Umbilical cord diameter in the prediction of foetal growth restriction: a cross sectional study

References

• Barbieri C, Cecatti JG, Krupa F, Marussi EF, Costa JV. 2008. Validation study of the capacity of the reference curves of ultrasonographic measurements of the umbilical cord to identify deviations in estimated fetal weight. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 87:286–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bimpong S, Abaidoo CS, Atuahene OO, Tetteh J. 2019. Morphometric characterization of umbilical cord vessels and neonatal outcome. International Journal of Anatomy and Research 7:6050–6058.
   Google Scholar
• Chirtrarasan P, Kanagarameswarakumaran S. 2017. Role of obstetric Doppler in prediction of adverse perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth retardation. International Journal of Advances in Medicine 4:529–533.
   Google Scholar
• Coomarasamy A, Fisk N, Gee H, Robson S. 2002. The investigation and management of the small for gestational age fetus. London: RCOG Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dacaj R, Izetbegovic S, Stojkanovic G, Gjocaj C. 2016. Hepato- cephalic index as a predictor of intrauterine growth restriction. Acta Informatica Medica 24:12–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dawson B, Trapp RG. 4th edition Basic & Clinical Biostatistics: (LANGE Basic Science 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Figueras F, Gratacos E. 2014. Update on the diagnosis and classification of fetal growth restriction and proposal of a stage-based management protocol. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 36:86–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gayatri R, Crasta J, Thomas T, Pratibha D, Thomas A, Sridhar TS, Kurpad AV. 2017. Structural analysis of the umbilical cord and its vessels in intrauterine growth restriction and pre-eclampsia. Journal of Fetal Medicine 4:85–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins LE, Simcox L, Sibley CP, Heazell AE, Johnstone ED. 2016. Third trimester placental volume and biometry measurement: a methoddevelopment study. Placenta 42:51–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail KI, Hannigan A, O’Donoghue K, Cotter A. 2019. Role of 2-dimensional ultrasound imaging in placental and umbilical cord morphometry: literature and pictorial review. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 38:3131–3140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail K, Hannigan A, Kelehan P, Fitzgerald B, O’Donoghue K, Cotter A. 2020. Small for gestational age infants and the association with placental and umbilical cord morphometry: a digital imaging study. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 33:3632–3639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javor D, Nasel C, Schweim T, Dekan S, Chalubinski K, Prayer D. 2013. In vivo assessment of putative functional placental tissue volume in placental intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) in human fetuses using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. Placenta 34:676–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewkowitz AK, Tuuli MG, Cahill AG, Macones GA, Dicke JM. 2019. Perinatal outcomes after intrauterine growth restriction and intermittently elevated umbilical artery Doppler. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM 1:64–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna D, Tharmaratnam S, Mahsud S, Dornan J. 2005. Ultrasonic evidence of placental calcification at 36 weeks gestation: maternal and fetal outcomes. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 84:7–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miremberg H, Grinstein E, Herman HG, Marelly C, Barber E, Schreiber L, et al. 2020. The association between isolated oligohydramnios at term and placental pathology in correlation with pregnancy outcomes. Placenta 90:37–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). 2008. Antenatal care for uncomplicated pregnancies. Clinical guideline: March 2008. Cg62.
   Google Scholar
• Peyter C, Delhaes F, Baud D, Vial Y, Diaceri G, Menetrey S, et al. 2014. Intrauterine growth restriction is associated with structural alterations in human umbilical cord and decreased nitric oxide-induced relaxation of umbilical vein. Placenta 35:891–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelan JP, Ahn MO, Smith CV, et al. 1987. Amniotic fluidindex measurements during pregnancy. J ReprodMed 32:601–604.
   Google Scholar
• Proud J. 1989. Placental grading as a test of fetal well-being. In: Robinson S, Thomson AM, editors. Midwives, research and childbirth. Boston (MA): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Proud J, Grant AM. 1987. Third trimester placental grading by ultrasonography as a test of fetal wellbeing. British Medical Journal 294:1641–1644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal College Of Obstetrics and Gynecology (RCOG). 2013. The investigation and management of the small for gestational age fetus. Green top guideline No 31. 2nd edition, February 2013, minor revisions- January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Sibai B, Dekker G, Kupferminc M. 2005. Preeclampsia. The Lancet 365:785–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somprasit C, Chanthasenanont A, Nuntakomon T. 2010. The change of umbilical cord components in intrauterine growth restriction comparative with normal growth fetuses by using sonographic measurement. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 93:7.
   Google Scholar
• Srikumar S, Debnath J, Ravikumar R, Bandhu HC, Maurya VK. 2017. Doppler indices of the umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery at 18–40 weeks of normal gestation: a pilot study. Medical Journal, Armed Forces India 73:232–241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weissman A, Jakobi P. 1997. Sonographic measurements of the umbilical cord in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 16:691–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar