Caesarean section rates in primigravid women categorised by age and BMI

References

• Barau G, Robillard P-Y, Hulsey T, Dedecker F, Laffite A, Gérardin P, et al. 2006. Linear association between maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and risk of caesarean section in term deliveries. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 113:1173–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayrampour H, Heaman M. 2010. Advanced maternal age and the risk of cesarean birth: a systematic review. Birth 37:219–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergholt T, Lim LK, Jørgensen JS, Robson MS. 2007. Maternal body mass index in the first trimester and risk of cesarean delivery in nulliparous women in spontaneous labor. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 196:163. e1–163. e5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. 2016. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLOS One 11:e0148343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke N, Burke G, Breathnach F, Mcauliffe F, Morrison JJ, Turner M, et al. 2017. Prediction of cesarean delivery in the term nulliparous woman: results from the prospective, multicenter Genesis study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 216:598. e1–598. e11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Uryasev S, Young TK. 2004. On prediction of the cesarean delivery risk in a large private practice. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 191:616–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheney K, Farber R, Barratt AL, Mcgeechan K, De Vries B, Ogle R, et al. 2018. Population attributable fractions of perinatal outcomes for nulliparous women associated with overweight and obesity, 1990–2014. The Medical Journal of Australia 208:119–125.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CSO. 2017. Average age of mother classification by marital status. In: CSO (ed.). Ireland: Central Statistics Office.
   Google Scholar
• Einarsdóttir K, Sigurðardóttir H, Ingibjörg Bjarnadóttir R, Steingrímsdóttir Þ, Smárason AK. 2019. The Robson 10-group classification in Iceland: obstetric interventions and outcomes. Birth 46:270–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field A, Haloob R. 2016. Complications of caesarean section. The Obstetrician and Gynaecologist 18:265–272.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick K, Tuffnell D, Kurinczuk J, Knight M. 2017. Pregnancy at very advanced maternal age: a UK population‐based cohort study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 124:1097–1106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganeriwal SA, Ryan GA, Purandare NC, Purandare CN. 2021. Examining the role and relevance of the critical analysis and comparison of cesarean section rates in a changing world. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 60:20–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerli S, Favilli A, Franchini D, De Giorgi M, Casucci P, Parazzini F, et al. 2018. Is the Robson's classification system burdened by obstetric pathologies, maternal characteristics and assistential levels in comparing hospitals cesarean rates? A regional analysis of class 1 and 3. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 31:173–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guittier MJ, Cedraschi C, Jamei N, Boulvain M, Guillemin F. 2014. Impact of mode of delivery on the birth experience in first-time mothers: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 14:254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines N. 2017. Births by parents’ characteristics in England and Wales: 2016. In: O. F. N. Statistics (ed.). Office For National Statistics. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/livebirths/bulletins/birthsbyparentscharacteristicsinenglandandwales/2016.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy NC, Burke N, Breathnach FM, Burke G, Mcauliffe FM, Morrison JJ, et al. 2020. Inter-hospital comparison of Cesarean delivery rates should not be considered to reflect quality of care without consideration of patient heterogeneity: an observational study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 250:112–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nippita TA, Lee YY, Patterson JA, Ford JB, Morris JM, Nicholl MC, et al. 2015. Variation in hospital caesarean section rates and obstetric outcomes among nulliparae at term: a population-based cohort study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 122:702–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peregrine E, O'brien P, Omar R, Jauniaux E. 2006. Clinical and ultrasound parameters to predict the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor. Obstetrics and Gynecology 107:227–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersen-Dahl A, Murzakanova G, Sandvik L, Laine K. 2018. Maternal body mass index as a predictor for delivery method. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 97:212–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratnasiri AWG, Lee HC, Lakshminrusimha S, Parry SS, Arief VN, Delacy IH, et al. 2019. Trends in maternal prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and its association with birth and maternal outcomes in California, 2007–2016: a retrospective cohort study. PLOS One 14:e0222458–e0222458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson MS. 2001. Classification of caesarean sections. Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review 12:23–39.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan G, O Doherty KC, Devane D, Mcauliffe F, Morrison J. 2019. Questionnaire survey on women's views after a first caesarean delivery in two tertiary centres in Ireland and their preference for involvement in a future randomised trial on mode of birth. BMJ Open 9:e031766–e031766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schummers L, Hutcheon JA, Hacker MR, Vanderweele TJ, Williams PL, Mcelrath TA, et al. 2018. Absolute risks of obstetric outcomes risks by maternal age at first birth: a population-based cohort. Epidemiology 29:379–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolcher MC, Holbert MR, Weaver AL, Mcgree ME, Olson JE, El-Nashar SA, et al. 2015. Predicting cesarean delivery after induction of labor among nulliparous women at term. Obstetrics and Gynecology 126:1059–1068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vegel AJ, Benden DM, Borgert AJ, Kallies KJ, Kothari SN. 2017. Impact of obesity on cesarean delivery outcomes. WMJ 116:206–209.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verhoeven CJ, Oudenaarden A, Hermus MA, Porath MM, Oei SG, Mol BW. 2009. Validation of models that predict cesarean section after induction of labor. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 34:316–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinturache A, Mckeating A, Daly N, Sheehan S, Turner M. 2017. Maternal body mass index and the prevalence of spontaneous and elective preterm deliveries in an Irish obstetric population: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 7:e015258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. what is overweight and obesity? [online]; 2017 [cited 2017]. https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/childhood_what/en/.
   Google Scholar