Long-term quality of life assessment after excisional treatment for cervical dysplasia

References

• Bogani G, Pinelli C, Chiappa V, Martinelli F, Lopez S, Ditto A, Raspagliesi F. 2020. Age-specific predictors of cervical dysplasia recurrence after primary conization: analysis of 3,212 women. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 31:e60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogani G, Sopracordevole F, Di Donato V, Ciavattini A, Ghelardi A, Lopez S, et al. 2021. High-risk HPV-positive and -negative high-grade cervical dysplasia: analysis of 5-year outcomes. Gynecologic Oncology 161:173–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casarin J, Bogani G, Papadia A, Ditto A, Pinelli C, Garzon S, et al. 2021. Preoperative conization and risk of recurrence in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: a multicenter study. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 28:117–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Liu L, Tao X, Guo L, Zhang H, Sui L. 2019. Risk factor analysis of persistent high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion after loop electrosurgical excision procedure conization. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease 23:24–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drolet M, Bénard É, Pérez N, Brisson M, Ali H, Boily M-C, et al. 2019. Population-level impact and herd effects following the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 394:497–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fregnani CMS, Fregnani JHT G, Longatto-Filho A. 2017. Methodological study to evaluate the psychometric properties of FACIT-CD in a sample of Brazilian women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. BMC Cancer 17:686.
   Google Scholar
• Heinonen A, Jakobsson M, Kiviharju M, Virtanen S, Aro K, Kyrgiou M, et al. 2020. Role of colposcopy after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cancers 12:1683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellsten C, Sjöström K, Lindqvist PG. 2009. A longitudinal 2-year follow-up of quality of life in women referred for colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 147:221–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesić V, Sparić R, Watrowski R, Dotlić J, Stefanović R, Marić G, Pekmezović T. 2018. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – Cervical Dysplasia (FACIT-CD) Questionnaire for Serbian women. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 226:7–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SI, Choi BR, Kim HS, Chung HH, Kim JW, Park NH, et al. 2022. Cervical conization before primary radical hysterectomy has a protective effect on disease recurrence in early cervical cancer: a two-center matched cohort study according to surgical approach. Gynecologic Oncology 164:535–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyrgiou M, Athanasiou A, Paraskevaidi M, Mitra A, Kalliala I, Martin-Hirsch P, et al. 2016. Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis. British Medical Journal 354:i3633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor M, Gallagher P, Waller J, Martin CM, O'Leary JJ, Sharp L, et al. 2016. Adverse psychological outcomes following colposcopy and related procedures: a systematic review. British Journal of Gynecology 123:24–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao D, Gela N, Daley EM, Kattezham R, Rodriguez G, Cella D. 2010. Developing a measure of health-related quality of life for women with cervical dysplasia resulting from human papillomavirus infection. International Journal of STD & AIDS 21:697–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rask M, Oscarsson M, Ludwig N, Swahnberg K. 2017. The Swedish translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – Cervical Dysplasia (FACIT-CD): linguistic validity and reliability of the Swedish version. BMC Women's Health 17:24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankar M, Chi C, Kadir RA. 2008. Review of quality of life: menorrhagia in women with or without inherited bleeding disorders. Haemophilia 14:15–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp L, Cotton SC, Cruickshank ME, Gray NM, Neal K, Rothnie K, et al. 2015. Long-term worries after colposcopy: which women are at increased risk? Women's Health Issues 25:517–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparić R, Papoutsis D, Kadija S, Stefanović R, Antonakou A, Nejković L, Kesić V. 2019a. Psychosexual outcomes in women of reproductive age at more than two-years from excisional cervical treatment – a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology 40:128–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparić R, Papoutsis D, Spremovic-Radjenovic S, Kadija S, Bukumiric Z, Likic-Ladjevic I, Kesic V. 2019b. Long-term attitude towards follow-up colposcopy in women of reproductive age after excisional treatment for cervical dysplasia. Srpski Arhiv za Celokupno Lekarstvo 147:321–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasinou SM, Valasoulis G, Kyrgiou M, Malamou-Mitsi V, Bilirakis E, Pappa L, et al. 2012. Large loop excision of the transformation zone and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a 22-year experience. Anticancer Research 32:4141–4145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. 2021. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 71:209–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timotijević I, Paunović VR. 2010. Instrumenti kliničke procene u psihijatriji. 3rd ed. Belgrade: Naša knjiga.
   Google Scholar
• Ting J, Kruzikas DT, Smith JS. 2010. A global review of age-specific and overall prevalence of cervical lesions. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer 20:1244–1249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenti G, Vitale SG, Tropea A, Biondi A, Laganà AS. 2017. Tumor markers of uterine cervical cancer: a new scenario to guide surgical practice? Updates in Surgery 69:441–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Heijden E, Lopes AD, Bryant A, Bekkers R, Galaal K. 2015. Follow-up strategies after treatment (large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ)) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN): impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) test. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1:CD010757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vänskä S, Luostarinen T, Lagheden C, Eklund C, Kleppe SN, Andrae B, et al. 2021. Differing age-specific cervical cancer incidence between different types of human papillomavirus: implications for predicting the impact of elimination programs. American Journal of Epidemiology 190:506–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Gandek B. 1998. Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 51:903–912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watrowski R, Rohde A. 2014a. Validation of the Polish version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in three populations of gynecologic patients. Archives of Medical Science 10:517–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watrowski R, Rohde A. 2014b. Psychological well-being of gynecologic and obstetric patients: a validation of the 12-item Well-Being Questionnaire (W-BQ12). Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 126:524–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang H, Hong S, Zheng L, Zhang L, Zhuang X, Wei H, Yang Y. 2019. Effects of cervical conisation on pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 39:74–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar