC, Ho HN, Yang YS. 1999. Association of endometrial blood flow as determined by a modified colour Doppler technique with subsequent outcome of in vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction 14:1606–1610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz N, Kiliç S, Madendag Y, Madendag I, Ozgun A, Ozaksit G, et al. 2010. Endometrial parameters in IVF and IUI administration on elderly women. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 40:343–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidi J, Campbell S, Pittrof R, Tan SL. 1995. Endometrial thicness, morphology, vascular penetration and velocimetry in predicting implantation in an in vitro fertilization program. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 6:191–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang T, He Y, Wang Y, Zhu Q, Yang J, Zhao X, et al. 2016. The role of three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound parameters measured on hCG day in the prediction of pregnancy during in vitro fertilization treatment. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 203:66–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar