93
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Pre-induction cervical ripening with different initial doses of intravaginal misoprostol: time to delivery and peri-natal outcomes

, , & ORCID Icon

References

  • Adeniyi AA, Odukogbe AA, Olayemi A, Oladokun O, Adeniji AO, Aimakhu CO, et al. 2014. Randomization of two dosing regimens of vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction in a low resource setting. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice 17:287–291.
  • Azubuike IJ, Bassey G, Okpani A. 2015. Comparison of 25 and 50 microgram of misoprostol for induction of labour in nulliparous women with postdate pregnancy in Port Harcourt. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice 18:263–267.
  • Bhide A. 2021. Induction of labor and cesarean section. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 100:187–188.
  • Duro-Gómez J, Garrido-Oyarzún MF, Rodríguez-Marín AB, de la Torre González AJ, Arjona-Berral JE, Castelo-Branco C. 2017a. Efficacy and safety of misoprostol, dinoprostone and Cook's balloon for labour induction in women with foetal growth restriction at term. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 296:777–781.
  • Duro-Gómez J, Garrido-Oyarzún MF, Rodríguez-Marín AB, de la Torre González AJ, Arjona-Berral JE, Castelo-Branco C. 2017b. What can we do to reduce the associated costs in induction of labour of intrauterine growth restriction foetuses at term? A cost-analysis study. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 296:483–488.
  • Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Mallett G, et al. 2018. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. The New England Journal of Medicine 379:513–523.
  • Hannah ME, Ohlsson A, Farine D, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Myhr TL, et al. 1996. Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. TERMPROM Study Group. New England Journal of Medicine 334:1005–1010.
  • Jenabi E, Khazaei S. 2018. The association of between assisted reproduction technology and malpresentation/induction of labor: a meta-analysis. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 31:2782–2787.
  • Kreft M, Krähenmann F, Roos M, Kurmanavicius J, Zimmermann R, Ochsenbein-Kölble N. 2014. Maternal and neonatal outcome of labour induction at term comparing two regimens of misoprostol. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 42:603–609.
  • Little SE. 2017. Elective induction of labor: what is the impact? Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 44:601–614.
  • Little SE, Caughey AB. 2015. Induction of labor and cesarean: what is the true relationship? Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 58:269–281.
  • Middleton P, Shepherd E, Crowther CA. 2018. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 5:CD004945.
  • Nigam A, Madan M, Puri M, Agarwal S, Trivedi SS. 2010. Labour induction with 25 micrograms versus 50 micrograms intravaginal misoprostol in full term pregnancies. Tropical Doctor 40:53–55.
  • Penfield CA, Wing DA. 2017. Labor induction techniques: which is the best? Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 44:567–582.
  • Pinheiro RL, Areia AL, Mota Pinto A, Donato H. 2019. Advanced maternal age: adverse outcomes of pregnancy, a meta-analysis. Acta Medica Portuguesa 32:219–226.
  • Poma PA. 1996. Premature rupture of membranes. Journal of the National Medical Association 88:27–32.
  • Sotiriadis A, Petousis S, Thilaganathan B, Figueras F, Martins WP, Odibo AO, et al. 2019. Maternal and perinatal outcomes after elective induction of labor at 39 weeks in uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 53:26–35.
  • Suresh SC, Kucirka L, Chau DB, Hadley M, Sheffield JS. 2021. Evidence-based protocol decreases time to vaginal delivery in elective inductions. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM 3:100294.
  • Wollmann CL, Ahlberg M, Petersson G, Saltvedt S, Stephansson O. 2017. Time-to-delivery and delivery outcomes comparing three methods of labor induction in 7551 nulliparous women: a population-based cohort study. Journal of Perinatology 37:1197–1203.
  • World Health Organization. 2018. WHO recommendations: induction of labour at or beyond term [online]. World Health Organization. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/277233/9789241550413-eng.pdf?ua=1
  • Zhang Y, Zhu HP, Fan JX, Yu H, Sun LZ, Chen L, et al. 2015. Intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction in nulliparous women: a double-blinded, prospective randomized controlled study. Chinese Medical Journal 128:2736–2742.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.