Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on female sexual function in women with female genital mutilation

References

• Abdel-Azim S. 2013. Psychosocial and sexual aspects of female circumcision. African Journal of Urology 19:141–142.
   Google Scholar
• Alsibiani SA, Rouzi AA. 2010. Sexual function in women with female genital mutilation. Fertility and Sterility 93:722–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameyaw EK, Tetteh JK, Armah-Ansah EK, Aduo-Adjei K, Sena-Iddrisu A. 2020. Female genital mutilation/cutting in Sierra Leone: are educated women intending to circumcise their daughters? BMC İnternational Health and Human Rights 20:19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anis TH, Aboul Gheit S, Awad HH, Saied HS. 2012. Effects of female genital cutting on the sexual function of Egyptian women. A cross-sectional study. The Journal of Sexual Medicine 9:2682–2692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg RC, Denison E, Fretheim A. 2010. Psychological, social and sexual consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C): a systematic review of quantitative studies [Internet]. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); Report from Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services (NOKC) No. 13-2010. PMID: 29320049.
   Google Scholar
• Bhambhvani HP, Chen T, Kasman AM, Wilson-King G, Enemchukwu E, Eisenberg ML. 2021. Female sexual function during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Sexual Medicine 9:100355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buggio L, Facchin F, Chiappa L, Barbara G, Brambilla M, Vercellini P. 2019. Psychosexual consequences of female genital mutilation and the impact of reconstructive surgery: a narrative review. Health Equity 3:36–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Creighton SM, Dear J, de Campos C, Williams L, Hodes D. 2016. Multidisciplinary approach to the management of children with female genital mutilation (FGM) or suspected FGM: service description and case series. BMJ Open 6:e010311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Schrijver L, Leye E, Merckx M. 2016. A multidisciplinary approach to clitoral reconstruction after female genital mutilation: the crucial role of counselling. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 21:269–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorkeno E, Elworthy S. 1992. Female genital mutilation. Proposals for changes. London: Minority Rights Group International.
   Google Scholar
• Elnashar A, Abdelhady R. 2007. The impact of female genital cutting on health of newly married women. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 97:238–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esho T, Kimani S, Nyamongo I, Kimani V, Muniu S, Kigondu C, et al. 2017. The ‘heat’ goes away: sexual disorders of married women with female genital mutilation/cutting in Kenya. Reproductive Health 14:164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs A, Matonóg A, Pilarska J, Sieradzka P, Szul M, Czuba B, et al. 2020. The impact of COVID-19 on female sexual health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17:7152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton LD, Meston CM. 2013. Chronic stress and sexual function in women. The Journal of Sexual Medicine 10:2443–2454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz CR, Jackson JC. 1997. Female “circumcision”: African women confront American medicine. Journal of General İnternal Medicine 12:491–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail SA, Abbas AM, Habib D, Morsy H, Saleh MA, Bahloul M. 2017. Effect of female genital mutilation/cutting; types I and II on sexual function: case-controlled study. Reproductive Health 14:108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosla R, Banerjee J, Chou D, Say L, Fried ST. 2017. Gender equality and human rights approaches to female genital mutilation: a review of international human rights norms and standards. Reproductive Health 14:59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein E, Helzner E, Shayowitz M, Kohlhoff S, Smith-Norowitz TA. 2018. Female genital mutilation: health consequences and complications-A short literature review. Obstetrics and Gynecology İnternational 2018:7365715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Yang Y, Liu ZH, Zhao YJ, Zhang Q, Zhang L, et al. 2020. Progression of Mental Health Services during the COVID-19 Outbreak in China. International Journal of Biological Sciences 16:1732–1738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Han J, Xiao D, Ma C, Chen B. 2010. A report on the reproductive health of women after the massive 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 108:161–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nzinga AM, De Andrade Castanheira S, Hermann J, Feipel V, Kipula AJ, Bertuit J. 2021. Consequences of female genital mutilation on women’s sexual health - systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Sexual Medicine 18:750–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odukogbe AA, Afolabi BB, Bello OO, Adeyanju AS. 2017. Female genital mutilation/cutting in Africa. Translational Andrology and Urology 6:138–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisel D, Creighton SM. 2015. Long term health consequences of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM). Maturitas 80:48–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, et al. 2000. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy 26:191–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouzi AA, Berg RC, Sahly N, Alkafy S, Alzaban F, Abduljabbar H. 2017. Effects of female genital mutilation/cutting on the sexual function of Sudanese women: a cross-sectional study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 217:62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Lancet Public Health. 2021. COVID-19 hindering progress against female genital mutilation. The Lancet 6:e136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund. 2021. Female genital mutilation. UNICEF. [accessed 2021 October 11]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/protection/female-genital-mutilation
   Google Scholar
• United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund. 2022. On international day of zero tolerance for female genital mutilation, UNICEF warns COVID-19 threatens to reverse decades of progress. UNICEF. [accessed 2022 April 28]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/international-day-zero-tolerance-female-genital-mutilation-unicef-warns-covid-19
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2016. Guidelines on the management of health complications from female genital mutilation. Geneva: WHO. [accessed 2021 October 11]. Available from: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/fgm/management-health-complications-fgm/en
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2020. WHO director-general’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19-11. Geneva: WHO. [accessed 2021 October 17]. Available from: https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-%20director-%20general-%20s-%20openingremarks-at-%20the-%20media-%20briefing-%20on-%20covid-19–-11-march-2020
   Google Scholar
• Yuksel B, Ozgor F. 2020. Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on female sexual behavior. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 150:98–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar